There is robust evidence that gratitude encourages virtuous conduct. However, this research reveals that gratitude may also increase the likelihood of cheating for personal gain through a heightened tendency toward obedience. Across two studies, participants engaged in a performance-based task offering a monetary reward. Those induced to feel grateful toward the experimenter were more likely to obey a command to disregard their actual score and report an inflated score to secure the reward. The effect was not observed when the benefit arose from a positive chance event (Study 1) and appeared to be driven by the need to maintain social harmony (Study 2). The findings demonstrate that grateful individuals could be more susceptible to social influence—even to the extent of obeying morally dubious directives. These results call for a reevaluation of the link between gratitude and moral decision-making.
AlgoeS. B. (2012). Find, remind, and bind: The functions of gratitude in everyday relationships. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6, 455–469. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2012.00439.x
2.
AlgoeS. B.HaidtJ.GableS. L. (2008). Beyond reciprocity: Gratitude and relationships in everyday life. Emotion, 8, 425–429. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.8.3.425
3.
AndréQ. (2022). Outlier exclusion procedures must be blind to the researcher’s hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 151(1), 213–223. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001069
4.
AquinoK.FreemanD.ReedA.FelpsW.LimV. K. (2009). Testing a social-cognitive model of moral behavior: The interactive influence of situations and moral identity centrality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(1), 123–141. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015406
5.
AquinoK.ReedA. I. I. (2002). The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1423–1440. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.6.1423
BlakeK. R.GangestadS. (2020). On attenuated interactions, measurement error, and statistical power: Guidelines for social and personality psychologists. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46(12), 1702–1711. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167220913363
9.
BlassT. (1999). The Milgram Paradigm after 35 years: Some things we now know about obedience to authority. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29(5), 955–978. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1999.tb00134.x
10.
BlassT. (2012). A cross-cultural comparison of studies of obedience using the Milgram paradigm: A review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6(2), 196–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00417.x
11.
BocchiaroP.ZimbardoP. G.Van Lange PaulA. M. (2012). To defy or not to defy: An experimental study of the dynamics of disobedience and whistle-blowing. Social Influence, 7, 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/15534510.2011.648421
12.
BolgerN.AmarelD. (2007). Effects of social support visibility on adjustment to stress: Experimental evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(3), 458–475. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.3.458
13.
BriefA. P.ButtramR. T.ElliottJ. D.ReizensteinR. M.McClineR. L. (1995). Releasing the beast: A study of compliance with orders to use race as a selection criterion. Journal of Social Issues, 51, 177–193. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1995.tb01340.x
14.
BullockJ. G.GreenD. P.HaS. E. (2010). Yes, but what’s the mechanism? (don’t expect an easy answer). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(4), 550–558. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018933
15.
ChangY.-P.LinY.-C.ChenL. H. (2011). Pay it forward: Gratitude in social networks. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13(5), 761–781. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-011-9289-z
16.
CohnA.MaréchalM. A.NollT. (2015). Bad boys: How criminal identity salience affects rule violation. The Review of Economic Studies, 82(4), 1289–1308.
17.
DaiZ.GaleottiF.VillevalM. C. (2018). Cheating in the lab predicts fraud in the field: An experiment in public transportation. Management Science, 64(3), 1081–1100. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2616
18.
DeStenoD.BartlettM. Y.BaumannJ.WilliamsL. A.DickensL. (2010). Gratitude as moral sentiment: Emotion-guided cooperation in economic exchange. Emotion, 10(2), 289–293. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017883
19.
DeStenoD.DuongF.LimD.KatesS. (2019). The grateful don’t cheat: Gratitude as a fountain of virtue. Psychological Science, 30, 979–988. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619848351
20.
DeStenoD.LiY.DickensL.LernerJ. S. (2014). Gratitude: A tool for reducing economic impatience. Psychological Science, 25(6), 1262–1267. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614529979
21.
DuboisD.RuckerD. D.GalinskyA. D. (2015). Social class, power, and selfishness: When and why upper and lower class individuals behave unethically. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, 436–449. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000008
22.
FredricksonB. L. (2004). Gratitude, like other positive emotions, broadens and builds. In EmmonsR. A.McCulloughM. E. (Ed.), The psychology of gratitude (pp. 145–166). Oxford University Press.
23.
GeX. (2023). Experimentally manipulating mediating processes: Why and how to examine mediation using statistical moderation analyses. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 109, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2023.104507
24.
GordonA. M.ImpettE. A.KoganA.OveisC.KeltnerD. (2012). To have and to hold: Gratitude promotes relationship maintenance in intimate bonds. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(2), 257–274. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028723
25.
GrahamJ.NosekB. A.HaidtJ.IyerR.KolevaS.DittoP. H. (2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2), 366–385. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021847
26.
HannaR.WangS. Y. (2017). Dishonesty and selection into public service: Evidence from India. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 9(3), 262–290. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20150029
27.
HertzS. G.KrettenauerT. (2016). Does moral identity effectively predict moral behavior? A meta-analysis. Review of General Psychology, 20(2), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000062
JiaL.TongE. M. W.LeeL. N. (2014). Psychological “gel” to bind individuals’ goal pursuit: Gratitude facilitates goal contagion. Emotion, 14, 748–760. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036407
30.
