My suggestion that equity theory only applies to "limited" resource situations has been criticized by Samuel (1978). In this paper, equity theory is examined in regard to situations involving limited and unlimited resources. Consistent with the earlier suggestion, it is concluded that equity theory is inappropriate when resources are unlimited and that it may not apply to certain cases involving limited resources.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adams, J.S.Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Ad-vances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2). New York: Academic Press, 1965.
2.
Rawls, J.A theory of justice. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press, 1971.
3.
Romer, D.Limitations in the equity theory approach: Toward a resolution of the "negative-inputs" controversy . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1977, 3, 228-231.
4.
Samuel, W.Suggested amendments to "New directions in equity research ." Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1976, 2, 36-39.
5.
Samuel, W.Toward a simple but useful equity theory: A comment on the Romer article . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1978, 4, 135-138.
6.
Walster, E. , Bercheid, E., & Walster, G.W.New directions in equity research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1973, 25, 151-176.
