Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

People’s beliefs about sexual minorities are intertwined with their beliefs about gender (i.e., the sexuality-as-gendered framework), leading to the prediction that the amount of friendly contact with sexual minorities will be related to one’s beliefs about gender. We test this prediction across two studies (total N = 860), to show that reported friendships with sexual minorities relate not only to beliefs about sexual minorities, but also to attitudes toward people who are gender atypical, beliefs about traditional gender roles and norms, and endorsement of different versions of sexism. Our findings indicate that the sexuality-as-gendered framework involves not only people’s cognitions in terms of beliefs and attitudes, but also the types of interpersonal relationships they maintain.

Keywords

gender roles sexuality/sexual orientation contact sexism conservatism

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams

K. A.

Nagoshi

C. T.

Filip-Crawford

Terrell

H. K.

Nagoshi

J. L.

(2016). Components of gender-nonconformity prejudice. International Journal of Transgenderism, 17(3–4), 185–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/15532739.2016.1200509

Allport

(1954). The nature of prejudice. Addison Wesley.

American National Election Studies. (2021). ANES 2020 time series study full release [dataset and documentation]. www.electionstudies.org

Bareket

Fiske

S. T.

(2023). A systematic review of the ambivalent sexism literature: Hostile sexism protects men’s power; benevolent sexism guards traditional gender roles. Psychological Bulletin, 149(11–12), 637–698. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000400

Barreto

Doyle

D. M.

(2023). Benevolent and hostile sexism in a shifting global context. Nature Reviews Psychology, 2, 98–111. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-022-00136-x

Bergh

Brandt

M. J.

(2022). Mapping principal dimensions of prejudice in the United States. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 123(1), 154–173. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000360

Bergh

Brandt

M. J.

(2023). Generalized Prejudice: Lessons about social power, ideological conflict, and levels of abstraction. European Review of Social Psychology, 34(1), 92–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2022.2040140

Bettinsoli

M. L.

Suppes

Napier

J. L.

(2020). Predictors of attitudes toward gay men and lesbian women in 23 countries. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(5), 697–708. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619887785

Blashill

A. J.

Powlishta

K. K.

(2012). Effects of gender-related domain violations and sexual orientation on perceptions of male and female targets: An analogue study. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41(5), 1293–1302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-012-9971-1

10.

Broesch

Crittenden

A. N.

Beheim

B. A.

Blackwell

A. D.

Bunce

J. A.

Colleran

Hagel

Kline

McElreath

Nelson

R. G.

Pisor

A. C.

Prall

Pretelli

Purzycki

Quinn

E. A.

Ross

Scelza

Starkweather

Stieglitz

Mulder

M. B.

(2020). Navigating cross-cultural research: Methodological and ethical considerations. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 287, 20201245. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2020.1245

11.

Brooten

B. J.

(1996). Love between women: Early Christian responses to female homoeroticism. University of Chicago Press.

12.

Brylka

Jasinskaja-Lahti

Mähönen

T. A.

(2016). The majority influence on interminority attitudes: The secondary transfer effect of positive and negative contact. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 50, 76–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2015.12.007

13.

Clarke

E. V.

Sibley

C. G.

Osborne

(2024). Hostile sexism predicts annual within-person increases in sexual prejudice for both men and women: Evidence from an 8-year RI-CLPM. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 49(1), 8–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843241275579

14.

Costa

P. A.

Almeida

Anselmo

Ferreira

Pereira

Leal

(2014). University students’ attitudes toward same-sex parenting and gay and lesbian rights in Portugal. Journal of Homosexuality, 61(12), 1667–1686. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2014.951253

15.

Crisp

R. J.

Turner

R. N.

(2009). Can imagined interactions produce positive perceptions? Reducing prejudice through simulated social contact. American Psychologist, 64(4), 231–240. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014718

16.

Cunningham

G. B.

Melton

E. N.

(2013). The moderating effects of contact with lesbian and gay friends on the relationships among religious fundamentalism, sexism, and sexual prejudice. Journal of Sex Research, 50, 401–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2011.648029

17.

