Previous research found that group participation results in predictable shifts in individuals' decisions in a variety of settings. The present study found that the shift in a gambling situation requires knowledge of others' positions. Since such knowledge is central to shifts in an advice-giving setting, the present results provided support for the assumption that the same process underlies various instances of choice shifts.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
1. Stoner, J.A.F. A comparison of individual and group decision involving risk. Master's thesis, School of Industrial Management, M.I.T., 1961.
2.
Baron, R. S. , & Roper, G. A.A reaffirmation of a social comparison view of choice shifts, averaging, and extremity effects in autokinetic situations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1976, 33, 521-530.
3.
Blascovich, J. , Veach, T., & Ginsburg, G.Blackjack and the risky shift. Sociometry, 1973, 36, 42-55.
4.
Burnstein, E. , & Vinokur, A.Persuasive argumentation and social comparison as determinants of attitude polarization. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1977, 13, 315-332.
5.
Levinger, G. , & Schneider, D.Test of the "risk of a value" hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1969, 11, 165-170.
6.
Myers, D. , & Lamm, H.The group polarization phenomenon. Psychological Bulletin, 1976, 83, 602-627.
7.
Pruitt, D. G.Choice shifts in group discussion: An introductory review . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1971, 20, 339-360.
8.
Sanders, G. S.An integration of shifts toward risk and caution in gambling situations . Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1978, 14, 409-416.
9.
Sanders, G. S. , & Baron, R. S.Is social comparison irrelevant for producing choice shifts?Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1977, 13, 303-314.
10.
Sanders, G. S. , Baron, R. S., & Moore, D.Distraction and social comparison as mediators of social facilitation effects. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1978, 14, 291-303.