Undergraduate students were asked to perform several interracial behaviors. Half of the subjects were committed to their decisions prior to volunteering; the other half were not. Committed subjects volunteered for fewer behaviors and evaluated the behaviors less positively than did uncommitted subjects. Multiple regression analyses revealed that committed subjects placed the most weight on attitudinal considerations whereas uncommitted subjects placed the most weight on personal norm considerations in making their behavioral decisions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aronson, E. , & Carlsmith, J. M.Experimentation in social psychology. In G. Li-ndzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 2). Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1968.
2.
Fendrich, J. M.A study of the association amorvo verbal attitudes, commitment, and overt behavior in different experimental conditions . Social Forces, 1967, 45, 346-355.
3.
Fishbein, M. , & Ajzen, I.Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1975.
4.
Harkins, S. G. , & Becker, L. A.A psychological perspective interpretation of the attitude-behavior relationship. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1979, in press.
5.
Janis, I. L. , & Mann, L. A.Decision making. New York-: The Free Press, 1977.
6.
Kanouse, D.E. , and Hanson, L.R., Jr.Negativity in evaluations. In E.E. Jones, D.E. Kanouse, H.H. Kelley, R.E. Nisbett, S. Valins and B. Weiner (Eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior. Morristown, N.J.: General Learning Press, 1972.
7.
Kiesler, C.A.The psychology of commitment: Experiments linking behavior to belief. New York: Academic Press, 1971.
8.
Schwartz, S.H. and Tessler, R.C.A test of a model for reducing measured attitude-behavior discrepancies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1972, 24, 225-236.
