Abstract
Passion is often celebrated as a driver of success, yet it also serves as a social cue that shapes moral expectations. Across five studies (N = 1,849), we examine how perceptions of obsessive versus harmonious passion influence workplace inferences and decisions. Obsessively passionate individuals are perceived as more likely to engage in goal-instrumental unethical behavior than harmoniously passionate or less passionate counterparts. These expectations guide selection: obsessively passionate individuals are disproportionately chosen for roles involving morally questionable conduct. This preference emerges even when obsessive passion is viewed as no more ethically risky than low self-control, suggesting that anticipated immorality is not penalized uniformly. Rather, obsessive passion pairs moral suspicion with valued qualities (e.g., dedication, drive), making ethical flexibility seem instrumentally useful. Passion type thus functions as a moral cue shaping how people are evaluated and deployed at work, raising concerns that organizations may inadvertently reinforce boundary crossing by rewarding “passion.”
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
