The physical attractiveness of the victim of a crime and the victim's precautiousness were varied in a factorial design. The primary finding was an interaction effect on mock jurors' personal verdicts; the defendant was most likely to be convicted when the victim was both beautiful and blameless.
Jones, C. , & Aronson, E.Attribution of fault to a rape victim as a function of the respectability of the victim. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1973, 26, 415-419.
3.
Kalven, H. , & Zeisel, H.The American jury. Boston: Little, Brown, 1966.
4.
Landy, D. , & Aronson, E.The influence of the character of the criminal and his victim on the decision of simulated jurors. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1969, 5, 141-152.
5.
Mosteller, F. , & Tukey, J.Data analysis, including statistics. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1968.
6.
Overall, J., & Spiegel, D. Concerning least squares analysis of experimental data. Psychological Bulletin, 1969, 72, 311-322.
7.
Shaver, K.Defensive attribution: Effects of severity and relevance on the responsibility assigned for an accident . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1970, 14, 101-113.
8.
Sigall, H. , & Ostrove, N.Beautiful but dangerous: Effects of offender attractiveness and nature of the crime on juridic judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975, 31, 410-414.
9.
Thomas, E. , & Hogue, A.Apparent weight of evidence, decision criteria, and confidence ratings in juror decision making. Psychological Review, 1976, 83, 442-465.
