Recent enthusiasm for the social schema concept has been accompanied by a wave of criticism. Skeptics argue that the concept is imprecise and nonfalsifiable, irrelevant to real social phenomena, and simply old wine in a new bottle. While finding elements of truth in each criticism, this article concludes that the strengths of the schema framework more than outweigh the liabilities associated with these criticisms.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
1. Markus, H., Sentis, K., & Hamill, R.On thinking you are fat: Consequences for information processing. Paper presented at the American Psychological Association Meeting, Toronto, August, 1978.
2.
2. Wyer, R. S.The nature and use of schemata about persons. Invited address at Midwestern Psychological Association, 1979.
3.
3. Michela, J. L. & Collins, B. E.Attribution processes in prediction and enactment of behavior. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Los Angeles, 1979.
4.
4. Fiske, S. T., Milberg, S. J., Destefano, T. T., & Maffett, S.Political person perception. Unpublished manuscript, Carnegie-Mellon University, 1980.
5.
5. Linville, P. W.Schema complexity and evaluative extremity in age-based stereotyping. Unpublished manuscript, Carnegie-Mellon University, 1980.
6.
6. Fiske, S. T., Kinder, D. R., & Larter, W. M.The novice and the expert: Schematic strategies in political cognition. Unpublished manuscript, Carnegie-Mellon University, 1980.
7.
Abelson, R. P.The psychological status of the script concept. American Psychologist, in press.
8.
Anderson, J. R.Language, memory, and thought. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1976.
9.
Anderson, J. R.Concepts, propositions, and schemata: What are the cognitive units?Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Lincoln, NE: Univ. of Nebraska Press, 1980.
10.
Anderson, J. R.Cognitive psychology and its implications. San Francisco: Freeman, 1980.
11.
Anderson, R. C. & Pichert, J. W.Recall of previously unrecallable information following a shift in perspective. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1978, 17, 1-12.
12.
Bartlett, F.Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1932.
13.
Bobrow, D. G. & Norman, D. A.Some principles of memory schemata. In D. G. Bobrow & A. Collins (Eds.), Representation and understanding: Studies in cognitive science. New York: Academic Press, 1975.
14.
Bower, G. H. , Black, J. B., & Turner, T. J.Scripts in memory for text. Cognitive Psychology, 1979, 11, 177-220.
15.
Bransford, J. D.Human cognition: Learning, understanding, and remembering. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 1979.
16.
Calder, B. J. & Ross, M.Attitudes and behavior. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press, 1973.
17.
Cantor, N. & Mischel, W.Prototypes in person perception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 12. New York: Academic Press, 1979.
18.
Carroll, J. S. & Payne, J. W. (Eds.), Cognition and social behavior. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1976.
19.
Clark, M. S & Isen, A. M.Toward understanding the relationship between feeling states and social behavior. ln A. Hastorf & A. Isen (Eds.), Cognitive Social Psychology Vol. 1. Theories and Issues in Psychology. New York: Elsevier North-Holland, in press.
20.
Deutsch, M. & Krauss, R. M.Theories in social psychology. New York: Basic Books, 1965.
21.
Fiske, S. T.Social cognition and affect. In J. Harvey (Ed.), Cognition, social behavior, and the environment. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1980.
22.
Fiske, S. T. & Kinder, D. R.Involvement, expertise, and schema use: Evidence from political cognition. In N. Cantor & J. Kihlstrom (Eds.), Personality, cognition, and social interaction. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1980.
23.
Gergen, K. J.The psychology of behavior exchange. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1969.
24.
Hamilton, D. L. , Katz, L. B., & Leirer, V. O.Organizational processes in impression formation. In R. Hastie, T. Ostrom, E. Ebbesen, R. Wyer, D. Hamilton, & D. Carlston (Eds.), Person memory: The cognitive basis of socialperception. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1980.
25.
Hastie, R.Schematic principles in human memory. In E. T. Higgins, C. P. Herman, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Social cognition: The Ontario Symposium on Personality and Social Behavior. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1980.
26.
Hastie, R. , & Carlston, D.Theoretical issues in person memory. In R. Hastie, T. Ostrom, E. Ebbesen, R. Wyer, D. Hamilton, & D. Carlston (Eds.), Person memory: The cognitive basis of social perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1980.
27.
Hastie, R. , Ostrom, T., Ebbesen, E., Wyer, R., Hamilton, D., & Carlston, D. (Eds.), Person memory: The cognitive basis of social perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1980.
28.
Heider, F.The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: John Wiley, 1958.
29.
Higgins, E. T. , Herman, C. P., & Zanna, M. P. (Eds.), Social cognition: The Ontario Symposium on Personality and Social Psychology, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1980.
