People judged as highly attractive are more typical in appearance than people who are judged as less attractive. They are liked better but are harder to recognize because they are more similar to each other. This constellation of results is consistent with current views about the nature of category structure.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anisfeld, M. , & Knapp, M.Association, synonymity, and directionality in false recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1968, 77, 171-179.
2.
Berscheid, E. , & Walster, E.Physical attractiveness. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology. Vol. 7. New York: Academic, 1974.
3.
Bower, G. H. , & Karlin, M. B.Depth of processing of faces and recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1974, 103, 751-757.
4.
Cohen, M. E. , & Carr, W. J.Facial recognition and the von Restorff effect. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1975, 6, 383-384.
5.
Cross, J. F. , Cross, J., & Daly, J.Sex, race, age, and beauty as factors in recognition of faces. Perception & Psychophysics, 1971, 10, 393-396.
6.
Galton, F.Inquiries into human faculty and its development (2nd ed.). New York: Elsevier North Holland, 1907.
7.
Going, M. , & Read, J. D.Effects of uniqueness, sex of subject, and sex of photograph on facial recognition. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1974, 39, 109-110.
8.
Harrison, A. A.Mere exposure. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology. Vol. 10. New York: Academic, 1977.
9.
Helson, H.Adaptation-level theory: An experimental and systematic approach to behavior. New York: Harper & Row, 1964.
10.
Light, L. L. , Kayra-Stuart, F., & Hollander, S.Recognition memory for typical and unusual faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1979, 5, 212-229.
11.
Pezdek, K.Recognition memory for related pictures . Memory & Cognition, 1978, 6, 64-69.
12.
Rosch, E. , & Mervis, C. B.Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 1975, 7, 573-605.
13.
Shepherd, J. W. , & Ellis, H. D.The effect of attractiveness on recognition memory for faces. American Journal of Psychology, 1973, 86, 627-633.
14.
Tversky, A.Features of similarity . Psychological Review, 1977, 84, 327-352.
15.
Underwood, B. J. , & Freund, J. S.Errors in recognition learning and retention. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1968, 78, 55-63.
16.
Winograd, E.Recognition memory for faces following nine different judgments . Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1976, 8, 419-421.
17.
Zajonc, R. B.Attitudinal effects of mere exposure . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Monograph, 1968, 9 (2, Part 2).
