Previous crowding research has focused almost exclusively on the individual in group situations. This study varied spatial dimensions for single male occupants of experimental chambers, and examined the effects on selected affective and behavioral measures. More severe spatial restrictions for subjects produced significant increases in feelings of crowding and these feelings were associated with a generally negative affective profile. Factor analyses of semantic scales revealed perceptions of crowding to be relatively independent of general negative affect, subject's role, the closed environment or its temperature. Analysis of variance on behavioral measures in a design simulation showed that restricted subjects were more careful to distribute people within a given space to provide greater interpersonal distances.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aiello, J. R. , Epstein, Y. M., and Karlin, R. A.Effects of crowding on electrodermal activity. Sociological Symposium, 14, 1975.
2.
Campbell, J. D. , & Clarke, J. D.Nearest neighbor tests of significance for nonrandomness in the spatial distribution of singing crickets (Teleogryllus Commodus). Animal Behavior, 1971, 19, 750-756.
3.
Dean, L. M. , Pugh, W. M., & Gunderson, E.K.E.The behavioral effects of crowding: Definitions and methods. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association, Chicago, Illinois, 1975.
4.
Desor, J. A.Toward a psychological theory of crowding . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1972, 21, 79-83.
5.
Freedman, J. L.The crowd: Maybe not so madding after all. Psychology Today, 1971, Sept., 1958.
6.
Griffitt, W.Density, crowding and attraction: What are the relationships? Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association, New Orleans, Louisiana, 1974.
7.
Hall, E. T.The Hidden Dimension. New York: Doubleday, 1966.
8.
Helson, H.Adaptation level theory. New York: Harper & Row, 1964.
9.
James, W., vs. Wallace, G. C. U.S. District Court for Middle District, Montgomery, Alabama, Jan. 13, 1976.
10.
Kaiser, H. F.The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis . Psychometrika, 1958, 23, 187-200.
11.
Lawrence, J.E.S.Science and sentiment: Overview of research on crowding and human behavior . Psychological Bulletin, 1974, 81, 712-720.
12.
Lazarus, R. S. , Speisman, J. C., & Nordkoff, A. M.The relationship between autonomic indicators of psychological stress: Heart rate and skin conductance. Psychosomatic Medicine, 1963, 25, 19-30.
13.
Loo, C. M.Important issues in researching the effects of crowding on humans . Representative Research in Social Psychology, 1974, 4, 219-226.
14.
Marshall, N. J.Privacy and environment . Human Ecology, 1972, 1, 93-110.
15.
McCain, G. , Cox, V. C., & Paulus, P. B.The relationship between illness complaints and degree of crowding in a prison environment. Environment and Behavior, 1976, 8, 2, 283-290.
16.
McKintosh, E. , West, S., & Sargent, S.Two studies of crowding in urban public spaces. Environment and Behavior, 1975, 7, 159-184.
17.
Osgood, C.E. , Suci, G.J., & Tannenbaum, P.H.The measurement of meaning. Urbana, Illinois: University of Illinois Press, 1957.
18.
Paulus, P. , Cox, V., McCain, G., & Chandler, J.Some effects of crowding in a prison environment. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1975, 5, 1, 86-91.
19.
Pugh. J. L., et al. vs. Locke, J. C., Jr., et al. U.S. District Court for Middle District of Alabama. Montggmery, Alabama, Jan. 13, 1976.
20.
Rapoport, A.Toward a redefinition of density . Environment & Behavior, 1975, 7, 133-158.
21.
Schaar, K.Crowding: What's bad for rats may be OK for humans . APA Monitor, 1975, 6, 7.
22.
Schettino, A.P. , & Borden, R.J.Sex differences in response to naturalistic crowding: Affective reaction to group size and group density. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1976, 2, 67-70.
23.
Sommer, R.Small groups ecology . Psychological Bulletin, 1967, 67, 145-152.
24.
Sommer, R.Personal space: The behavioral basis of design. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, 1969.
25.
Stokols, D.A socialapsychological model of human crowding phenomena . Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 1972a, 38, 72-83.
26.
Stokols, D.On the distinction between density and crowding: Some implications for future research . Psychological Review, 1972b, 79, 275-277.
27.
Wyatt vs. Stickney. U.S. District Court for Middle District of Alabama, Federal Supplement, 1972, 373-386.
