More Results on Increasing the Persuasiveness of a Low Prestige Communicator: The Effects of the Communicator's Physical Attractiveness and Sex of the Receiver
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online February, 1974
More Results on Increasing the Persuasiveness of a Low Prestige Communicator: The Effects of the Communicator's Physical Attractiveness and Sex of the Receiver
Milbourn, M.T. & Stone, V.A.Source-message orientation and components of source credibilityJournalism Quarterly, 1970, 49, 663-668.
2.
Mills, J. & Aronson, E.Opinion change as a function of communicator's attractiveness and desire to influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 1965, 1, 173-177.
3.
Mills, J. & Harvey, J.Opinion change as a function of when information about the communicator is received and whether he is attractive or expert. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 1972, 21, 52-55.
4.
Snyder, M. & Rothbart, M.Communicator attractiveness and opinion change. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 1971, 3, 377-387.
5.
Stone, V.A. & Chaffee,S.A.Family communication patterns and source-message orientation. Journalism Quarterly, 1970, 47, 239-246.
6.
Stone, V.A. & Eswara, H.S.The likeability and self-interest of the source in attitude change . Journalism Quarterly, 1969, 46, 61-68.
7.
Walster, E., Aronson, E., & Abrahams, D.On increasing the persuasiveness of low prestige communicator. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1966, 4, 508-516.
