Exemplary research in social cognition and perception is examined. It is suggested that a singular focus on internal, intraindividual cognitive and perceptual processes is not sufficiently broad to account adequately for the spectrum of social knowing phenomena. A more molar approach to social knowing than can be found in contemporary work in social cognition and perception is advocated. More specifically, it is suggested that work on molecular cognitive and perceptual processes will help elucidate basic social knowing phenomena only when such processes are meaningfully tied to the social contexts in which they, occur and to ongoing social behavior.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
1. Pryor, J. D. & Ostrom, T. M.Cognitive organization of person information: A multiple operationalization approach. Unpublished manuscript, University of Notre Dame, 1980.
2.
2. Yarkin, K. L., Harvey, J. H., & Bloxom, B. M.Cognitive sets, attribution and overt behavior. Unpublished manuscript, Vanderbilt University, 1980.
3.
Baron, R. M.Social knowing from an ecological event perspective: A consideration of the domains of power for cognitive and perceptual modes of knowing. In J. H. Harvey (Ed.), (Cognition, social behavior and the environment. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, in press.
4.
Bradley, G. & Weary, G.Self-serving biases in the attribution process: A reexamination of the fact or fiction question. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1978, 36, 56-71.
5.
Frey, D.Reactions to success and failure in public and private conditions . Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1978, 14, 172-179.
6.
Harvey, J. H. , & Weary, G.Perspectives on attributional processes. Dubuque, IA: Wm. C. Brown, in press.
7.
Harvey, J. H. , Wells, G. L., & Alverez, M. D.Attribution in the context of conflict and separation in close relationships. In J. H. Harvey, W. Ickes, and R. F. Kidd (Eds.), New directions in attribution research, Vol. 2. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1978.
8.
Hastie, R. , Ostrom, T. M., Ebbesen, E. B., Wyer, R. S., Hamilton, D. L., & Carlston, D. E.Person memor i: Cognitive basis of social perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1980.
Heider, F.The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: John Wiley, 1958.
11.
Jones, E. E.A conversation with Edward E. Jones and Harold H. Kelley. In J. H. Harvey, W. Ickes, and R. F. Kidd (Eds.), New directions in attribution research Vol. 2. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1978.
12.
Jones, E. E. & Davis, K. E.From acts to dispositions: The attribution process in person perception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 2. New York: Academic Press, 1965.
13.
Jones, E. E. & Thibaut, J. W.Interaction goals as bases of inference in person perception. In R. Taguiri and L. Petrullo (Eds.), Person perception and interpersonal behavior. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press, 1955.
14.
Kelley, H. H.Attribution theory in social psychology. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation, Vol. 15. Lincoln: Univ. of Nebraska Press, 1967.
15.
Kelley, H. H. & Michela, J. L.Attribution theory and research. Annual Review of Psychology, 1980, 31, 457-501.
16.
Newtson, D.Attribution and the unit of perception of ongoing behavior . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1973, 28, 28-38.
17.
Newtson, D.Foundations of attribution: The perception of ongoing behavior. In J. H. Harvey, W. Ickes, and R. F. Kidd (Eds.), Newz directions in attribution research, Vol. 1. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1976.
18.
Orvis, B. R. , Cunningham, J. D., & Kelley, H. H.A closer examination of causal inference: The roles of consensus, distinctiveness, and consistency information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1975, 32, 605-616.
19.
Orvis, B. R. , Kelley, H. H., & Butler, D.Attributional conflict in young couples. In J. H. Harvey, W. Ickes, and R. F. Kidd (Eds.), New(directions in attribution research, Vol. 1. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1976.
20.
Pryor, J. D. & Kriss, M.The cognitive dynamics of salience in the attribution process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology1977, 35, 49-55.
21.
Ross, M. & Sicoly, F.Egocentric biases in availability and attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1979, 37. 322-336.
22.
Smith, E. R. & Miller, F. D.Salience and the cognitive mediation of attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1979, 37, 2240-2252.
23.
Snyder, M. & Gangestad, S.Hypothesis-testing processes. In J. H. Harvey, W. Ickes, and R. F. Kidd (Eds.), New directions in attribution research, Vol. 3. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, in press.
24.
Snyder, M. & Swann, W.Behavioral confirmation in social interaction: From social perception to social reality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1978, 14, 148-162.
25.
Snyder, M. , Tanke, E. D., & Berscheid, E.Social perception and interpersonal behavior: On the self-fulfilling nature of social stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1977, 35, 656-666.
26.
Snyder, M. , Stephan, W. G., & Rosenfield, D.Attributional egotism. In J. H. Harvey, W. J. Ickes. and R. F. Kidd (Eds.), New directions in attribution research. Vol. 2. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1978.
27.
Stryker, S. & Gottlieb, A.Attribution theory and symbolic interactionism: A comparison. ln J. H. Harvey, W. Ickes, and R. F. Kidd (Eds.), New directions in attribution research, Vol. 3. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, in press.
28.
Taylor, S. E. , Crocker, J., Fiske, S. T., Sprinzen, M., & Winkler, J. D.The generalizability of salience effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1979. 37, 357-368.
29.
Weary,. G.Affect and egotism as mediators of bias in causal attributions . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1980, 38. 348-357.
30.
Weary, G. , Rich, M. C., Harvey, J. H.. & Ickes, W. J.Heider's formulation of social perception and attributional processes: Toward further clarification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 1980, 6. 37-43.
31.
Wyer, R. S. & Carlston, D. E.Social cognition, inference and attribution. Hillsdale. NJ: Erlbaum, 1979.