Dhont

Van Hiel

De Bolle

Roets

(2012). Longitudinal intergroup contact effects on prejudice using self- and observer-reports. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51, 221–238. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02039.x

18.

Faul

Erdfelder

Buchner

Lang

A.-G.

(2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149

19.

Glick

Fiske

S. T.

(1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491

20.

Glick

Fiske

S. T.

(2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56(2), 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.2.109

21.

Gosling

S. D.

Rentfrow

P. J.

Swann

W. B.

Jr (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(6), 504–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00046-1

22.

Graham

H. E.

Frame

M. C.

Kenworthy

J. B.

(2014). The moderating effect of prior attitudes on intergroup face-to-face contact. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 44, 547–556. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12246

23.

Haerpfer

Inglehart

Moreno

Welzel

Kizilova

Diez-Medrano

Lagos

Norris

Ponarin

Puranen

(Eds.). (2022). World Values Survey: Round seven—country-pooled datafile version 5.0. JD Systems Institute & WVSA Secretariat. https://doi.org/10.14281/18241.24

24.

Harwood

Paolini

Joyce

Rubin

Arroyo

(2011). Secondary transfer effects from imagined contact: Group similarity affects the generalization gradient. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50, 180–189. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466610X524263

25.

Heinrich

(2020). The WEIRDest people in the world: How the West became psychologically peculiar and particularly prosperous. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

26.

Henry

P. J.

(2024). Nonverbal gender cues as accurate signals of sexual orientation. Sex Roles, 90, 1483–1505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-024-01527-5

27.

Henry

P. J.

Steiger

R. L.

(2022). Sexual orientation as gendered to the everyday perceiver. Sex Roles, 87(3–4), 117–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-022-01313-1

28.

Herek

G. M.

(1988). Heterosexuals’ attitudes toward lesbians and gay men: Correlates and gender differences. The Journal of Sex Research, 25(4), 451–477. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224498809551476

29.

Herek

G. M.

Capitanio

J. P.

(1996). “Some of my best friends”: Intergroup contact, concealable stigma, and heterosexuals’ attitudes toward gay men and lesbians. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 412–424. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672962240

30.

Herek

G. M.

McLemore

K. A.

(2013). Sexual prejudice. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 309–333. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143826

31.

Hewstone

Judd

C. M.

Sharp

(2011). Do observer ratings validate self-reports of intergroup contact? A round-robin analysis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(3), 599–609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.12.014

32.

Hodson

Crisp

R. J.

Meleady

Earle

(2018). Intergroup contact as an agent of cognitive liberalization. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(5), 523–548. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617752324

33.

Hodson

Harry

Mitchell

(2009). Independent benefits of contact and friendship on attitudes toward homosexuals among authoritarians and highly identified heterosexuals. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 509–525. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.558

34.

Hoffarth

M. R.

Hodson

(2020). Coming out, intergroup relations, and attitudes toward LGBT rights. The Oxford Encyclopedia of LGBTQ Politics and Policy. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.1179

35.

Hyde

J. S.

Bigler

R. S.

Joel

Tate

C. C.

van Anders

S. M.

(2019). The future of sex and gender in psychology: Five challenges to the gender binary. American Psychologist, 74(2), 171–193. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000307

36.

Kerns

J. G.

Fine

M. A.

(1994). The relations between gender and negative attitude toward gay men and lesbians: Do gender role attitudes mediate this relation? Sex Roles, 31, 297–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01544590

37.

Kite

M. E.

(1994). When perceptions meet reality: Individual differences in reactions to lesbians and gay men. In Greene

Herek

G. M.

(Eds.), Lesbian and gay psychology: Theory, research, and clinical applications (pp. 25–53). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483326757.n2

38.

Kite

M. E.

Deaux

(1987). Gender belief systems: Homosexuality and the implicit inversion theory. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11(1), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1987.tb00776.x

39.

Kwon

Hugelshofer

D. S.

(2012). Lesbian, gay, and bisexual speaker panels lead to attitude change among heterosexual college students. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services, 24(1), 62–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/10538720.2012.643285

40.

