This is an effort to frame the core meaning of "person ality theory," and to show how all personality theorists have made certain assumptions in common about the nature of behavior. Exam ples are given from the leading personality theories of history. It is argued that the personality theorists of the future must broaden their roles, and work more generally as "identity advocates" in all realms of psychology.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Allport, G. W. Personality: A psychological interpretation. New York: Holt, 1937.
Bowers, K.S.Situationism in psychology: An analysis and a critique. Psychological Review, 1973, 80, 307-336.
4.
Brewer, W.F.There is no convincing evidence for operant or classical conditioning in adult humans. In W. B. Weimer & D. S. Palermo (Eds.), Cognition and the symbolic process. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1974.
5.
Burtt, E.A.The metaphysical foundations of modern physical science (Rev. ed.). Garden City, N. Y.: Doubleday & Co., 1955.
6.
Cattell, R. B. Personality: A systematic, theoretical, and factual study. New York : McGraw-Hill, 1950.
7.
Cronbach, L.J.Beyond the two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 1975, 30, 116-127.
8.
Erikson, E.H.Life history and the historical noment. New York: W. W. Norton & Co., Inc., 1975.
9.
Eysenck, H.J.The structure of human personality. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1953.
10.
Freud, S.The origins of psycho-analysis, letters to Wilhelm Fliess, drafts and notes: 1887-1902. New York: Basic Books , 1954.
11.
Hall, C.S., & Lindzey, G.Theories of personality. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1970.
12.
Hebb, D.O.What psychology is about. American Psychologist, 1974, 29, 71-79.
13.
Kruglanski, A.W.Theory, experiment and the shifting publication scene in personality and social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1975, 1, 489-496.
14.
Kuhn, T.W.The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1970.
15.
Maslow, A.H.Motivation and personality. New York: Harper & Row, 1954.
16.
McGuire, W. (Ed.). The Freud/Jung letters . Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press, 1974.
17.
Meehl, P.E.When shall we use our heads instead of the formula?Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1957, 4, 268-273.
18.
Mischel, W.Toward a cognitive social learning reconceptualization of personality. Psychological Review, 1973, 80, 252-283.
19.
Morgan, C.D., & Murray, H.A.A method for investigating phantasies. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry, 1935, 34, 289-306.
20.
Murphy, G. Personality: A biosocial approach to origins and structure. New York : Harper, 1947.
21.
Murray, H.A. (and collaborators). Explorations in personality. New York: Oxford, 1938.
22.
Orne, M.T.On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: With particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications. American Psychologist, 1962, 17, 776-783.
23.
Page, M.M.Demand characteristics and the verbal operant conditioning experiment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1972, 23, 304-308.
24.
Penfield, W.The mystery of the mind. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1975.
Popper, K.Normal science and its dangers. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970.
27.
Rogers, C.R.Learning to be free. In S. M. Farber & R. H. L. Wilson (Eds.), Control of the mind (Vol. 2). Conflict and creativity. New York : McGraw-Hill, 1963.
28.
Rogers, C.R., & Skinner, B.F.Some issues concerning the control of human behavior: A symposium. Science, 1956, 124, 1057-1066.
29.
Rosenthal, R.Experimenter effects in behavioral research. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1966.
30.
Rychlak, J.F.A philosophy of science for personality theory. Boston : Houghton-Mifflin, 1968.
31.
Rychlak, J.F.Introduction to personality and psychotherapy: A theory-construction approach . Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1973.
32.
Rychlak, J.F.A humanist looks at psychological science. In W. J. Arnold & J. K. Cole (Eds.), Nebraska symposium on motivation. (Vol. XXII). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1975.
33.
Rychlak, J. F. (Ed.), Dialectic: Humanistic rationale for behavior and development. Basel: S. Karger AG, 1976.
34.
Rychlak, J.F.The psychology of rigorous humanism. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., in press.
35.
Sheldon, W.H. (with collab. of S.S. Stevens and W.B. Tucker). The varieties of human physique: An introduction to constitutional psychology. New York: Harper, 1940.
36.
Stace, W.T.The philosophy of Hegel. New York: Dover Pub., 1955.
37.
Sullivan, H.S.The fusion of psychiatry and social science. New York: W. W. Norton & Co., Inc., 1964.
38.
Wandersman, A. H., Poppen, P. J., & Ricks, D. F. (Eds.), Humanism and behaviorism: Dialogue and growth. Elmsford, N. Y.: Pergamon Press, 1976.
39.
Wann, T. W. (Ed.), Behaviorism and phenomenology: Contracting bases for modern psychology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1964.
40.
Watson, J.B.Behaviorism. New York: W. W. Norton & Co., Inc., 1924.
41.
Wightman, W.P.D.The growth of scientific ideas. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1951.
