The United States is characterized as having relatively weak social norms compared to other countries. However, this characterization may be an oversimplification due to the cultural diversity that exists within the country. Four studies (N = 1,537) examined whether and why U.S. racial minorities (East Asian, Latinx, and African Americans) perceive their racial community’s norms to be significantly stronger than European Americans and White immigrants to the United States (Studies 1–4). This difference was not due to increased perceived discrimination (Study 3) or concerns about out-group member punishment (Study 4). Instead, racial minorities’ stronger perceptions of community norms were motivated primarily by interdependence (Studies 1–4) and concerns about being punished by in-group members for not following norms (Study 4). These findings illustrate differences in norm strength between racial groups in a single country, deepening our understanding of how social norm perceptions may vary in a multicultural society.
AnollA. P. (2022). The obligation mosaic: Race and social norms in US political participation. University of Chicago Press.
2.
BaldwinM.MussweilerT. (2018). The culture of social comparison. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(39), E9067–E9074. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1721555115
BicchieriC. (2014). Norms, conventions, and the power of expectations. Oxford University Press.
5.
BondR.SmithP. B. (1996). Culture and conformity: A meta-analysis of studies using Asch’s (1952b, 1956) line judgment task. Psychological Bulletin, 119(1), 111–137. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.119.1.111
6.
BrownA. K. (2013). Cultural Perspective on African American Culture. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 1(2), 54–68.
7.
CamposB.KimH. S. (2017). Incorporating the cultural diversity of family and close relationships into the study of health. American Psychologist, 72(6), 543–554. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000122
8.
CarpenterS. (2000). Effects of cultural tightness and collectivism on self-concept and causal attributions. Cross-Cultural Research, 34(1), 38–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/106939710003400103
9.
ChiuC. Y.GelfandM. J.YamagishiT.ShteynbergG.WanC. (2010). Intersubjective culture: The role of intersubjective perceptions in cross-cultural research. Perspectives on Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 5(4), 482–493. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610375562
10.
ChuaR. Y. J.HuangK. G.JinM. (2019). Mapping cultural tightness and its links to innovation, urbanization, and happiness across 31 provinces in China. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(14), 6720–6725. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1815723116
11.
CohenD.KitayamaS. (2019). Handbook of cultural psychology. Guilford Publications.
12.
DawsonM. C. (1995). Behind the Mule: Race and Class in African-American Politics. Princeton University Press.
13.
de MooijM.BeniflahJ. (2017). Measuring cross-cultural differences of ethnic groups within nations: Convergence or divergence of cultural values? The case of the United States. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 29(1), 2–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/08961530.2016.1227758
DuckittJ.BizumicB.KraussS. W.HeledE. (2010). A tripartite approach to right-wing authoritarianism: The authoritarianism-conservatism-traditionalism model. Political Psychology, 31(5), 685–715.
16.
EomK.KimH. S. (2015). Intersubjective norms: Cultural and interpersonal perspective. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 46(10), 1313–1316. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022115600262
FindlingM. G.BleichS. N.CaseyL. S.BlendonR. J.BensonJ. M.SaydeJ. M.MillerC. (2019). Discrimination in the United States: Experiences of Latinos. Health Services Research, 54(S2), 1409–1418. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.13216
19.
GelfandM. J.NishiiL. H.RaverJ. L. (2006). On the nature and importance of cultural tightness-looseness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(6), 1225–1244. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1225
20.
GelfandM. J.RaverJ. L.NishiiL.LeslieL. M.LunJ.LimB. C.DuanL.AlmaliachA.AngS.ArnadottirJ.AycanZ.BoehnkeK.BoskiP.CabecinhasR.ChanD.ChhokarJ.D’AmatoA.FerrerM.FischlmayrI. C.. . . YamaguchiS. (2011). Differences between tight and loose cultures: A 33-nation study. Science, 332(6033), 1100–1104. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1197754
21.
Golash-BozaT.DarityW. (2008). Latino racial choices: The effects of skin colour and discrimination on Latinos’ and Latinas’ racial self-identifications. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 31(5), 899–934. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870701568858
HaberstrohS.OysermanD.SchwarzN.KühnenU.JiL. J. (2002). Is the interdependent self more sensitive to question context than the independent self? Self-construal and the observation of conversational norms. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(3), 323–329. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.2001.1513
24.