Levant

R. F.

Hall

R. J.

Rankin

T. J.

(2013). Male Role Norms Inventory–Short Form (MRNI-SF): Development, confirmatory factor analytic investigation of structure, and measurement invariance across gender. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 60(2), 228–238. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031545

41.

Loehr

Doan

Miller

L. R.

(2015). The role of selection effects in the contact hypothesis: Results from a US national survey on sexual prejudice. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44, 2111–2123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-015-0483-7

42.

Lolliot

Schmid

Hewstone

Al Ramiah

Tausch

Swart

(2013). Generalized effects of intergroup contact: The secondary transfer effect. In Hodson

Hewstone

(Eds.), Advances in intergroup relations (pp. 81–112). Psychology Press. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2012-28154-004

43.

Mahalik

J. R.

Morray

E. B.

Coonerty-Femiano

Ludlow

L. H.

Slattery

S. M.

Smiler

(2005). Development of the Conformity to Feminine Norms Inventory. Sex Roles, 52, 417–435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-3709-7

44.

Massad

(2002). Re-orienting desire: The Gay International and the Arab world. Public Culture, 14(2), 361–385. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/26284

45.

McMillan

Craig

la Roi

Veenstra

(2023). Adolescent friendship, cross-sexuality ties, and attitudes toward sexual minorities: A social network approach to intergroup contact. Social Science Research, 114, 102916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2023.102916

46.

Meleady

Crisp

R. J.

Hodson

Earle

(2019). On the generalization of intergroup contact: A taxonomy of transfer effects. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(5), 430–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721419848682

47.

Mikołajczak

Fisher

A. N.

Ryan

M. K.

(2025). Intergroup contact in the context of gender. A critical review of the literature and opportunities for future research. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 28(4), 723–751. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302241311544

48.

Morrison

M. A.

Morrison

T. G.

(2002). Development and validation of a scale measuring modern prejudice toward gay men and lesbian women. Journal of Homosexuality, 43(2), 15–37. https://doi.org/10.1300/J082v43n02_02

49.

Murray

S. O.

(1995). Latin American male homosexualities. https://www.amazon.com/Latin-American-Homosexualities-Stephen-Murray/dp/0826316581

50.

Murray

S. O.

Pilling

A. R.

(1992). Oceanic homosexualities. Garland Pub.

51.

Murray

S. O.

Roscoe

(Eds.). (1998). Boy-wives and female husbands: Studies in African homosexualities. SUNY Press.

52.

NORC. (2022). General Social Survey, 1972–2022 cumulative file [Data set]. https://gss.norc.org/get-the-data

53.

Nussbaum

M. C.

(1999). Sex and social justice. Oxford University Press.

54.

Pettigrew

T. F.

(1997). Generalized intergroup contact effects on prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(2), 173–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167297232006

55.

Pettigrew

T. F.

(2009). Secondary transfer effect of contact: Do intergroup contact effects spread to noncontacted outgroups? Social Psychology, 40, 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335.40.2.55

56.

Pettigrew

T. F.

Tropp

L. R.

(2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751–783. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751

57.

Pistella

Tanzilli

Ioverno

Lingiardi

Baiocco

(2018). Sexism and attitudes toward same-sex parenting in a sample of heterosexuals and sexual minorities: The mediation effect of sexual stigma. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 15, 139–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-017-0284-y

58.

Reimer

N. K.

Becker

J. C.

Benz

Christ

Dhont

Klocke

Neji

Rychlowska

Schmid

Hewstone

(2017). Intergroup contact and social change: Implications of negative and positive contact for collective action in advantaged and disadvantaged groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(1), 121–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216676478

59.

Richardson

(2007). Patterned fluidities: (Re)imagining the relationship between gender and sexuality. Sociology, 41(3), 457–474. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038507076617

60.

Rodrigues

D. L.

(2024). Conformed to gender conformity? Gender nonconformity stigma is buffered by personal contact. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 42(2), 392–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075241298311

61.

Rollè

Sechi

Santoniccolo

Trombetta

Brustia

(2021). The relationship between sexism, affective states, and attitudes toward homosexuality in a sample of heterosexual Italian people. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-021-00534-5

62.

Roscoe

Murray

S. O.

(Eds.) (1997). Islamic homosexualities: Culture, history, and literature. NYU Press.

