This note reports two studies with college students that suggest time of participation (early versus later semester) is an important variable in intrinsic motivation research. In these studies, external constraints undermined interest levels of those subjects participating early but not of those later. This finding is discussed in light of current theorizing, and implications for future research are presented.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adair, J. G. (1973). The human subjects: The social psychology of the psychological experiment. Boston: Little, Brown.
2.
Condry, J. C. (1977). Enemies of exploration: Self-initiated versus other-initiated learning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 459-477.
3.
Cope, C. S. , & Kunice, J. T. (1971). Unobtrusive behavior and research methodology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 18, 592-594.
4.
Deci, E. L. , & Ryan, R. M. (1980). The empirical exploration of intrinsic motivational processes. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 13). New York: Academic Press.
5.
Deci, E. L. , & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.
6.
Evans, R. , & Donnerstein, E. (1974). Some implications for psychological research of early versus late term participation by college subjects. Journal of Research in Personality, 8, 102-109.
7.
Greenberg, E. A. (1978). Extrinsic reward and intrinsic motivation. Paper presented at Western Psychological Association, San Francisco.
8.
Hom, H. L., Jr. (1985). Intrinsic interest: Self goal effects upon high/low need achievers. Paper presented at the meeting of the Western Psychological Association, San Jose, CA.
9.
Jung, J. (1971). The experimental dilemma. New York: Harper & Row.
10.
Kassin, S. M. , & Lepper, M. R. (1984). Over justification and insufficient justification effects: Cognitive and behavioral development. In J. Nicholls (Ed.), The development of achievement motivation. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
11.
Lepper, M. R. , & Gilovich, T. (1981). The multiple functions of reward: A social-developmental perspective. In S. S. Brehm, S. M. Kassin, & F. X. Gibbons (Eds.), Developmental social psychology: Theory and research. New York: Oxford University Press.
12.
Olson, B. C. , Reeve, J., & Cole, S. G. (1985) The effect of competition and achievement motivation on intrinsic motivation. Paper presented at the meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association.
13.
Plant, R. , & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Self-consciousness, self-awareness, ego-involvement, and intrinsic motivation: An investigation of controlling styles. Journal of Personality, 3, 161-165.
14.
Rosenfield, D. , Folger, R., & Adelman, H. (1980). When rewards reflect competence: A qualification of the over justification effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 368-376.
15.
Rosenthal, R. , & Rosnow, R. L. (Eds.). (1969). Artifact in behavioral research. New York: Academic Press.
16.
Ross, M. (1976). The self-perception of intrinsic motivation. In J. H. Harvey, W. J. Ickes, & R. F. Kidd (Eds.), New directions in attribution research (Vol. 1). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17.
Ryan, R. M. (1982). Control and information in the intrapersonal sphere: An extension of cognitive evaluation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 450-461.
18.
Ryan, R. M. , Mims, V., & Koestner, R. (1983). Relation of reward contingency and interpersonal context to intrinsic motivation: A reward and test using cognitive evaluation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 736-750.
19.
Sansone, C. (1986). A question of competence: The effects of competence and task feedback on intrinsic interest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 918-933.
20.
Williams, L. , Mash, E., & Fouts, G. (1977). "Undermining "of intrinsic interest: Real or artifact? Paper presented at the meeting of the Western Psychological Association, Seattle.
