Interpreting Microaggressions: The Role of Discourse Context,Recipient Status,and Observers’ Political Orientation

Abstract

Microaggressions require an inferential process for their aggressive intent to be recognized. Using approaches from pragmatics, especially relevance theory, we conducted experiments to examine factors predicted to influence perceptions of an utterance as a microaggression. Participants read scenarios describing an interaction between two people and indicated their perceptions of a target remark. We expected and found that an utterance was more likely to be perceived as a microaggression if (a) it occurred in a context for which its relevance was not clear, thereby prompting observers to infer an aggressive intent, and (b) the recipient was a person of marginalized status. Furthermore, these effects were larger for participants with a more liberal political orientation relative to those who were more conservative. This was due, in part, to variability in Theory of Mind capabilities and beliefs about microaggressions associated with political orientation.

Keywords

microaggression experimental pragmatics language political psychology prejudice/stereotyping

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baron-Cohen

Wheelwright

Hill

Raste

Plumb

(2001). The “reading the mind in the eyes” test revised version: A study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42(2), 241–251.

Bleske-Rechek

Deaner

R. O.

Paulich

K. N.

Axelrod

Badenhorst

Nguyen

. . .Lay

P. S.

(2023). In the eye of the beholder: Situational and dispositional predictors of perceiving harm in others’ words. Personality and Individual Differences, 200, 111902.

Brown

Levinson

S. C.

(1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.

Corcoran

Frith

C. D.

(1996). Conversational conduct and the symptoms of schizophrenia. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 1, 305–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/135468096396460

Elder

C. H.

(2021). Microaggression or misunderstanding? Implicatures, inferences and accountability. Journal of Pragmatics, 179, 37–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.04.020

Faul

Erdfelder

Buchner

Lang

A. G.

(2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149

Freeman

Stewart

(2021). Toward a harm-based account of microaggressions. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(5), 1008–1023. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916211017099

Grice

H. P.

(1975). Logic and conversation. In Speech acts (pp. 41–58). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368811_003

Hayes

A. F.

(2018). An introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.

10.

Hewstone

(1990). The ‘ultimate attribution error’? A review of the literature on intergroup causal attribution. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20(4), 311–335.

11.

Holtgraves

(1999). Comprehending indirect replies: When and how are their conveyed meanings activated? Journal of Memory and Language, 41(4), 519–540. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1999.2657

12.

Holtgraves

(2023). Microaggressions in context: Linguistic and pragmatic perspectives. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 18(4), 733–737. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916221133824

13.

Holtgraves

Bray

(2023). US liberals and conservatives live in different (linguistic) worlds: Ideological differences when interpreting business conversations. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 53(7), 674–683. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12930

14.

Keysar

(1989). On the functional equivalence of literal and metaphorical interpretations in discourse. Journal of Memory and Language, 28(4), 375–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(89)90017-X

15.

King

L. A.

(Ed.). (2021). Microaggressions [Special Issue]. Perspectives in Psychological Science, 16(5).

16.

Levinson

S. C.

(2000). Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature (pp. xxiii, 480). The MIT Press.

17.

Lilienfeld

S. O.

(2017). Microaggressions: Strong claims, inadequate evidence. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(1), 138–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616659391

18.

Lilienfeld

S. O.

(2020). Microaggression research and application: Clarifications, corrections, and common ground. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(1), 27–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619867117

19.

Mazza

Di Michele

Pollice

Roncone

Casacchia

(2008). Pragmatic language and theory of mind deficits in people with schizophrenia and their relatives. Psychopathology, 41, 254–263. https://doi.org/10.1159/000128324

20.

Mekawi

Todd

N. R.

(2021). Focusing the lens to see more clearly: Overcoming definitional challenges and identifying new directions in racial microaggressions research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(5), 972–990. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691621995181

21.

Merriam-Webster. (n.d.). Microaggression. In Merriam-Webster.com dictionary. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/microaggression

22.

Microaggressions—Power, privilege, and everyday life. (n.d.). Microaggressions. https://www.microaggressions.com

23.

Pinker

Nowak

M. A.

Lee

J. J.

(2008). The logic of indirect speech. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(3), 833–838. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0707192105

24.

Searle

J. R.

(1979). Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511609213

25.

Spanierman

L. B.

Clark

D. A.

Kim

(2021). Reviewing racial microaggressions research: Documenting targets’ experiences, harmful sequelae, and resistance strategies. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(5), 1037–1059. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916211019944

26.

Sperber

Wilson

(1986). Relevance: Communication and cognition (Vol. 142). Harvard University Press.

27.

Sperber

Wilson

(2002). Pragmatics, modularity and mind-reading. Mind & Language, 17(1–2), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0017.00186

28.

Sterling

Jost

J. T.

Bonneau

(2020). Political psycholinguistics: A comprehensive analysis of the language habits of liberal and conservative social media users. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 118(4), 805–834. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000275

29.

Sue

D. W.

Spanierman

(2020). Microaggressions in everyday life. John Wiley & Sons.

30.

Watson

Clark

L. A.

(1984). Negative affectivity: The disposition to experience aversive emotional states. Psychological Bulletin, 96(3), 465–490. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.96.3.465

31.

Williams

M. T.

(2021). Racial microaggressions: Critical questions, state of the science, and new directions. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(5), 880–885. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916211039209

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.04 MB

0.09 MB

0.02 MB