Two studies showed that bias of jurors in favor of an attractive defendant was significantly reduced by increasing the factual material in the case. Our findings suggest that increasing the quantity and precision of relevant facts transfers the emphasis from judging the perpetrator to judging the crime.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Allport, G. , & Postman, L.The psychology of rumor. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1947.
2.
Doob, A.Evidence, procedure, and psychological research. In G. Bermant, C. Nemeth, & N. Vidmar (Eds.), Psychology and the law. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath, 1976.
3.
Kaplan, M. , & Miller, L.Reducing the effects of juror bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1978, 36, 1443-1455.
4.
Kelley, H.Attribution theory in social psychology . In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1967.
5.
Landy, D. , & Aronson, E.The influence of the character of the criminal and his victim on the decisions of simulated jurors. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1969, 5, 141-152.
6.
Sue, S. , Smith, R., & Caldwell, C.Effects of inadmissible evidence on the decisions of simulated jurors: A moral dilemma. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1973, 3, 345-353.
