Health settings provide an important arena within which to test and refine social psychological theories. Using interview data from cancer patients, results are presented pertaining to four areas of social psychological theory: attribution theory, psychological control, social comparison theory, and victimization.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abrams, R. D. , & Finesinger, J. E.Guilt reactions in patients with cancer. Cancer, 1953,6, 474-482.
2.
Brickman, P. , Rabinowitz, U. C., Coates, D., Cohn, E., Kidder, L., & Karuza, J.Helping. American Psychologist, in press.
3.
Bulman, R. J. , & Wortman, C. B.Attributions of blame and coping in the "real world": Severe accident victims react to their lot. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1977, 35, 351-363.
4.
Croog, S. H. , & Levine, S.7he heart patient recovers. New York: Human Sciences, 1977.
5.
Davis, M. S.Variations in patients' compliance with doctors' orders: Analysis of congruence between survey responses and results of empirical investigations . Journal of Medical Education, 1966, 41, 1037-1048.
6.
Davis, M. S.Variations in patients' compliance with doctors' advice: An empirical analysis of patterns of communication . American Journal of Public Health, 1968, 58, 274-288.
7.
Festinger, L.A theory of social comparison process . Human Relations, 1954, 7, 117-140.
8.
Hakmiller, K. L.Threat as a determinant of downward comparison . Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Supplement, 1966, 1, 32-39.
9.
Heider, F.The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: John Wiley, 1958.
10.
Janoff-Bulman, R.Characterological versus behavioral self-blame: Inquiries into depression and rape . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1979, 37, 1798-1809.
11.
Jones, E. E. , & Davis, K. E.From acts to dispositions: The attribution process in person perception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2.) New York: Academic Press, 1965.
12.
Kelley, H. H.Attribution theory in social psychology. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation 1967. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1967.
13.
Kelley, H. H.The causes of behavior: Their perception and regulation. In L. Festinger (Ed.), Retrospectives on social psychology. New York: Oxford University Press, 1980.
14.
Meyerowitz, B. E.Postmastectomy psychosocial condition of women in two breast cancer treatment modalities . Dissertation Abstracts International, 1978, 39, 2510.
15.
Meyerowitz, B. E. Personal communication. Los Angeles, March 1980. (Meyerowitz is now in the Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.)
16.
Thompson, S. C.A complex answer to a simple question: Will it hurt less if I can control it?Psychological Bulletin, 1981, 90, 89-101.
17.
Weisman, A. D.Coping with an untimely death. In R. J. Moss (Ed.), Human adaptation. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath, 1976.
18.
Wheeler, L. , Shaver, K. G., Jones, R. A., Goethals, G. R., Cooper, J., Robinson, J. E., Gruder, C. L., & Outzine, K. W.Factors determining the choice of a comparison other. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1969, 5, 219-232.
19.
Wortman, C. B. , & Dintzer, L.Is an attributional analysis of the learned helplessness phenomenon viable?: A critique of the Abramson-Seligman-Teasdale reformulation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1978, 87, 75-90.
20.
Wortman, C. B. , & Dunkel-Schetter, C. D.Interpersonal relationships and cancer: A theoretocial analysis. Journal of Social Issues, 1979, 35, 120-155.
21.
Wortman, C. B. , & Silver, R.Coping with uncontrollable events. Paper presented at the American Psychological Association Annual Meeting, Los Angeles, August 1981.
