Growing multiracial populations in the United States underscore the evolving complexity of racial identity, particularly in how racial perceptions shape perceived deservingness to resources. This research examines how individuals with Black/White and Native American/White ancestries are categorized and the influence of categorization on perceived deservingness of group-specific resources. It explores the persistence of hypodescent (assigning by non-dominant identity) and hyperdescent (assigning by dominant identity) relating to historical and policy contexts. Across two studies, participants categorized mixed-race targets and evaluated their deservingness for minority-specific resources (i.e., scholarship). Black/White targets were categorized as more Black, consistent with hypodescent bias, while Native/White targets were often categorized as more White, consistent with hyperdescent. Comparatively, these categorizations shaped perceptions of resource deservingness, especially for Black/White targets. This underscores the complexities of perceived multiracial group categorization and may suggest the need for nuanced understanding of racial identity in an increasingly diverse society.
AbascalM. (2020). Contraction as a response to group threat: Demographic decline and Whites’ classification of people who are ambiguously White. American Sociological Review, 85(2), 298–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122420905127
2.
BanksR. R.EberhardtJ. L. (1998). Social psychological processes and the legal bases of racial categorization. In EberhardtJ. L.FiskeS. T. (Eds.), Confronting racism: The problem and the response (pp. 54–75). Sage.
3.
BertholdD. (2010). Tidy Whiteness: A genealogy of race, purity, and hygiene. Ethics and the Environment, 15(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.2979/ete.2010.15.1.1
4.
CampbellM. E.HermanM. R. (2010). Politics and policies: Attitudes toward multiracial Americans. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 33(9), 1511–1536.
5.
CarlsonL. A. (1983). Federal policy and Indian land: Economic interests and the sale of Indian allotments, 1900-1934. Agricultural History, 57(1), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.11541.58083
6.
ChenJ. M. (2019). An integrative review of impression formation processes for multiracial individuals. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 13(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12430
7.
CooleyE.Brown-IannuzziJ. L.BrownC. S.PolikoffJ. (2018). Black groups accentuate hypodescent by activating threats to the racial hierarchy. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(4), 411–418. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617708014
8.
DavisF. J. (2010). Who is black? One nation’s definition. Penn State Press.
9.
DupreeC. H.BoykinC. M. (2021). Racial inequality in academia: Systemic origins, modern challenges, and policy recommendations. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8, 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732220984183
10.
ErhartR. S.HallD. L. (2019). A descriptive and comparative analysis of the content of stereotypes about Native Americans. Race and Social Problems, 11, 225–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12552-019-09264-1
11.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA.-G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
FrybergS. A.EasonA. E. (2017). Making the invisible visible: Acts of commission and omission. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(6), 554–559. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417720959
14.
GansH. J. (2012). “Whitening” and the changing American racial hierarchy. Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race, 9(2), 267–279. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1742058x12000288
15.
GarayM. M.PerryJ. M.RemediosJ. D. (2023). The maintenance of the US racial hierarchy through judgments of multiracial people based on proximity to whiteness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 49(6), 969–984.
16.
GarnerR.HancockB. H. (Eds.). (2014). Social theory: Continuity and confrontation: A reader (Vol. 1). University of Toronto Press.
17.
GoodJ. J.SanchezD. T.ChavezG. F. (2013). White ancestry in perceptions of Black/White biracial individuals: Implications for affirmative-action contexts. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43, E276–E286.
18.
GuessT. J. (2006). The social construction of Whiteness: Racism by intent, racism by consequence. Critical Sociology, 32(4), 649–673. https://doi.org/10.1163/156916306779155199
HayesA. F. (2022). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Press.
23.
HernándezT. K. (2018). Multiracials and civil rights: Mixed-race stories of discrimination. In Multiracials and civil rights. New York University Press.
24.
HickmanC. B. (1997). The devil and the one drop rule: Racial categories, African Americans, and the U.S. census. Michigan Law Review, 95(5), 1161–1265. https://doi.org/10.2307/1290008
25.
HoA. K.KteilyN. S.ChenJ. M. (2020). Introducing the sociopolitical motive× intergroup threat model to understand how monoracial perceivers’ sociopolitical motives influence their categorization of multiracial people. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 24(3), 260–286. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868320917051
26.