HarringtonJ. R.GelfandM. J. (2014). Tightness–looseness across the 50 United States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(22), 7990–7995. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1317937111
HeineS. J.LehmanD. R.PengK.GreenholtzJ. (2002). What’s wrong with cross-cultural comparisons of subjective Likert scales?: The reference-group effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 903–918. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.903
27.
HoA. K.RobertsS. O.GelmanS. A. (2015). Essentialism and racial bias jointly contribute to the categorization of multiracial individuals. Psychological Science, 26(10), 1639–1645. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615596436
28.
JacksonJ. C.GelfandM.EmberC. R. (2020). A global analysis of cultural tightness in non-industrial societies. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 287(1930), Article 20201036. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2020.1036
29.
JollyP. M.HoofH. V.ChenF.KimB.DuranM. E.NavasA. C.ValleJ. G.PérezG. M. (2021). Quantifying cultural tightness-looseness in Ecuador. PLoS One, 16(1), Article e0246064. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246064
30.
KhumaloI. P.Wilson-FadijiA.BrouwersS. A. (2020). Well-being orientations and time perspective across cultural tightness–Looseness latent classes in Africa. Journal of Happiness Studies, 21(5), 1681–1703. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-019-00151-5
31.
KitayamaS. (2002). Culture and basic psychological processes—Toward a system view of culture: Comment on Oyserman et al. (2002). Psychological Bulletin, 128(1), 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.128.1.89
32.
KitayamaS.SalvadorC. E. (2017). Culture embrained: Going beyond the nature-nurture dichotomy. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(5), 841–854. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617707317
KitayamaS.SalvadorC. E.NanakdewaK.RossmaierA.San MartinA.SavaniK. (2022). Varieties of interdependence and the emergence of the Modern West: Toward the globalizing of psychology. American Psychologist, 77(9), 991–1006. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001073
35.
KnowlesE. D.LoweryB. S.ChowR. M.UnzuetaM. M. (2014). Deny, distance, or dismantle? How White Americans manage a privileged identity. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 594–609. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614554658
36.
KomarrajuM.CokleyK. O. (2008). Horizontal and vertical dimensions of individualism-collectivism: A comparison of African Americans and European Americans. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology, 14(4), 336–343. https://doi.org/10.1037/1099-9809.14.4.336
37.
LeeR. T.PerezA. D.BoykinC. M.Mendoza-DentonR. (2019). On the prevalence of racial discrimination in the United States. PLoS One, 14(1), Article e0210698. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210698
38.
LiH. Z.ZhangZ.BhattG.YumY. O. (2006). Rethinking culture and self-construal: China as a Middle Land. The Journal of Social Psychology, 146(5), 591–610. https://doi.org/10.3200/SOCP.146.5.591-610
39.
LopezH.DevosT.SomoA. (2022). State-level cultural tightness–looseness accounts for implicit associations between American and White identities. Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology, 3, Article 100033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cresp.2021.100033
40.
MarkusH. R.KitayamaS. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224.
41.
MuY.KitayamaS.HanS.GelfandM. J. (2015). How culture gets embrained: Cultural differences in event-related potentials of social norm violations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(50), 15348–15353. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1509839112
42.
NaJ.GrossmannI.VarnumM. E. W.KitayamaS.GonzalezR.NisbettR. E. (2010). Cultural differences are not always reducible to individual differences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(14), 6192–6197. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1001911107
43.
NakanoD. Y. (2013). An interlocking panethnicity: The negotiation of multiple identities among Asian American social movement leaders. Sociological Perspectives, 56(4), 569–595. https://doi.org/10.1525/sop.2013.56.4.569
44.
NezlekJ. B.KafetsiosK.SmithC. V. (2008). Emotions in everyday social encounters: Correspondence between culture and self-construal. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39(4), 366–372. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022108318114
45.
OlaniyanT. (2017). African-American critical discourse and the invention of cultural identities. African American Review, 50(4), 877–889.
46.
OysermanD.CoonH. M.KemmelmeierM. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 3–72. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.128.1.3
47.
ParkJ.KitayamaS. (2014). Interdependent selves show face-induced facilitation of error processing: Cultural neuroscience of self-threat. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(2), 201–208. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nss125
48.