63.

Rosentiel

(2007). Four-in-ten Americans have close friends or relatives who are gay. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/2007/05/22/fourinten-americans-have-close-friends-or-relatives-who-are-gay/?utm_source=chatgpt.com

64.

Rubin

(1984). Thinking sex: Notes for a radical theory of the politics of sexuality. In Vance

C. S.

(Ed.), Pleasure and danger: Exploring female sexuality (pp. 267–319). Routledge. https://bpb-us-e2.wpmucdn.com/sites.middlebury.edu/dist/2/3378/files/2015/01/Rubin-Thinking-Sex.pdf

65.

Salvati

Piumatti

Giacomantonio

Baiocco

(2019). Gender stereotypes and contact with gay men and lesbians: The mediational role of sexism and homonegativity. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 29(6), 461–473. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2412

66.

Saucier

(2000). Isms and the structure of social attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(2), 366–385. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.2.366

67.

Sears

D. O.

(1986). College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology’s view of human nature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(3), 515–530. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.3.515

68.

Sedgwick

E. K.

(1990). Epistemology of the closet. University of California Press. https://www.fulcrum.org/epubs/0k225d69x?locale=en#page=5

69.

Sidanius

Levin

van Laar

Sinclair

(2008). The diversity challenge: Social identity and intergroup relations on the college campus. Russell Sage Foundation. https://www.russellsage.org/publications/book/diversity-challenge

70.

Siebert

D. C.

Chonody

Siebert

C. F.

Rutledge

S. E.

(2014). The importance of confirmatory validation: Short version of the Attitudes Toward Lesbians and Gay Men Scale. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research, 5(2), 189–210.

71.

Simmons

J. L.

(1965). Public stereotypes of deviants. Social Problems, 13(2), 223–232. https://doi.org/10.2307/798906

72.

Smith

S. J.

Axelton

A. M.

Saucier

D. A.

(2009). The effects of contact on sexual prejudice: A meta-analysis. Sex Roles, 61, 178–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-009-9627-3

73.

Tausch

Hewstone

Kenworthy

J. B.

Psaltis

Schmid

Popan

J. R.

Cairns

Hughes

(2010). Secondary transfer effects of intergroup contact: Alternative accounts and underlying processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(2), 282–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018553

74.

van Anders

S. M.

(2015). Beyond sexual orientation: Integrating gender/sex and diverse sexualities via sexual configurations theory. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44, 1177–1213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-015-0490-8

75.

van Laar

Levin

Sinclair

Sidanius

(2005). The effect of university roommate contact on ethnic attitudes and behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 329–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2004.08.002

76.

Vezzali

Hewstone

Capozza

Giovannini

Wölfer

(2014). Improving intergroup relations with extended and vicarious forms of indirect contact. European Review of Social Psychology, 25, 314–389. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2014.982948

77.

Wellman

J. D.

McCoy

S. K.

(2014). Walking the straight and narrow: Examining the role of traditional gender norms in sexual prejudice. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 15(2), 181. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031943

78.

Westbrook

(2022). Trans categories and the sex/gender/sexuality system: How transforming understandings of sex and gender can shift sexuality. In Fischer

N. L.

Westbrook

Seidman

(Eds.), Introducing the new sexuality studies (4th ed.; pp. 25–34). Routledge.

79.

White

F. A.

Verrelli

Maunder

R. D.

Kervinen

(2019). Using electronic contact to reduce homonegative attitudes, emotions, and behavioral intentions among heterosexual women and men: A contemporary extension of the contact hypothesis. The Journal of Sex Research, 56, 1179–1191. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2018.1491943

80.

Whitley

B. E.

(2001). Gender-role variables and attitudes toward homosexuality. Sex Roles, 45(11), 691–721. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015640318045

81.

Yeck

A. T.

Anderson

V. N.

(2019). Homosexuality as haram: Relations among gender, contact, religiosity, and sexual prejudice in Muslim individuals. Sex Roles, 81, 192–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-0989-2

Evidence for the Sexuality-as-Gendered Framework From Interpersonal Contact

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References