Systematic observation of social interaction, noting the presence or absence of predefined behaviors in an ongoing stream of behavior, can result in an overwhelming mass of data. The central thesis of this report is that a few simple conceptual and analytic tools greatly facilitate the handling of such data. Various ways of representing observational data are discussed, and implications are included showing analyses of mother-infant, monkey- monkey, and human adult-adult interaction.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Sackett, G.P.A nonparametric lag sequential analysis for studying dependency among responses in observational scoring systems. Unpublished manuscript, University of Washington, 1974.
2.
Bakeman, R.Data analyzing procedures (Tech. Rep. 2). Atlanta : Georgia State University, Infancy Laboratory, January 1975.
3.
Stokes, N.A., III.Sequential analysis of looking and talking during agreement and disagreement . Unpublished Master's thesis, Georgia State University .
4.
Altmann, S.A.Sociobiology of rhesus monkeys. II. Stochastics of social communication . Journal of Theoretical Biology, 1965, 8, 490-552.
5.
Bakeman, R.Untangling streams of behavior: Sequential analyses of observation data. In G. P. Sackett & H. C. Haywood (Eds.), Application of observational-ethological methods to the study of mental retardation, in press.
6.
Bakeman, R., & Brown, J.V.Behavioral dialogues: An approach to the assessment of mother-infant interaction . Child Development, in press.
7.
Brown, J.V., Bakeman, R., Snyder, P.A., Fredrickson, W.T., Morgan, S.T., & Hepler, R.Interactions of black inner-city mothers with their newborn infants . Child Development, 1975, 46, 677-686.
8.
Cook, T.D., & Campbell, D.T.The design and conduct of quasi-experiments and true experiments in field settings. Chap. 7 in M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational research. New York: Rand-McNally , 1975.
9.
Duncan, S.J.Some signals and rules for taking turns in conversations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1972 , 23, 283-292.
10.
Exline, R.V.Visual interaction: The glances of power and preference. In J. Cole (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation, 1971. Lincoln: University of Nebraska, 1972.
11.
Goffman, E.Relations in public. New York: Basic Books, 1971.
12.
Jaffe, J., & Feldstein, S.Rhythms of dialogue. New York: Academic Press, 1970.
13.
Kendon, A.Some functions of gaze direction in social interaction. Acta Psychologica, 1967, 26, 22-63.
14.
Selleck, J., & Bakeman, R.Procedures for the analysis of form: Two computer applications. Journal of Music Theory, 1965, 9, 281-293.
15.
Stern, D.N.Mother and infant at play: The dyadic interaction involving facial, vocal, and gaze behaviors. In M. Lewis & L. A. Rosenblum (Eds.), The effect of the infant on its caregiver. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1974.
16.
Thomas, D.S.,.Loomis, A.M., & Arrington, R.E.Observational studies of social behavior: Volume I--Social behavior patterns. New Haven: Institute of Human Relations, Yale University, 1933.
