Several theoretical problems in social psychology have been resilient to correction or resolution as illustrated in the case of sex-role research. This article proposes that these problems require modifications in our metatheoretical bases. Although alternative metatheories have been postulated by numerous social psychologists, the development of methodology and of viable research programs remains. It is suggested that historiography may inform the social psychologist on these matters.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Angrist, S.The study of sex roles. In-J. M. Bardwick (Ed.), Readings on the psychology of women. New York: Harper & Row, 1972.
2.
Armistead, N. (Ed.). Reconstructing social psychology. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin, 1974.
3.
Bem, S. L.Psychology looks at sex roles: Where have all the androgynous people gone? Paper presented at the UCLA Symposium on Women, May 1972.
4.
Bem, S. L.The measurement of psychological androgyny . Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1974, 42(2), 155-162.
5.
Bem, S. L.On the utility of alternative procedures for assessing psychological androgyny . Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1977, 45, 196-205.
6.
Bernard, J.Change and stability in sex-role norms and behavior . Journal of Social Issues, 1976, 32, 207-224.
7.
Block, J. H.Conceptions of sex role: Some cross-cultural and longitudinal perspectives . American Psychologist, 1973, 28, 512-526.
8.
Carlson, R.Understanding women: Implications for personality theory and research . Journal of Social Issues, 1972, 28, 17-32.
9.
Carr, E. H.What is history?New York: Macmillan, 1961.
10.
Carroll, B. A. (Ed.) Liberating Women's History: Theoretical and Critical Essays. Urbana, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1976.
11.
Emmerich, W.Socialization and sex-role development. In P. B. Baltes and K. W. Schaie (Eds.), Life-span developmental psychology: Personality and socialization. New York: Academic Press, 1973.
12.
Favreau, O. E.Sex bias in psychological research . Canadian Psychological Review, 1977, 18, 56-65.
13.
Fee, E.The sexual politics of Victorian social anthropology. In M. Hartman and L. W. Banner (Eds.), Clio's Consciousness Raised: New Perspectives on the History of Women. New York: Harper & Row, 1974.
14.
Finison, L. J.Should the history of social psychology be rated "X'? Paper presented at the Eastern Psychological Association, New York, April 22, 1981.
15.
Gadamer, H. G.The problem of historical consciousness. In P. Rabinow and W. M. Sullivan (Eds.), Interpretive social science: A reader. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1979.
16.
Gadlin, H. , & Ingle, G.Through a one-way mirror: The limits of experimental self-reflection. American Psychologist, 1975, 30, 1003-1010.
17.
Gergen, K. J. , & Morawski, J. G.An alternative metatheory for social psychology. Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 1980, 1, 326-352.
18.
Harré, R. , & Secord, P. F.The explanation of social behavior. Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell, 1972.
19.
Harris, B.An undergraduate seminar in the history of social psychology . Paper presented at the Eastern Psychological Association, New York, April 22, 1981.
20.
Helson, R.The changing image of the career woman . Journal of Social Issues, 1972, 28, 33-46.
21.
Hoffman, L. W.Changes in family roles, socialization, and sex differences . American Psychologist, 1977, 32, 644-657.
22.
Hughes, H. S.History, as art and science. New York: Harper & Row, 1974.
23.
James, W.The principles of psychology. Boston: Henry Holt, 1890.
24.
Kelly-Gadol, J.The social relation of the sexes: Methodological implications of women's history . Signs, 1975, 1, 809-824.
25.
Lipman-Blumen, J.Changing sex roles in American culture: Future directions for research . Archives of Sexual Behavior, 1975, 4, 433-446.
Oakeshott, M.Historical continuity and causal analysis. In W. H. Dray (Ed.), Philosophical analysis and history. New York: Harper & Row, 1966.
28.
Passmore, J.Explanation in everyday life, in science, and in history . History and Theory, 1962, 2, 105-123.
29.
Passmore, J.The objectivity of history. In W. H. Dray (Ed.), Philosophical analysis of history. New York: Harper & Row, 1966.
30.
Pepper, S.World Hypotheses. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1942.
31.
Praz, M.The romantic agony. New York: Oxford University Press, 1951.
32.
Rabinow, P. , & Sullivan, W. M. (Eds.), Interpretive social science: A reader. Berkeley: University of California, 1979.
33.
Rosenberg, M.The biologic basis for sex role stereotypes . Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 1973, 9, 374-391.
34.
Rosnow, R. L.Paradigms in transition: The methodology of social inquiry. New York: Oxford University Press, 1981.
35.
Sampson, E. E.Psychology and the American ideal . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1977, 35, 767-782.
36.
Sampson, E. E.Scientific paradigms and social values: Wanted-a scientific revolution . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1978, 36, 1332-1343.
37.
Scriven, M.Causes, connections and conditions in history. In W. H. Dray (Ed.), Philosophical analysis of history. New York: Harper & Row, 1966.
38.
Scriven, M.Causation as explanation . Nous, 1975, 9, 3-16.
39.
Smith-Rosenberg, C.Puberty to menopause: the cycle of femininity in nineteenth-century America. In M. Hartman and L. W. Banner (Eds.), Clio's consciousness raised. New perspectives on the history of women. New York: Harper & Row, 1974.
40.
Smith-Rosenberg, C.The female world of love and ritual: Relations between women in nineteenth-century America . Signs, 1975, 1, 1-30.
41.
Spence, J. T. , Helmreich, R., & Stapp, J.Ratings of self and peers on sex role attributes and their relation to self-esteem and conceptions of masculinity and femininity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975, 32, 29-39.
42.
Walsh, W. H.The limits of scientific history. In W. H. Dray (Ed.), Philosophical analysis of history. New York: Harper & Row, 1966.
43.
Weingartner, R. H.The quarrel about historical explanation. In M. Brodbeck (Ed.), Readings in the philosophy of the social sciences. New York: Macmillan, 1968.
44.
White, H.Interpretation in history . New Literary History, 1973, 4, 281-314.
45.
Wood, A. D."The fashionable diseases": Women's complaints and their treatment in nineteenth century America. In M. Hartman and L. W. Banner (Eds.), Clio's consciousness raised: New perspectives on the history of women. New York: Harper & Row, 1974.
