Lack of belonging can negatively affect mental and physical health, but experiences with social rejection are routine. Two studies examined whether being unable to mitigate the risk of rejection in real-world relationships motivates people to defensively immerse themselves in symbolic social bonds with celebrities and fictional characters. Study 1 (four daily diary samples) and Study 2 (cross-sectional sample) operationalized the ability to mitigate risk (i.e., the ability to self-protect) through the amount of time spent in the physical company of potentially hurtful/rejecting close others. In both studies, unmitigated risk (i.e., spending more time with potentially hurtful/rejecting close others) predicted increased/greater engagement with symbolic social bonds. These studies are the first to reveal specific characteristics of social rejection experiences that motivate escape into symbolic social bonds.
BarrD. J.LevyR.ScheepersC.TilyH. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68, 255–278.
BaumeisterR. F.LearyM. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529.
4.
BaumeisterR. F.StillwellA.WotmanS. R. (1990). Victim and perpetrator accounts of interpersonal conflict: Autobiographical narratives about anger. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(5), 994–1005.
5.
BolgerN.LaurenceauJ. P. (2013). Methodology in the social sciences. Intensive longitudinal methods: An introduction to diary and experience-sampling research. Guilford Press.
CavalloJ. V.FitzsimonsG. M.HolmesJ. G. (2010). When self-protection overreaches: Relationship-specific threat activates domain-general avoidance motivation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 1–8.
8.
CohenJ. (2005). Global and local viewing experiences in the age of multi-channel television: The Israeli experience. Communication Theory, 15, 437–455.
9.
CollinsH. K.HagertyS. F.QuoidbachJ.BrooksA. (2022). Relational diversity in social portfolios predicts well-being. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 119, e2120668119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2120668119
10.
CurranP. J.HussongA. M. (2009). Integrative data analysis: The simultaneous analysis of multiple data sets. Psychological Methods, 14(2), 81–100.
11.
DerrickJ. L.GabrielS.HugenbergK. (2009). Social surrogacy: How favored television programs provide the experience of belonging. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 352–362.
12.
DerrickJ. L.GabrielS.TippinB. (2008). Parasocial relationships and self-discrepancies: Faux relationships have benefits for low self-esteem individuals. Personal Relationships, 15, 261–280.
13.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.BuchnerA.LangA.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160.
14.
FinkenauerC.KerkhofP.RighettiF.BranjeS. (2009). Living together apart: Perceived concealment as a signal of exclusion in marital relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 1410–1422.
15.
GabrielS.ReadJ. P.YoungA. F.BachrachR. L.TroisiJ. (2017). Social surrogate use in those exposed to trauma: I get by with a little help from my (fictional) friends. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 36, 41–63.
16.
GabrielS.ValentiJ.YoungA. F. (2016). Watching, reading, and eating your way to belonging: Symbolic social relationships and the social self. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 53, 189–243.
17.
GardnerW. L.KnowlesM. L. (2008). Love makes you real: Favorite television characters are perceived as “real” in a social facilitation paradigm. Social Cognition, 26, 156–168.
18.
GillathO.MikulincerM.FitzsimonsG. M.ShaverP. R.SchachnerD. A.BarghJ. A. (2006). Automatic activation of attachment-related goals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1375–1388.
19.
GoldsteinH.RasbashJ.PlewisI.DraperD.BrownW.YangM.WoodhouseG.HealyM. (1998). A user’s guide to MlwiN. Multilevel Models Project, Institute of Education, University of London.
20.
GomillionS.GabrielS.KawakamiK.YoungA. F. (2017). Let’s stay home and watch TV: The benefits of shared media use for close relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 34(6), 855–874.
21.
GötzF. M.GoslingS. D.RentfrowP. J. (2021). Small effects: The indispensable foundation for a cumulative psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 17, 205–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620984483
22.
IkeK. G.de BoerS. F.BuwaldaB.KasM. J. (2020). Social withdrawal: An initially adaptive behavior that becomes maladaptive when expressed excessively. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 116, 251–267.
23.
KanazawaS. (2002). Bowling with our imaginary friends. Evolution and Human Behavior, 23, 167–171.
24.
KaneH. S.McCallC.CollinsN. L.BlascovichJ. (2012). Mere presence is not enough: Responsive support in a virtual world. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 37–44.
25.
KniefU.ForstmeierW. (2021). Violating the normality assumption may be the lesser of two evils. Behavior Research Methods, 53, 2576–2590.
26.
KrossE.BermanM. G.MischelW.SmithE. E.WagerT. D. (2011). Social rejection shares somatosensory representations with physical pain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 108(15), 6270–6275. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1102693108
27.
LakinJ. L.ChartrandT. L.ArkinR. M. (2008). I am too just like you: Nonconscious mimicry as an automatic behavioral response to social exclusion. Psychological Science, 19(8), 816–822. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02162.x
28.
LearyM.TamborE.TerdalS. K.DownsD. L. (1995). Self-esteem as an interpersonal monitor: The sociometer hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 518–530.
29.
LearyM. R.BaumeisterR. F. (2000). The nature and function of self-esteem: Sociometer theory. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 32 (pp. 2–51). Academic Press.
30.
