The purpose of this study, was to determine whether differences in conceptual complexity are related to the tendency of preservice teachers to make ego-defensive attributions for student performance under success or failure conditions. It was hypothesized that concrete individuals would make more ego-defensive attributions than abstract individuals and abstract individuals would make more nondefensive attributions than concrete individuals. The data support the hypotheses only for attributions regarding student ability and motivation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Beckman, L.Effects of students' performance on teachers' and observers' attributions of causality . Journal of Educational Psychology, 1973, 65, 198-204.
2.
Bradley, G. W.Self-serving biases in the attribution process: A reexamination of the fact or fiction question . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1978, 36, 56-71.
3.
Davis, W. L. , & Davis, D. E.Internal-external control and attribution of responsibility for success and failure. Journal of Personality, 1972, 40, 130-136.
4.
Harvey, O. J.Some cognitive determinants of influenceability . Sociometry, 1964, 27, 208-221.
5.
Harvey, O. J.System, structure, flexibility, and creativity. In O. J. Harvey (Ed.), Experience, structure, and adaptability. New York: John Wiley, 1966.
6.
Harvey, O. J. , Hunt, D. E., & Schroder, H. M.Conceptual systems and personality organization. New York: John Wiley, 1961.
7.
Harvey, O. J. , & Ware, R.Personality differences in dissonance resolution. Journal of Personality, and Social Psychology. 1967, 7, 227-230.
8.
Johnson, R. , Feigenbaum, R., & Weiby, M.Some determinants and consequences of the teacher's perception of causation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1964, 55, 237-246.
9.
Miller, D. T. , & Ross, M.Self-serving biases in the attribution of causality. Fact or fiction?Psychological Bulletin, 1975, 82, 213-225.
10.
Ross, L. , Bierbrauer, D., & Polly, S.Attribution of educational outcomes by professional and nonprofessional instructors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1974, 29, 609-618.
11.
Streufert, S. , & Streufert, S. C.Effects of conceptual structure, failure and success on attribution of causality and interpersonal attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1969, 11, 138-147.
12.
Ware, R. , & Harvey, O. J.A cognitive determinant of impression formation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1967, 5, 38-44.
13.
Weiner, B. , & Kukla, A.An attributional analysis of achievement motivation. Journal of Personality, and Social Psychology1970, 15, 1-20.
14.
White, S. J. , & Harvey, O. J.Effects of personality and own stand on judgment and production of statements about a central issue. Journal of Experimental and Social Psychology, 1965, 1, 334-347.
15.
Zuckerman, M.Attribution of success and failure revisited, or: The motivational bias is alive and well in attribution theory . Journal of Personality, 1979, 47, 245-287.
