Sixty-one male and female high school students observed male and female models either succeeding or failing on an anagram task. Results on measures of subjects' expectations for their own future performance on the task and estimates of their own ability on the task showed that male subjects were influenced by male models' performance but not female models' performance, while female subjects were not influenced by the performance of either male or female models.
Crandall, V.C.Sex differences in expectancy of intellectual and academic reinforcement. In C.P. Smith (Ed.), Achievement related motives in children. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1969.
3.
Feather, N.T. , and Simon, J.G.Fear of success and causal attribution for outcome. Journal of Personalit, 1973, 41, 525-542.
4.
Himmelweit, H.T.A comparative study of the leverof aspiration of normal and neurotic persons . British Journal of Psychology, 1947, 37, 41-59.
5.
House, W.C. , and Perney, V.Valence of expected and unexpected outcomes as a function of locus of control and type of expectancy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1974, 29, 454-463.
6.
Maccoby, E. , and Jacklin, C.N.The'ptycholoy of sex difTerences. Stanford: Standord University Press, 1974.
7.
Mischel, W.Sex-typing and socialization. In P.H. Mussen (Ed.), Carmichael's manual of child psychology. New York: Wiley, 1970.
8.
Paivio, A. , Yuille, J.C., and Madigan, S.Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1968, 76, (1-1, Pt. 2).
9.
Sarbin, T.R. , and Allen-V.L.Role theory. In G. Lindzey and E. Aronson (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology. 2nd ed.Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1968. Pp. 488-567.
10.
Stake, J.E.The effect of information regarding sex group performance norms on goal-setting in males and females . Sex Roles, 1976, 2, 23-28.