PrattoF.ÇidamA.StewartA. L.ZeineddineF. B.ArandaM.AielloA.ChryssochoouX.CichockaA.CohrsJ. C.DurrheimK.EicherV.FoelsR.GórskaP.LeeI.-C.LicataL.LiuJ. H.LiL.MeyerI.MorselliD.. . . HenkelK. E. (2013). Social dominance in context and in individuals: Contextual moderation of robust effects of social dominance orientation in 15 Languages and 20 Countries. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4(5), 587–599. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550612473663
49.
RotzingerJ. S.JensenL. A.ThalmayerA. G. (2025). Ubuntu in Namibia and Kenya: How emerging adults live an essential African value today. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 56(2), 194–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220221241309863
50.
SalvadorC. E.Idrovo CarlierS.IshiiK.Torres CastilloC.NanakdewaK.Canale SegoviaF.San MartinA.SavaniK.KitayamaS. (2025). Self-enhancement in Latin America: Is it linked to interdependence?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 00(0), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672241309387
51.
SalvadorC. E.Idrovo CarlierS.IshiiK.Torres CastilloC.NanakdewaK.San MartinA.SavaniK.KitayamaS. (2024). Emotionally expressive interdependence in Latin America: Triangulating through a comparison of three cultural zones. Emotion, 24(3), 820–835. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0001302
52.
SalvadorC. E.KrausB. T.AckermanJ. M.GelfandM. J.KitayamaS. (2020). Interdependent self-construal predicts reduced sensitivity to norms under pathogen threat: An electrocortical investigation. Biological Psychology, 157, Article 107970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2020.107970
53.
SidaniusJ.PrattoF. (2001). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge University Press.
54.
SmithC. W.Lopez BunyasiT.SmithJ. C. (2019). Linked fate over time and across generations. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 7(3), 684–694. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2019.1638801
55.
SmithP. B.FischerR. (2008). Acquiescence, extreme response bias and culture: A multilevel analysis. In vanF. J. R.Vijver de van HemertD. A.PoortingaY. H. (Eds.), Multilevel analysis of individuals and cultures (pp. 285–314). Psychology Press.
56.
StepickA.StepickC. D. (2002). Becoming American, constructing ethnicity: Immigrant youth and civic engagement. Applied Developmental Science, 6(4), 246–257. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532480XADS0604_12
57.
ThomsonR.YukiM.TalhelmT.SchugJ.KitoM.AyanianA. H.BeckerJ. C.BeckerM.ChiuC.ChoiH.-S.FerreiraC. M.FülöpM.GulP.Houghton-IlleraA. M.JoasooM.JongJ.KavanaghC. M.KhutkyyD.ManziC.. . . VissermanM. L. (2018). Relational mobility predicts social behaviors in 39 countries and is tied to historical farming and threat. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(29), 7521–7526. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1713191115
58.
TomaselloM.MelisA. P.TennieC.WymanE.HerrmannE. (2012). Two key steps in the evolution of human cooperation: The interdependence hypothesis. Current Anthropology, 53(6), 673–692. https://doi.org/10.1086/668207
59.
TriandisH. C.GelfandM. J. (1998). Converging measurement of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(1), 118–128. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.1.118
60.
UugwangaS. N.NaudéL.ThalmayerA. G. (2025). Becoming an Ovambo adult: Growing into agentic communalism in Sub-Saharan Africa. Psychological Science, 36(1), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976241311920
61.
VargasJ. H.KemmelmeierM. (2013). Ethnicity and contemporary American culture: A meta-analytic investigation of horizontal–vertical individualism–collectivism. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44(2), 195–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022112443733
62.
WeavingM.GelfandM. J. (2024). Majority rule: Do minorities live in “tighter” social worlds?Current Opinion in Psychology, 60, Article 101885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2024.101885
63.
WeigelR. H.VernonD. T. A.TognacciL. N. (1974). Specificity of the attitude as a determinant of attitude-behavior congruence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30(6), 724–728. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0037540
64.
WhiteI. K.LairdC. N. (2020). Steadfast democrats: How social forces shape Black political behavior. In Steadfast Democrats. Princeton University Press.
65.
WilliamsD. R.YUY.JacksonJ. S.AndersonN. B. (1997). Racial differences in physical and mental health: Socioeconomic status, stress and discrimination. Journal of Health Psychology, 2, 335–351.
66.
ZouL. X.CheryanS. (2017). Two axes of subordination: A new model of racial position. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112(5), 696–717. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000080
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
