Integration and Attribution Theories as Predictors of Sentencing by a Simulated Jury

Anderson, N.H. Likableness ratings of 555 personality-trait words. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1968, 9, 272-279. (a)

Anderson, N.H. A simple model for information integration. In R. P. Abelson , E. Aronson , W. J. McGuire , T. M. Newcomb , M. J. Rosenberg , & P. H. Tannenbaum (eds.), Theories of cognitive inconsistency: A sourcebook.Chicago : Rand McNally, 1968 (b).

Anderson, N.H. Runctional measurement and psychophysical judgment. Psychological Review, 1970, 77, 153-170.

Anderson N.H. Integration theory and attitude change. Psychological Review , 1971, 78 171-206.

Heider, F. The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley, 1958.

Jones, E.E. , & Davis, K.E. From acts to dispositions. In L Berkowitz (ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology. Vol. 2. New York: Academic Press, 1965.

Kelley, H.H. Attribution in social interaction. Morristown, New Jersey : General Learning Press, 1971.

Kelley, H.H. Attribution theory in social psychology. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1967, 15, 192-238.

Landy, D. , & Aronson, E. The influence of the character of the criminal and his victim on simulated jurors. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1969, 5, 141-152.

Mitchell, H.E. , & Byrne, D. The defendant's dilemma: Effects of jurors' attitudes and authoritarianism on judicial decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 1973, 25, 123-129.

Nemeth, C. , & Sosis, R.H. A simulated jury study:, Characteristics of the defendant and the jurors. The Journal of Social Psychology, 1973, 90, 221-229.