The relationship between reprimanding individuals for naturally occurring transgressions and their later helping behavior was investigated in two experiments. Admonishing individuals for touching art objects in violation of museum rules or feeding "unauthorized" food to animals in a zoo, increased the likelihood that they would subsequently help a confederate pick up dropped items. Individuals were also more helpful after a severe, rather than a mild reprimand.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Brock, T. & Becker, L."Debriefing" and susceptibility to subsequent experimental manipulations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1966, 2, 314-323.
2.
Carlsmith, J. & Gross, A.Some effects of guilt on compliance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1969, 11, 232-239.
3.
Cialdini, R. , Darby, B. & Vincent, J.Transgression and altruism: A case for hedonism. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1973, 9, 502-516.
4.
Freedman, J. , Wallington, S. & Bless, E.Compliance without pressure: The effect of guilt. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1967, 7, 117-124.
5.
Konecni, V.Some effects of guilt on compliance: A field replication . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1972, 23, 30-32.
6.
Regan, D. , Williams, M. & Sparling, S.Voluntary expiation of guilt: A field experiment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1972, 24, 42-45.
7.
Wallace, J. & Sadalla, E.Behavioral consequences of transgression: The effects of social recognition. Journal of Experimental Research in Personality, 1966, 1, 187-194.