LearyM. R.GabrielS. (2022). The relentless pursuit of acceptance and belonging. Advances in Motivational Science, 9, 135–178.
31.
LearyM. R.TwengeJ. M.QuinlivanE. (2006). Interpersonal rejection as a determinant of anger and aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 111–132.
32.
LeeR. M.RobbinsS. B. (1995). Measuring belongingness: The Social Connectedness and the Social Assurance scales. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 42(2), 232–241.
33.
LorahJ. (2018). Effect size measures for multilevel models: Definition, interpretation, and TIMSS example. Large-Scale Assessments in Education, 6, Article 8.
34.
LotunS.LamarcheV. M.Matran-FernandezA.SandstornG. M. (2024). People perceive parasocial relationships to be effective at fulfilling emotional needs. Scientific Reports, 14, 8185. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-58069-9
35.
ManerJ. K.DeWallC. N.BaumeisterR. F.SchallerM. (2007). Does social exclusion motivate interpersonal reconnection? Resolving the “porcupine problem.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(1), 42–55. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.42
36.
MathieuJ. E.AguinisH.CulpepperS. A.ChenG. (2012). Understanding and estimating the power to detect cross-level interaction effects in multilevel modeling. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 951–966.
37.
MacdonaldG.LearyM. R. (2005). Why does social exclusion hurt? The relationship between social and physical pain. Psycholological Bulletin, 131(2), 202–223.
38.
McNultyJ. K.RussellV. M. (2010). When “negative” behaviors are positive: A contextual analysis of the long-term effects of problem-solving behaviors on changes in relationship satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(4), 587–604.
39.
MinisteroL. M.GreenM. C.GabrielS.ValentiJ. (2022). Back where I belong: Rereading as a risk-free pathway to social connection. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 16(1), 97.
40.
MurrayS. L.DerrickJ.LederS.HolmesJ. G. (2008). Balancing connectedness and self-protection goals in close relationships: A levels of processing perspective on risk regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 429–459.
41.
MurrayS. L.HolmesJ. G.CollinsN. L. (2006). Optimizing assurance: The risk regulation system in relationships. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 641–666.
42.
MurrayS. L.LamarcheV.SeeryM. D.JungH. Y.GriffinD. W.BrinkmanC. (2021). The social-safety system: Fortifying relationships in the face of the unforeseeable. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 120, 99–130.
43.
MurrayS. L.McNultyJ.XiaJ.LamarcheV.SeeryM. D.WardD.GriffinD. W.HicksL.JungH. Y. (2023). Pursuing safety in social connection regulates the risk-regulation, social-safety, and behavioral-immune systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 125, 519–547.
44.
MurrayS. L.PascuzziG. S. (2024). Pursuing safety in social connection: A flexibly fluid perspective on risk regulation in relationships. Annual Review of Psychology, 75, 379–404.
45.
NezlekJ. B.KowalskiR. M.LearyM. R.BlevinsT.HolgateS. (1997). Personality moderators of reactions to interpersonal rejection: Depression and trait self-esteem. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(12), 1235–1244.
46.
ParavatiE.NaiduE.GabrielS. (2021). From “love actually” to love, actually: The sociometer takes every kind of fuel. Self and Identity, 20, 6–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2020.1743750
47.
PrenticeD. A.MillerD. T. (1992). When small effects are impressive. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 160–164.
48.
ReevesB.NassC. (1996). The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. Cambridge University Press.
49.
RichmanL. S.LearyM. R. (2009). Reactions to discrimination, stigmatization, ostracism, and other forms of interpersonal rejection: A dynamic, multi-motive model. Psychological Review, 116, 365–383.
50.
RussellD.PeplauL. A.CutronaC. E. (1980). The revised UCLA Loneliness Scale: Concurrent and discriminant validity evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 472–480.
51.
SchiappaE.AllenM.GreggP. B. (2007). Parasocial relationships and television: A meta-analysis of the effects. In PreissR. (Ed.), Mass media effects: Advances through meta-analysis (pp. 301–314). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
52.
SchiappaE.GreggP. B.HewesD. E. (2005). The parasocial contact hypothesis. Communication Monographs, 72, 92–115.
53.
SchiappaE.GreggP. B.HewesD. E. (2006). Can one TV show make a difference? Will & Grace and the parasocial contact hypothesis. Journal of Homosexuality, 51, 15–37.
54.
SlavichG. M. (2020). Social safety theory: A biologically based evolutionary perspective on life stress, health, and behavior. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 16, 265–295.
55.
TwengeJ. M. (2005). When does social rejection lead to aggression? The influences of situations, narcissism, emotion, and replenishing connections. In WilliamsK. D.ForgasJ. P.von HippelW. (Eds.), The social outcast: Ostracism, social exclusion, rejection, and bullying (pp. 201–212). Psychology Press.
56.
UysalA.LinH. L.BushA. L. (2012). The reciprocal cycle of self-concealment and trust in romantic relationships. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 844–851.
57.
WilliamsK. D.CheungC. K. T.ChoiW. (2000). CyberOstracism: Effects of being ignored over the Internet. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 748–762.
58.
WilliamsK. D.SommerK. (1997). Social ostracism by coworkers: Does rejection lead to loafing or compensation?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 693–706.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