HoA. K.SidaniusJ.CuddyA. J.BanajiM. R. (2013). Status boundary enforcement and the categorization of Black–White biracial. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(5), 940–943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.04.010
27.
HoA. K.SidaniusJ.LevinD. T.BanajiM. R. (2011). Evidence for hypodescent and racial hierarchy in the categorization and perception of biracial individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(3), 492. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021562
28.
HorsmanR. (1981). Race and manifest destiny: The origins of American racial Anglo-Saxonism. Harvard University Press.
29.
KahnK.HoA. K.SidaniusJ.PrattoF. (2009). The space between us and them: Perceptions of status differences. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 12(5), 591–604. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430209338716
30.
KielD. (2017). Bleeding out: Histories and legacies of “Indian blood.” In RattereeK.HillN. (Eds.), The Great Vanishing Act: Blood quantum and the future of native nations.
31.
KnowlesE. D.LoweryB. S.HoganC. M.ChowR. M. (2009). On the malleability of ideology: Motivated construals of color blindness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(4), 857.
32.
KroschA. R.AmodioD. M. (2014). Economic scarcity alters the perception of race. PNAS Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(25), 9079–9084. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1404448111
33.
LeeJ.BeanF. D. (2004). America’s changing color lines: Immigration, race/ethnicity, and multiracial identification. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 221–242. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.30.012703.110519
34.
LitmanL.RobinsonJ.AbberbockT. (2017). TurkPrime.com: A versatile crowdsourcing data acquisition platform for the behavioral sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 49, 433–442. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0727-z
35.
MaillardK. N. (2006). The Pocahontas exception: American Indians and exceptionalism in Virginia’s Racial Integrity Act of 1924. Bepress Legal Series, 12, 1187. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.871096
36.
McKayD. L. (2021). Real Indians: Policing or protecting authentic Indigenous identity?Sociology of Race and Ethnicity, 7(1), 12–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332649218821450
PaukerK.MeyersC.SanchezD. T.GaitherS. E.YoungD. M. (2018). A review of multiracial malleability: Identity, categorization, and shifting racial attitudes. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 12(6), e12392.
41.
SalterP. S.AdamsG.PerezM. J. (2018). Racism in the structure of everyday worlds: A cultural-psychological perspective. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(3), 150–155.
42.
SanchezD. T.GoodJ. J.ChavezG. (2011). Blood quantum and perceptions of Black-White biracial targets: The Black ancestry prototype model of affirmative action. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167210389473
43.
ShihM.SanchezD. T. (2005). Perspectives and research on the positive and negative implications of having multiple racial identities. Psychological Bulletin, 131(4), 569–591. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.131.4.569.
44.
SidaniusJ.PrattoF. (1999). Social Dominance: An Intergroup Theory of Social Hierarchy and Oppression. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.20242.53440
45.
SongM. (2004). Introduction: Who’s at the bottom? Examining claims about racial hierarchy. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 27(6), 859–877. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141987042000268503
46.
StephanW. G.BonieckiK. A.YbarraO.BettencourtA.ErvinK. S.JacksonL. A.McNattP. S.RenfroC. L. (2002). The role of threats in the racial attitudes of Blacks and Whites. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(9), 1242–1254. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672022812009
47.
SweetF. W. (2005). Legal history of the color line: The rise and triumph of the one-drop rule.
ThorntonM. C. (2009). Policing the borderlands: White-and Black-American newspaper perceptions of multiracial heritage and the idea of race, 1996–2006. Journal of Social Issues, 65(1), 105–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2008.01590.x
WilliamsK. W. (2006). Mark one or more. University of Michigan Press.
52.
WilsonT. P. (1992). Blood quantum: Native American mixed bloods. Sage.
53.
WolfeP. (2001). Land, labor, and difference: Elementary structures of race. The American Historical Review, 106(3), 866–905. https://doi.org/10.1086/ahr/106.3.866
YoungD. M.SanchezD. T.PaukerK.GaitherS. E. (2021). A meta-analytic review of hypodescent patterns in categorizing multiracial and racially ambiguous targets. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 47(5), 705–727. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167220941321
56.
ZouL. X.CheryanS. (2017). Two axes of subordination: A new model of racial position. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112(5), 696. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000080
