Abstract
Two sets of values are presumed to be operating at cross purposes in the implementation of affirmative action programs. On the one hand, universities are committed to excellence by rewarding ability and quality productivity. On the other hand, universities have also committed themselves to the promotion of social justice by helping disadvantaged groups achieve parity. The conflict between these two persuasions have led some to label affirmative action perjoratively, "affirmative discrimination." The DeFunis case epitomizes the sentiment against affirmative action. Considerations for recruitment are discussed, including curriculum modification for a successful or more effective outcome.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
