Evidence from historical analyses, legal history, and attribution studies is reviewed as it concerns how evidence of drunkenness affects the attribution of responsibility. The findings are discussed from the viewpoint of attribution theory. Several theoretical issues are discussed, including definitions of responsibility and individual differences. The available information supports the cultural ambivalence toward the use of alcohol.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Annotation, Voluntary intoxication as defense to homicide. 12 A.L.R. (1920)
2.
Annotation, Modem status of the rule as to voluntary intoxication as defense to criminal charge. 8 A.L.R. 3d (1966)
3.
Aristotle , Nicomachean ethics.
4.
Baldus, D. C.Quantitative methods for judging the comparative excessiveness of death sentences. In M. J. Saks & C. H. Baron (Eds.), The use/nonuse/misuse of applied social research in the courts. Cambridge, MA: Abt Books, 1980.
5.
Beck, S. M. , & Parker, G. E.The intoxicated offender-a problem of responsibility. Canadian Bar Review, 1966, 44, 563-609.
6.
Berner, S. H.The defense of drunkenness-a reconsideration . University of British Columbia Law Review, 1971, 6, 309-351.
7.
Brett, P.An inquiry into criminal guilt. Sydney: Law Book Company of Australia, 1963.
8.
Brown, S. A. , Goldman, M. S., Inn, A., & Anderson, L. R.Expectations of reinforcement from alcohol: Their domain and relation to drinking patterns. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1980, 48, 419-426.
9.
California Penal Code (West. Ann. 1958), Sec. 22.
10.
Carroll, J. S. , & Wiener, R. L.Cognitive social psychology in court and beyond. In A. H. Hastorf and A. M. Isen (Eds.), Cognitive social psychology. New York: Elsevier North-Holland, 1982.
11.
Comment, Instructing the jury on the defense of voluntary intoxication in Tennessee . Tennessee Law Review, 1972, 39, 479-501(a).
12.
Comment, The mentally impaired and voluntarily intoxicated criminal offender . Washington University Law Quarterly, 1972, 15, 161-169(b).
13.
D.P.P. v. Beard, A. C. 479 (1920)
14.
Dobash, R. E. , & Dobash, R.Violence against wives: A case against the patriarchy. New York: Free Press, 1979.
15.
Epstein, T.A sociolegal examination of intoxication and the criminal law . Contemporary Drug Problems, 1978, 7, 401-471.
16.
Ferguson, G. A.Mens rea evaluated in terms of the essential elements of a crime, specific intent, and drunkenness . Ottawa Law Review, 1971, 4, 356-388.
17.
Fincham, F. D. , & Jaspars, J. M.Attribution of responsibility: From man the scientist to man as lawyer. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 13). New York: Academic Press, 1980.
18.
Fingarette, H. , & Hasse, A. F.Mental disabilities and criminal responsibility. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1979.
19.
Gelles, R.The Violent Home. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1972.
20.
Gelles, R. J. , & Straus, M. A.Determinants of violence in the family: Toward a theoretical integration. In W. R. Burr, R. Hill, F. L. Nye, & I. L. Reis (Eds.) Contemporary theories about the family. New York: Free Press, 1979.
21.
Hall, J.General principles of criminal law. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1960.
22.
Hamilton, C. J. , & Collins, J. J.The role of alcohol in wife beating and child abuse: A review of the literature. In J. J. Collins (Ed.), Drinking and crime. New York: Guilford Press, 1981.
23.
Harrel, W. A.The effects of alcohol use and offender remorsefulness on sentencing decisions . Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1981, 11, 83-91.
24.
Harvey, M. D. , & Rule, B. G.Moral evaluations and judgments of responsibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1978, 4, 583-588.
25.
Heider, F.The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: John Wiley, 1958.
26.
Horton, D.Alcohol in primitive societies . Quarterly Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 1943, 4, 199-320.
27.
Jones, E. E. & Davis, K. E.From acts to dispositions. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2). New York: Academic Press, 1965.
28.
Jones, E. E. , & McGillis, D.Correspondent inferences and the attribution cube: A còmparative reappraisal. In J. Harvey, W. Ickes, and R. Kidd (Eds.), New directions in attribution research. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1976.
29.
Kalven, H. , & Zeisel, H.The American jury. Boston: Little, Brown, 1966.
30.
Kelley, H. H.Attribution in social interaction. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press, 1971.
31.
Kelley, H. H.Causal schemata and the attribution process. In E. E. Joneset al. (Eds.) Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press, 1972.
32.
Lang, A. R. , Searles, J., Lauerman, R., & Adesso, V.Expectancy, alcohol, and sex guilt as determinants of interest in and reaction to sexual stimuli. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1980, 89, 644-653.
33.
Levine, H. G.The discovery of addiction: changing conceptions of habitual drunkenness in America . Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 1978, 39, 143-174.
34.
MacAndrew, C. , & Edgerton, R. B.Drunken comportment: A social explanation. Chicago: Aldine, 1969.
35.
