Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Social hierarchies ultimately concern resource possession, yet psychological processes for regulating resource-related tensions remain underexplored. We examine how support for intergroup equality (egalitarianism) relates to explicit attitudes toward, and mental images of, the resource poor. In Study 1 (N = 625), egalitarians report more favorable attitudes toward the resource poor than anti-egalitarians. However, using the reverse correlation paradigm, both groups generate similarly negative mental images of this group, as shown by pixel luminance comparisons (Study 1) and evaluated by independent raters of person-perceptual (Study 2, N = 394) and coalitional traits (Study 3, N = 348). While ideology did not shape image generation, it did influence image evaluation: egalitarian raters showed less polarization between resource-poor and resource-rich faces than anti-egalitarian raters. These findings suggest that despite ideological differences in explicit attitudes (divergence), egalitarians, and anti-egalitarians share similarly negative mental representations (convergence) of the resource poor, highlighting a nuanced interplay between social perception and hierarchy regulation.

Keywords

resource possession mental representations social dominance hierarchy regulation reverse correlation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Archer

(1988). The behavioral biology of aggression. Cambridge Studies in Behavioral Biology.

Axt

Siemers

Discepola

M.-N.

Martinez

Xiao

Wehrli

(2023). The mind’s “aye”? Investigating overlap in findings produced by reverse correlation versus self-report. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 107, 104473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2023.104473

Barr

D. J.

Levy

Scheepers

Tily

H. J.

(2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001

Bjornsdottir

R. T.

Connor

Rule

N. O.

(2024). Social judgments from faces and bodies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 127, 455–468. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000397

Bjornsdottir

R. T.

Rule

N. O.

(2017). The visibility of social class from facial cues. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(4), 530–546. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000091

Brinkman

Goffin

Van De Schoot

Van Haren

N. E. M.

Dotsch

Aarts

(2019). Quantifying the informational value of classification images. Behavior Research Methods, 51(5), 2059–2073. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01232-2

Brinkman

Todorov

Dotsch

(2017). Visualising mental representations: A primer on noise-based reverse correlation in social psychology. European Review of Social Psychology, 28(1), 333–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2017.1381469

Browman

A. S.

Miele

D. B.

(2024). Are low-ability students mentally represented as low-SES, academically incapable, and undeserving of support? Journal of Social Issues, 80(4), 1289–1314. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12649

Brown-Iannuzzi

J. L.

Cooley

Cipolli

Payne

B. K.

(2023). Who gets to vote? Racialized mental images of legitimate and illegitimate voters. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 14(3), 356–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506211039408

10.

Brown-Iannuzzi

J. L.

Dotsch

Cooley

Payne

B. K.

(2017). The relationship between mental representations of welfare recipients and attitudes toward welfare. Psychological Science, 28(1), 92–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616674999

11.

Cone

Brown-Iannuzzi

J. L.

Lei

Dotsch

(2021). Type I error is inflated in the two-phase reverse correlation procedure. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 12(5), 760–768. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550620938616

12.

Cottrell

C. A.

Neuberg

S. L.

(2005). Different emotional reactions to different groups: A sociofunctional threat-based approach to “prejudice.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(5), 770–789. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.5.770

13.

Devine

P. G.

(1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 5–18.

14.

Devine

P. G.

Sharp

L. B.

(2009). Automaticity and control in stereotyping and prejudice. In Nelson

T. D.

(Ed.), Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination (pp. 61–87). Psychology Press.

15.

Dotsch

(2016). rcicr: Reverse correlation image classification toolbox (Version R Package Version 0.3.4.1) [Computer software]. https://www.rdocumentation.org/packages/rcicr/versions/0.3.4.1/topics/rcicr-package

16.

Dotsch

Todorov

(2012). Reverse correlating social face perception. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(5), 562–571. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611430272

17.

Eason

A. E.

Enright

E. A.

Weng

Horton

R. O.

Sitch

M. J.

Sommerville

J. A.

(2024). The haves and have-nots: Infants use wealth to guide social behavior and evaluation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 153(9), 2239–2257. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001567

18.

Fan

Tybur

J. M.

Jones

B. C.

(2022). Are people more averse to microbe-sharing contact with ethnic outgroup members? A registered report. Evolution and Human Behavior, 43(6), 490–500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2022.08.007

19.

Faul

Erdfelder

Buchner

Lang

A.-G.

(2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149

20.

Fessler

D. M. T.

Holbrook

Snyder

J. K.

(2012). Weapons make the man (larger): Formidability is represented as size and strength in humans. PLOS ONE, 7(4), e32751. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0032751

21.

Green

MacLeod

(2016). simr: An R package for power analysis of generalised linear mixed models by simulation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 7(4), 493–398. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12504

22.

Gundersen

A. B.

Kunst

J. R.

(2019). Feminist ≠ Feminine? Feminist women are visually masculinized whereas feminist men are feminized. Sex Roles, 80(5–6), 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-0931-7

23.

Hehman

Flake

J. K.

Calanchini

(2018). Disproportionate use of ethal Force in Policing is associated with regional racial biases of residents. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(4), 393–401. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617711229

24.

A. K.

Sidanius

Levin

D. T.

Banaji

M. R.

(2011). Evidence for hypodescent and racial hierarchy in the categorization and perception of biracial individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(3), 492–506. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021562

25.

A. K.

Sidanius

Kteily

Sheehy-Skeffington

Pratto

Henkel

K. E.

Foels

Stewart

A. L.

(2015). The nature of social dominance orientation: Theorizing and measuring preferences for intergroup inequality using the new SDO7 scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(6), 1003–1028.

