Previous research has shown that bystanders in groups are less likely to intervene in emergencies than bystanders who are alone (a "numbers effect"). In the present research, in one field and three lab studies, this numbers effect was stronger and there was less help when an emergency could be heard only rather than both seen and heard.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Clark, R. D. III , & Word, L. E.Where is the apathetic bystander?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1974, 29, 279-287.
2.
Latane, B. , & Darley, J. M.The unresponsive bystander. New York: Appleton, 1970.
3.
Piliavin, I. M. , Rodin, J., & Piliavin, J. A.Good samaritanism: an underground phenomenon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1969, 13, 389-399.
4.
Schwartz, S.The justice of need and the activation of humanitarian norms . Journal of Social Issues, 1975, 31, 111-136.
5.
Tilker, H. A.Socially responsible behavior as a function of observer responsibility and victim feedback . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1970, 14, 95-100.
6.
Yakimovich, D. , & Saltz, E.Helping behavior: the cry for help. Psychonomic Science, 1971, f, 427-428.