KubackaK. E.FinkenauerC.RusbultC. E.KeijsersL. (2011). Maintaining close relationships: Gratitude as a motivator and a detector of maintenance behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(10), 1362–1375. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211412196
31.
LakensD.CaldwellA. R. (2021). Simulation-based power analysis for factorial analysis of variance designs. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4(1), Article 2515245920951503. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920951503
32.
LeysC.DelacreM.MoraY. L.LakensD.LeyC. (2019). How to classify, detect, and manage univariate and multivariate outliers, with emphasis on pre-registration. International Review of Social Psychology, 32(1), Article 5. https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.289
33.
LeysC.LeyC.KleinO.BernardP.LicataL. (2013). Detecting outliers: Do not use standard deviation around the mean, use absolute deviation around the median. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 764–766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.03.013
34.
MaL. K.TunneyR. J.FergusonE. (2017). Does gratitude enhance prosociality?: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 143, 601–635. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000103
35.
MartensA.KosloffS.GreenbergJ.LandauM. J.SchmaderT. (2007). Killing begets killing: Evidence from a bug-killing paradigm that initial killing fuels subsequent killing. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1251–1264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207303020
36.
McCulloughM. E.EmmonsR. A.TsangJ.-A. (2002). The grateful disposition: A conceptual and empirical topography. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(1), 112–127. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.1.112
MeeusW. H.RaaijmakersQ. A. (1986). Administrative obedience: Carrying out orders to use psychological-administrative violence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 16, 311–324. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420160402
39.
MilgramS. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 371–378. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040525
40.
MilgramS. (1974). Obedience to authority: An experimental view.
41.
MillerJ. (1991). Reaction time analysis with outlier exclusion: Bias varies with sample size. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43(4), 907–912. https://doi.org/10.1080/14640749108400962
42.
NgJ. W. X.TongE. M. W.SimD. L. Y.TeoS. W. Y.LoyX.GiesbrechtT. (2017). Gratitude facilitates private conformity: A test of the social alignment hypothesis. Emotion, 17(2), 379–387. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000249
43.
OlsenA. L.HjorthF.HarmonN.BarfortS. (2019). Behavioral dishonesty in the public sector. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 29(4), 572–590. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muy058
44.
PalmatierR.JarvisC.BechkoffJ.KardesF. (2009). The role of customer gratitude in relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 73(5), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.73.5.1
45.
PeruginiM.GallucciM.CostantiniG. (2018). A practical primer to power analysis for simple experimental designs. International Review of Social Psychology, 31(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.18
46.
PiffP. K.StancatoD. M.CôtéS.Mendoza-DentonR.KeltnerD. (2012). Higher social class predicts increased unethical behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109, 4086–4091. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1118373109
47.
PirlottA. G.MacKinnonD. P. (2016). Design approaches to experimental mediation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.012
48.
RivaP.WilliamsK. D.TorstrickA. M.MontaliL. (2014). Orders to shoot (a camera): Effects of ostracism on obedience. The Journal of Social Psychology, 154, 208–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2014.883354
49.
SasakiE.JiaL.LwaH. Y.GohM. T. (2020). Gratitude inhibits competitive behaviour in threatening interactions. Cognition and Emotion, 34(6), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2020.1724892
50.
SeptiantoF.GargN. (2021). Grateful compliance: Gratitude effects on willingness to comply with responsible drinking messages. Psychology & Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21535
SpencerS. J.ZannaM. P.FongG. T. (2005). Establishing a causal chain: Why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6), 845–851. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.845
53.
SteinelW.De DreuC. K. W. (2004). Social motives and strategic misrepresentation in social decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(3), 419–434. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.86.3.419
54.
SzcześniakM.RodzeńW.MalinowskaA.KroplewskiZ. (2020). Big Five personality traits and gratitude: The role of emotional intelligence. Psychology. Research and Behavior Management, 13, 977–988. https://doi.org/10.2147/prbm.s268643
55.
TongE. M. W.NgC.-X.HoJ. B. H.YapI. J. L.ChuaE. X. Y.NgJ. W. X.HoD. Z. Y.DienerE. (2021). Gratitude facilitates obedience: New evidence for the social alignment perspective. Emotion, 21(6), 1302–1316. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000928
56.
TongE. M. W.YangZ. (2011). Moral hypocrisy: Of proud and grateful people. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2, 159–165. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550610385711
57.
TrafimowD.TriandisH. C.GotoS. G. (1991). Some tests of the distinction between the private self and the collective self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(5), 649–655. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.5.649
Zeigler-HillV.SouthardA. C.ArcherL. M.DonohoeP. L. (2013). Neuroticism and negative affect influence the reluctance to engage in destructive obedience in the Milgram paradigm. The Journal of Social Psychology, 153(2), 161–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2012.713041
61.
ZhuR.XuZ.TangH.WangH.ZhangS.ZhangZ.MaiX.LiuC. (2020). The dark side of gratitude: Gratitude could lead to moral violation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 91, 104048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104048
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