30.
Higgins, E. T. , Kuiper, N. A., & Olson, J. M.Social cognition: A need to get personal. In E. T. Higgins, C. P. Herman, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Social cognition: The Ontario Symposium on Personality and Social Psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1980.
31.
Higgins, E. T. , Rholes, W. S., & Jones, C. R.Category accessibility and impression formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1977, 13, 141-154.
32.
Jones, E. E. & McGillis, D.Correspondent inferences and the attribution cube: A comparative reappraisal. In J. H. Harvey, W. J. lckes, & R. F. Kidd (Eds.), New directions in attribution research. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1976.
33.
Kiesler, C. A. & Lucke, J.Some metatheoretical issues in social psychology. In L. H. Strickland, F. E. Aboud, & K. J. Gergen (Eds.), Social psychology in transition. New York: Plenum, 1976.
34.
Kiesler, C. A. , Collins, B. E., & Miller, N.Attitude change: A critical analysis of theoretical approaches. New York: John Wiley, 1969.
35.
Larkin, J. H. , McDermott, J., Simon, D. P., & Simon, H. A.Models of competence in solving physics problems. Science, 1980, 208. 1335-1342.
36.
Linville, P. W. & Jones, E. E.Polarized appraisals of out-group members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1980, 38. 689-703.
37.
Manis, M.Cognitive social psychology . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1977, 3, 550-566.
38.
Markus, H.Self-schemata and processing information about the self . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1977, 35, 63-78.
39.
Neisser, V.Cognition and reality. San Francisco: Freeman, 1976.
40.
Neisser, V.The limits of cognition. In P. W. Jusczyk & E. M. Klein (Eds.), On the nature of thought: Essays in honor of D. O. Hebb. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1979.
41.
Nisbett, R. E. & Ross, L.Human inference: Strategies and shortcoming in social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1980.
42.
Quine, W. V. & Ullian, J. S.The web of beliefNew York: Random House, 1970.
43.
Reder, L. M.The role of elaborations in memory for prose . Cognitive Psi chologj, 1979, 1l, 221-234.
44.
Rumelhart, D. E. & Ortony, A.The representation of knowledge in memory. In R. C. Anderson, R. J. Spiro, & W. E. Montague (Eds.), Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1977.
45.
Schank, R. & Abelson, R.Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale, NJ: Eribaum, 1977.
46.
Schneider, D. J. , Hastorf, A. H., & Ellsworth, P. C.Person perception (2nd ed.) Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1979.
47.
Simon, H. A.Information-processing theory of human problem solving. In W. K. Estes (Ed.), Handbook of Learning and Cognitive Processes, Vol. 5. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1978.
48.
Smith, E. E.Organization of factual knowledge. Nebraska Syvmposium. Lincoln, NE: Univ. of Nebraska Press, 1980.
49.
Snyder, M. & Uranowitz, S. W.Reconstructing the past: Some cognitive consequences of person perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,, 1978, 36, 941-950.
50.
Tagiuri, R. & Petrullo, L.Person perception and interpersonal behavior. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press, 1958.
51.
Taylor, S. E.The interface of cognitive and social psychology. In J. Harvey (Ed.), Cognition, social behavior, and the environment. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1980.
52.
Taylor, S. E. & Crocker, J.Schematic bases of social information processing. In E. T. Higgins, C. A. Herman, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Social cognition: The Ontario Symposium on Personality and Social Psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1980.
53.
Taylor, S. E. & Fiske, S. T.Getting inside the head: Methodologies for process analysis. In J. Harvey, W. Ickes, & R. Kidd (Eds.), New directions in attribution research, Vol. 3. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, in press.
54.
Tesser, A.Self-generated attitude change. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 11. New York: Academic Press, 1978.
55.
Wicker, A. W.Attitudes vs. actions: The relationship of verbal and overt behavioral responses to attitude objects . Journal of Social Issues, 1969, 4, 41-78.
56.
Wyer, R. S., Jr. , & Srull, T. K.Category accessibility: Some theoretical and empirical issues concerning the processing of social stimulus information. In E. T. Higgins, C. P. Herman, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Social cognition:- The Ontario symposium on personality and social psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1980.
57.
Zadny, J. & Gerard, H. B.Attributed intentions and informational selectivity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1974, 10, 34-52.
58.
Zajonc, R. B.Cognition and social cognition: A historical perspective. In L. Festinger (Ed.), Four decades of social psychology. New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 1980. (a)
59.
Zajonc, R. B.Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences . American Psychologist. 1980, 35, 151-175. (b)
