The effects of information about workers' responses to previous payment on subsequent allocation decisions were examined. College students played the role of supervisors who had to set fair pay rates for salesmen, or rates that would motivate high performance. Subjects redressed inequity by giving high pay to improving performers who were previously low paid, and low pay to declining performers who were previously high paid. Subjects instructed to motivate avoided previously ineffective allocations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adams, J. S.Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2). New York, Academic Press, 1965.
2.
Goodstadt, B. , & Kipnis, D.Situational influences on the use of power. Journal ofApplied Psychology, 1970, 54, 201-207.
3.
Greenberg, J. , & Leventhal, G. S.Equity and the use of overreward to motivate performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1976, 34, 179-190.
4.
Kelley, H. H. , Thibaut, J. W., Radloff, R., & Mundy, D.The development of cooperation in the "minimal social situation."Psychological Monographs, 1962, 76, Whole No. 19.
5.
Lanzatta, J. T. , & Hannah, T. E.Reinforcing behavior of "naive" trainers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1969,11, 245-252.
6.
Rothbart, M.Effects of motivation, equity, and compliance on the use of reward and punishment . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1968, 9, 353-362.