Mayfield, D.Alcoholism, alcohol intoxication, and assaultive behavior . Diseases of the Nervous System, 1976, 37, 288-291.
36.
McCaghy, C. H.Drinking and deviance disavowal: The case of child molesters . Social Problems, 1968, 16, 43-49.
37.
McNaghten's Case, 8 Eng. Reprint 718 (1843)
38.
Medicolegal Notes, Intoxication in mitigation of homicide . Quarterly Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 1941, 2, 396-405.
39.
Mittermaier, C. J. A.On the effect of drunkenness upon criminal responsibility and the application of punishment . American Jurist, 1840, 23, 290-332.
40.
Murphy, A. A.The intoxication defense: An introduction to Mr. Smith's article . Dickinson Law Review, 1971, 776, 1-14.
41.
Myerson, A.Alcohol: A study of social ambivalence . Quarterly Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 1940,1, 13-20.
42.
Note, Intoxication as a criminal offense . Columbia Law Review, 1955, 55, 1210-1221.
43.
Note, Volitional fault and the intoxicated criminal offender . University of Cincinnati Law Review, 1967, 36, 258-305.
44.
Note, A study of the California penalty jury in first-degree murder cases . Stanford Law Review, 1969, 21, 1297.
45.
Note, Alcohol abuse and the law . Harvard Law Review, 1981, 94, 1660-1712.
46.
Pallak, S. R. , & Davies, J. M.Finding fault versus attributing responsibility: Using facts differently. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1982, 8, 454-459.
47.
Pernanen, K.Alcohol and crimes of violence. In B. Kissin & H. Begleiter (Eds.), The biology of alcoholism (Vol. 4) New York: Plenum, 1976.
48.
People v. Hood, 1 Cal. 3d 444, 2d 370 (1969)
49.
Phares, E. J. , & Wilson, K. G.Responsibility attribution: Role of outcome severity, situational ambiguity, and internal-external control. Journal of Personality, 1972,40, 392-406.
50.
Pittman, D. J.Alcoholism. New York: Harper & Row, 1967.
51.
R. v. Doherty, 16 Cox C. C. 306 (1887)
52.
R. v. Meakin, 7 C. & P. 297 (1836)
53.
R. v. Monkhouse, 4 Cox C.C. 44 (1849)
54.
Rada, R. T.Alcoholism and forcible rape . American Journal of Psychiatry, 1975, 132, 444.
55.
Recent Criminal Cases, Intoxication in "mitigation" of murder . Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 1940, 31, 72-74.
56.
Reed, D. S.Reducing the costs of drinking and driving. In M. H. Moore & D. R. Gerstein (Eds.), Alcohol and public policy. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1981.
57.
Reniger v. Feogossa, I Plowden 19 (1551)
58.
Richardson, D. C. , & Campbell, J. L.Alcohol and wife abuse: The effect of alcohol on attributions of blame for wife abuse. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 1980, 6, 51-56.
59.
Richardson, D. C. , & Campbell, S. L.Alcohol and rape: The effect of alcohol on attributions of blame for rape. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1982, 8, 468-476.
60.
Roberts v. People, 19 Mich. 408 (1870)
61.
Roizen, R.Loosening up: General population views of the effects of alcohol . Presented at the Conference on Alcohol and Disinhibition, Berkeley, California, January 1981.
62.
Room, R.Ambivalence as a sociological explanation: The case of cultural explanations of alcohol problems . American Sociological Review, 1976, 41, 1047-1065.
63.
Roth, W.General vs. specific intent: A time for terminological understanding in California . Pepperdine Law Review, 1979, 7, 67-84.
64.
Shaw, M. E. , & Reitan, H. T.Attribution of responsibility as a basis for sanctioning behavior. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 1969, 8, 217-226.
65.
Singh, R. U.History of the defence of drunkenness in English criminal Law . Law Quarterly Review, 1933, 49, 529-546.
66.
Slough, M. C.Some legal by-products of intoxication . Kansas Law Review, 1955, 3, 181-220.
67.
Sobell, L. C. , & Sobell, M. B.Drunkenness, a "special circumstance" in crimes of violence: Sometimes. International Journal of the Addictions, 1975, 10, 869-882.
68.
Sobell, M. B. , & Sobell, L. C.Individualized behavior therapy for alcoholics. Behavior Therapy, 1973, 4, 49-72.
69.
Sosis, R. H.Internal-external control and the perception of responsibility of another for an accident . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1974, 3, 393-399.
70.
Southwick, L. , Steele, C. M., Marlatt, G. A., & Lindell, M.Alcohol-related expectancies: Defined by phase of intoxication and drinking experience. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1981, 49, 713-721.
71.
Straus, R. & Bacon, S.Drinking in college. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1953.
72.
Suls, J.Estimating behavior-belief congruence in intoxicated persons . Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 1978, 39, 1299-1301.
73.
Taylor, S. , & Gammon, C.The effects of type and dose of alcohol on human aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975, 32, 169-175.
74.
Washburne, C.Primitive drinking. New York: College and University Press, 1961.