26.

Hudson

S. T. J.

Myer

Berney

E. C.

(2024). Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination at the intersection of race and gender: An intersectional theory primer. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 18(2), e12939. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12939

27.

Iyengar

Lelkes

Levendusky

Malhotra

Westwood

S. J.

(2019). The origins and consequences of affective polarization in the United States. Annual Review of Political Science, 22(1), 129–146. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051117-073034

28.

Jackson

J. C.

Hester

Gray

(2018). The faces of God in America: Revealing religious diversity across people and politics. PLOS ONE, 13(6), e0198745. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198745

29.

Kteily

N. S.

Sheehy-Skeffington

A. K.

(2017)). Hierarchy in the eye of the beholder: (Anti-egalitarianism shapes perceived levels of social inequality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112(1), 136–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000097

30.

Kunst

J. R.

Kteily

Thomsen

(2019). “You little creep”: Evidence of blatant dehumanization of short groups. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10(2), 160–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617740613

31.

Leach

C. W.

van Zomeren

Zebel

Vliek

M. L. W.

Pennekamp

S. F.

Doosje

Ouwerkerk

J. W.

Spears

(2008)). Group-level self-definition and self-investment: A hierarchical (multicomponent model of in-group identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(1), 144–165. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.144

32.

Lei

R. F.

Bodenhausen

G. V.

(2017). Racial assumptions color the mental representation of social class. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00519

33.

Lundqvist

Litton

(1998). The Averaged Karolinska Directed Emotional Faces—AKDEF [Dataset]. Karolinska Institute.

34.

Martinez

J. E.

Todorov

(2024). Immigration documentation statuses evoke racialized faceism in mental representations. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 10673. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-61203-2

35.

Michalak

N. M.

Ackerman

J. M.

(2021). A multimethod approach to measuring mental representations of threatening others. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 150(1), 114–134. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000781

36.

Neuberg

S. L.

Kenrick

D. T.

Schaller

(2011). Human threat management systems: Self-protection and disease avoidance. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 35(4), 1042–1051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.08.011

37.

Neuberg

S. L.

Schaller

(2016). An evolutionary threat-management approach to prejudices. Current Opinion in Psychology, 7, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.06.004

38.

Neuberg

S. L.

Williams

K. E. G.

Sng

Pick

C. M.

Neel

Krems

J. A.

Pirlott

A. G.

(2020). Toward capturing the functional and nuanced nature of social stereotypes: An affordance management approach. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 62, 245–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.2020.04.004

39.

Petsko

C. D.

Kteily

N. S.

(2023)). Political (meta-dehumanization in mental representations: Divergent emphases in the minds of liberals versus conservatives. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672231180971

40.

Petsko

C. D.

Lei

R. F.

Kunst

Bruneau

Kteily

(2021). Blatant dehumanization in the mind’s eye: Prevalent even among those who explicitly reject it? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 150(6), 1115–1131.

41.

Roberts

S. O.

Weisman

Lane

J. D.

Williams

Camp

N. P.

Wang

Robison

Sanchez

Griffiths

(2020). God as a White man: A psychological barrier to conceptualizing Black people and women as leadership worthy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 119(6), 1290–1315. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000233

42.

Schmitz

Rougier

Yzerbyt

(2024). Introducing the brief reverse correlation: An improved tool to assess visual representations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 54, 1446–1461. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.3100

43.

Sheehy-Skeffington

Covarrubias

R. G.

Croizet

Goudeau

(2024). Society in the classroom: Introduction to the special issue. Journal of Social Issues, 80(4), 1211–1217. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12659

44.

Sidanius

Cotterill

Sheehy-Skeffington

Kteily

Carvacho

(2016). Social dominance theory: Explorations in the psychology of oppression. In Sibley

C. G.

Barlow

F. K.

(Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of the psychology of prejudice (1st ed., pp. 149–187). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316161579.008

45.

Sidanius

Pratto

(1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge University Press.

46.

Sng

Williams

K. E. G.

Tsukamoto

Neuberg

S. L.

(2024). Ecology stereotypes exist across societies and override race and family structure stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000421

47.

Stangor

Lange

J. E.

(1994). Mental representations of social groups: Advances in understanding stereotypes and stereotyping. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 357–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60157-4

48.

Thomsen

(2020). The developmental origins of social hierarchy: How infants and young children mentally represent and respond to power and status. Current Opinion in Psychology, 33, 201–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.07.044

49.

Thomsen

Frankenhuis

W. E.

Ingold-Smith

Carey

(2011). Big and mighty: Preverbal infants mentally represent social dominance. Science, 331(6016), 477–480. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1199198

50.

Van Leeuwen

Petersen

M. B.

(2018). The behavioral immune system is designed to avoid infected individuals, not outgroups. Evolution and Human Behavior, 39(2), 226–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2017.12.003

51.

Waldfogel

H. B.

Sheehy-Skeffington

Hauser

O. P.

A. K.

Kteily

N. S.

(2021). Ideology selectively shapes attention to inequality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(14), e2023985118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2023985118

52.

Williams

K. E. G.

(2023). Stereotypes of criminality in the U.S. track ecology, not race. Evolution and Human Behavior, 44(3), 255–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2023.03.004

53.

Williams

K. E. G.

Sng

Neuberg

S. L.

(2016). Ecology-driven stereotypes override race stereotypes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(2), 310–315. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1519401113

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

1.45 MB

Resource Possession in the Mind’s Eye: Ideological Convergence and Divergence in the Perceptions of Poor People

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material