Gergen (1973) presented the thesis that social psychology is primarily an historical inquiry. The implications of his paper are very significant for the status of social psychology as a scien tific discipline. In defense of traditional science Schlenker (1974) presented a strong rebuttal, focussing on five major issues; the nature of theoretical abstractness, the search for regularity, open systems, the conditional nature of scientific propositions, and the uniqueness of events. The present paper considers the Gergen- Schlenker debate within the context of these five issues. The analyses indicate that Schlenker's rebuttal arguments are not de finitive, and that Gergen's thesis still awaits a decisive answer.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Buss, A.R.The emerging field of the sociology of psychological knowledge. American Psychologist, 1975, 30, 988-1002.
2.
Coan, R.W.Toward a psychological interpretation of psychology. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 1973, 9, 313-327.
3.
Cohen, H.R.Dialectics and scientific revolutions. Science & Society , 1973, 37, 326-336.
4.
Collingwood, R.G.An essay on metaphysics. Chicago: Regnery, 1972.
5.
Collins, R.Conflict sociology: Toward an explanatory science. New York: Academic Press, 1975.
6.
Cronbach, L.J.Beyond the two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 1975, 30, 116-127.
7.
Elms, A.C.The crisis of confidence in social psychology. American Psychologist , 1975, 30, 967-976.
8.
Gergen, K.J.Social psychology as history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1973, 26, 309-320.
9.
Gergen, K.J.Social psychology, science and history. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1976, 2, 373-383.
10.
Greenwald, A.G.Transhistorical lawfulness of behavior: A comment on two papers. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1976, 2, 391.
11.
Holton, G.On the role of themata in scientific thought. Science , 1975, 188, 328-334.
12.
Israel, J., & Tajfel, H. (Eds). The context of social psychology: A critical assessment . New York: Academic Press, 1972.
13.
Keniston, K.Psychological development and historical change. Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 1971, 2, 329-345.
14.
Kuhn, T.S.The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press , 1970.
15.
Manis, M.Comment on Gergen's "Social psychology as history". Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1975, 1, 450-455.
16.
McGuire, W.J.The yin and yang of progress in social psychology: Seven koan. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1973 , 26, 446-456.
17.
Nagel, E.The structure of science: Problems in the logic of scientific explanations . New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1961.
18.
Piaget, J.Structuralism. New York: Basic Books , 1970.
19.
Rychlak, J.F.A philosophy of science of personality theory. Boston, Mass.: Houghton Mifflin, 1968.
20.
Schlenker, B.R.Social psychology and science. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1974, 29, 1-15.
21.
Schutz, A.The phenomenology of the social world. Evanston, Ill.: . Northwestern University Press, 1967.
22.
Scriven, M.Views of human nature. In T. W. Wann (Ed.), Behaviorism and phenomenology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1964.
23.
Smith, M.B.Is experimental social psychology advancing?Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1972, 8, 86-96.
24.
Smith, M.B.Criticism of a social science. Science, 1973 , 180, 610-612.
25.
Stent, G.S.Limits to the scientific understanding of man. Science , 1975, 187, 1052-1057.
26.
Thorngate, W.Process invariance: Another red herring. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1975, 1, 485-488.
27.
Triandis, H.C.Social psychology and cultural analysis. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 1975, 5. 81-106.
