In order to determine when ethical ideology influences judgments of morality, individuals who endorsed an absolutist, exceptionist, subjectivist, or situationist ideology morally evaluated an actor linked, at varying levels of responsibility, to positive or negative outcomes. As predicted, absolutists judged the actor more harshly than exceptionists, but only when the described actor has foreseen or intended to produce a highly negative consequence.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Forsyth, D. R.A taxonomy of ethical ideologies . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1980, 39, 175-184.
2.
Harvey, M. D. , & Rule, B. G.Moral evaluations and judgments of responsibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1978, 4, 483-488.
3.
Heider, F.The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: John Wiley, 1958.
4.
Milgram, S.Some conditions of obedience and disobedience to authority . Human Relations, 1965, 18, 57-76.
5.
Schlenker, B. R. , & Forsyth, D. R.On the ethics of psychological research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1977, 13, 369-396.
6.
Sedlak, A. J.Developmental differences in understanding plans and evaluating actors . Child Development, 1979, 50, 536-560.
7.
Shaw, M. E. , & Sulzer, J. L.An empirical test of Heider's levels in the attribution of responsibility. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1964, 69, 39-46.
