Illusory causation and illusory correlation, two phenomena which have been observed both in object perception and in person perception, are discussed together with various explanations for these effects. It is proposed that the perception of salient stimuli as causal ma}' reflect the way in which the perceiver picks up information about the environment and that the perception of salient stimuli as correlated may reflect the perceiver's attunement to particular environmental invariants. Research evidence consistent with these propositions is reviewed, and research which would more directly test them is suggested.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
1. Fiske, S. T., Kenny, D. A., & Taylor, S. E.Structural models for the mediation of salience effects on attribution. Unpublished manuscript, 1979.
2.
2. McArthur, L. Z., & Ginsberg. E.Causal attribution to salient stimuli: An investigation of visual fixation mediators. Manuscript submitted for publication, 1980.
3.
Baron, R. M.Social knowing from an ecological event perspective: A consideration of the relative domains of power for cognitive and perceptual modes of knowing. In J. Harvey (Ed.), Cognition, Social Behavior, and the Environment. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1980.
4.
Brunswick, E.The Conceptual Framework of Psychology. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1952.
5.
Chapman, L. J.Illusory correlation in observational report . Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1967, 6, 151-155.
6.
Chapman, L. J. & Chapman, J. P.Genesis of popular but erroneous psycho diagnostic observations. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1967, 72, 193-204.
7.
Eisen. S. V. & McArthur, L. Z.Evaluating and sentencing a defendant as a function of his salience and the perceier's set. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1979, 5. 48-52.
8.
Fiske, S. T.Attention and weight in person perception: The impact of negative and extreme behavior . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1980, 38, 889-908.
9.
Gibson, J. J.The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1966.
10.
Gibson, J. J.The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1979.
11.
Hamilton, D. L. & Gifford, R. K.Illusory correlation in interpersonal perception: A cognitive basis of stereotypic judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1976, 12, 392-407.
12.
Heider, F.Perceiving the Other Person. Paper presented at American Psychological Association Symposium on Theory and Research in Interpersonal Perception, 1954. Reprinted in R. Tagiuri and L. Petrullo (Eds.), Person Perception and lnterpersonal Behavior. Stanford: Stanford Univ. Press, 1958, Pp. 22-26.
13.
Heider, F.The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. New York: John Wiley, 1958.
Heider, F. , & Simmel, M.An experimental study of apparent behavior. American Journal of Psychology, 1944, 57, 243-259.
16.
Jones, E. E. & Davis, K. E.From acts to dispositions. The attribution process in person perception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. Vol. 2. New York: Academic Press, 1965. Pp. 220-266.
17.
Kelley, H. H.The processes of causal attribution . American Psychologist, 1973, 28, 107-113.
18.
Koffka, K.Perceived motion. In Principles ol Gestalt Psychology. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1935.
19.
Massad, C. M. , Hubbard, M., & Newtson, D.Selective perception of events. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1979, I5, 513-532.
20.
McArthur, L. Z.What grabs you: The role of attention in impression formation and causal attribution. In E. T. Higgins, C. P. Herman, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Social Cognition: The Ontario Symposium, Vol. I Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1980.
21.
McArthur, L. Z. & Friedman, S.Illusory correlation in impression formation: Variations in the shared distinctiveness effect as a function of the distinctive person's age, race, and sex. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1980, 39, 615-624.
22.
McArthur, L. Z. & Post, D. L.Figural emphasis and person perception. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1977, 13, 520-535.
23.
McArthur, L. Z. & Solomon, L. K.Perceptions of an aggressive encounter as a function of the victim's salience and the perceiver's arousal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,. 1978, 36, 1278-1290.
24.
Michotte, A.The Perception of Causality. New York: Basic Books, 1963.
25.
Newtson, D. , Rindner, R., Miller, R., & LaCross, K.Effects of availability of feature changes on behavior segmentation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1978, 14, 379-388.
26.
Nisbett, R. & Ross, L.Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1980.
27.
Ohman, A. & Dimberg, U.Facial expressions as conditioned stimuli for electrodermal responses: A case of "preparedness"?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology., 1978, 36, 1251-1258.
28.
Orr, S. & Lanzetta, J.Facial expressions of emotion as conditioned stimuli for human autonomic responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology., 1980,38, 278-282.
29.
Rothbart, M. , Evans, M., & Fulero, S.Recall for confirming events: Memory processes and the maintenance of social stereotypes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychologist. 1979, 15, 343-355.
30.
Rothbart, M. , Fulero, S., Jensen, C., Howard, J., & Birrell, P.From individual to group impressions: Availability heuristics in stereotype formation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1978, 14, 237-255.
31.
Seligman, M. E. P.On the generality of the laws of learning . Psychological Review, 1970, 77, 406-418.
32.
Seligman, M.E.P.Phobias and preparedness . Behavior Therapy, 1971, 2, 307-320.
Taylor, S. E. & Fiske, S.T.Salience, attention, and attribution: Top of the head phenomena. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. Vol. 2. New York: Academic Press, 1978. Pp. 250-288.
