Processing effort for schema-consistent, inconsistent, and neutral information was assessed by a secondary task technique. Schema-consistent and inconsistent information received similar processing effort, and both of these received greater effort than schema-irrelevant (neutral) information. These results suggest that the amount of cognitive effort in processing a sentence is dependent on the relevance of the sentence to a particular schema, and not on whether or not it fits the schema.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anderson, N. H. (1968). Likableness ratings of 555 personality-trait words. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 272-279.
2.
Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering. London: Cambridge University Press.
3.
Brewer, M. B. , Dull, V., & Lui, L. (1981). Perceptions of the elderly: Stereotypes as prototypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 656-670.
4.
Britton, B. K. (1980). Use of cognitive capacity in reading: Effects of processing information from text for immediate recall and retention. Journal of Reading Behavior, 12, 129-137.
5.
Britton, B. K. , Graesser, A. C., Glynn, S. M., Hamilton, T., & Penland, M. (1983). Use of cognitive capacity in reading: Effects of some content features of text. Discourse Processes, 6, 39-57.
6.
Britton, B. K. , Holdredge, T. S., Curry, C., & Westbrook, R. D. (1979). Use of cognitive capacity in reading identical texts with different amounts of discourse level meaning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 262-270.
7.
Britton, B. K. , & Tesser, A. (1982). Effects of prior knowledge en use of cognitive capacity in three complex cognitive tasks. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 421-436.
8.
Britton, B. K. , Westbrook, R. D., & Holdredge, T. S. (1978). Reading and cognitive capacity usage: Effects of text difficulty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 582-591.
9.
Britton, B. K. , Ziegler, R., & Westbrook, R. (1980). Use of cognitive capacity in reading easy and difficult text: Two tests of an allocation of attention hypothesis. Journal of Reading Behavior, 12, 23-30.
10.
Craik, F. I. M. , & Tulving, E. (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 268-294.
11.
Crocker, J. , Hanah, D., & Weber, R. (1983). Person memory and causal attributions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 55-66.
12.
Eysenck, M. W. , & Eysenck, M. C. (1979). Processing depth, elaboration of encoding, memory stores, and expended processing capacity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 472-484.
13.
Graesser, A. C. (1981). Prose comprehension beyond the word. New York: Springer-Verlag.
14.
Graesser, A. C. , Gordon, S. E., & Sawyer, J. D. (1979). Recognition memory for typical and atypical actions in scripted activities: Tests of a script pointer + tag hypothesis. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 319-332.
15.
Graesser, A. C. , Woll, S. B., Kowalski, D. J., & Smith, D. A. (1980). Memory for typical and atypical actions in scripted activities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 503-515.
16.
Hamilton, D. L. , Katz, L. B., & Leirer, V. O. (1980). Organizational processes in impression formation. In R. Hastie, T. M. Ostrom, E. B. Ebbesen, R. S. Wyer, D. L. Hamilton, & D. E. Carlston (Eds.), Person memory: The cognitive basis of social perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
17.
Hastie, R. (1980). Memory for behavioral information that confirms or contradicts a personality impression. In R. Hastie, T. M. Ostrom, E. B. Ebbesen, R. S. Wyer, D. L. Hamilton, & D. E. Carlston (Eds.), Person memory: The cognitive basis of social perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
18.
Hastie, R. , & Kumar, P. A. (1979). Person Memory: Personality traits as organizing principles in memory for behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 25-38.
19.
Hemsley, G. D. , & Marmurek, H. H. C. (1982). Person memory: The processing of consistent and inconsistent person information. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8, 433-438.
20.
Jacoby, L. L. , Craik, F. I. M., & Begg, I. (1979). Effects of decision difficulty on recognition and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 585-600.
21.
Kerr, B. (1973). Processing demands during mental operations. Memory and Cognition, 1, 401-412.
22.
Posner, M. I. , & Boies, S. W. (1971). Components of attention. Psychological Review, 78, 391-408.
23.
Rothbart, M. , Evans, M., & Fulero, S. (1979). Recall for confirming events: Memory processes and the maintenance of social stereotypes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 15, 343-355.
24.
Schank, R. C. , & Abelson, R. P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals and understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
25.
Spiro, R. J. (1980). Accommodative reconstruction in prose recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 84-95.
26.
Tyler, S. W. , Hertel, P. T., McCallum, M. C., & Ellis, H. C. (1979). Cognitive effort and memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 607-617.
27.
Wyer, R. S. , & Srull, T. K. (1980). The processing of social stimulus information: A conceptual integration. In R. Hastie, T. M. Ostrom, E. B. Ebbesen, R. S. Wyer, D. L. Hamilton, & D. E. Carlston (Eds.), Person memory: The cognitive basis of social perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
