Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Theoretical models suggest that incidental emotions, which are unrelated to the task at hand or situation, could influence prosocial behaviors. However, inconsistent effects across studies highlight the need for a comprehensive quantitative synthesis. Results based on 219 effect sizes from 108 studies (total N = 15,355 participants) revealed: (a) a small but significant overall causal effect of positive emotions on prosocial behavior (after publication bias correction), while negative emotions showed more complex result patterns; (b) beyond valence-based approach, emotions with the same valence but different social functions had distinct effects on prosocial behaviors; and (c) discrete emotions within the same social function clusters, showed varying effects. Overall, these effects are appreciably different not only between clusters but also within clusters. Moderation analyses identified methodological factors explaining heterogeneity in previous findings. We discussed the theoretical and practical implications of these results.

Keywords

emotion prosocial behavior social functions of emotion multilevel meta-analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ajzen

Fishbein

(1977). Attitude-Behavior Relations: A Theoretical Analysis and Review of Empirical Research. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 888–918. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.84.5.888

Aknin

L. B.

Van de Vondervoort

J. W.

Hamlin

J. K.

(2018). Positive feelings reward and promote prosocial behavior. Current Opinion in Psychology, 20, 55–59. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.08.017

Alden

L. E.

Taylor

C. T.

(2004). Interpersonal processes in social phobia. Clinical Psychology Review, 24(7), 857–882. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2004.07.006

Amir-Behghadami

Janati

(2020). Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes and Study (PICOS) design as a framework to formulate eligibility criteria in systematic reviews. Emergency Medicine Journal, 37(6), 387. https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2020-209567

Andersson

P. A.

Vartanova

Västfjäll

Tinghög

Strimling

Hazin

Akotia

C. S.

Aldashev

Andrighetto

Anum

Arikan

Bagherian

Barrera

Basnight-Brown

Batkeyev

Berezina

Björnstjerna

. . . Eriksson

(2024). Anger and disgust shape judgments of social sanctions across cultures, especially in high individual autonomy societies. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 5591. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-55815-x

Angie

A. D.

Connelly

Waples

E. P.

Kligyte

(2011). The influence of discrete emotions on judgement and decision-making: A meta-analytic review. Cognition and Emotion, 25(8), 1393–1422. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2010.550751

Barsade

S. G.

(2002). The ripple effects: Emotional contagion and its influence on group behavior. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(4), 644–675. https://doi.org/10.2307/3094912

Basil

D. Z.

Ridgway

N. M.

Basil

M. D.

(2006). Guilt appeals: The mediating effect of responsibility. Psychology & Marketing, 23(12), 1035–1054. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20145

Batson

C. D.

Lishner

D. A.

Stocks

E. L.

(2015). The empathy—Altruism hypothesis. In Schroeder

D. A.

Graziano

W. G.

(Eds.), The Oxford handbook of prosocial behavior (pp. 259–281). Oxford University Press.

10.

Baumeister

R. F.

Leary

M. R.

(1995). The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497

11.

Bechara

Damasio

A. R.

Lee

G. P.

(1999). Different contributions of the human amygdala and ventromedial prefrontal cortex to decision-making. Journal of Neuroscience, 19(13), 5473–5481. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.19-13-05473.1999

12.

Berger

K. S.

(2003). The developing person through childhood and adolescence (6th ed.). Worth Publishers.

13.

Borenstein

Hedges

L. V.

Higgins

J. P. T.

Rothstein

H. R.

(2009). Meta-analysis methods based on direction and p-values. In Introduction to Meta-Analysis (pp. 325–330). John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

14.

Carlson

Charlin

Miller

(1988). Positive mood and helping behavior: A test of six hypotheses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(2), 211–229. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.55.2.211

15.

Cavanaugh

L. A.

Bettman

J. R.

Luce

M. F.

(2015). Feeling love and doing more for distant others: Specific positive emotions differentially affect prosocial consumption. Journal of Marketing Research, 52(5), 657–673. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.10.0219

16.

Cheung

M. W.

(2014). Modeling dependent effect sizes with three-level meta-analyses: A structural equation modeling approach. Psychological Methods, 19(2), 211–229. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032968

17.

Clary

E. G.

Snyder

Ridge

R. D.

Copeland

Stukas

A. A.

Haugen

Miene

(1998). Understanding and assessing the motivations of volunteers: A functional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1516–1530. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.74.6.1516

18.

Cowen

A. S.

Brooks

J. A.

Prasad

Tanaka

Kamitani

Kirilyuk

Somandepalli

Jou

Schroff

Adam

Sauter

Fang

Manokara

Tzirakis

Keltner

(2024). How emotion is experienced and expressed in multiple cultures: a large-scale experiment across North America, Europe, and Japan. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1350631. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1350631

19.

Damasio

A. R.

(1994). Descartes’ error and the future of human life. Scientific American, 271(4), 144. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican1094-144

20.

Daniel

(2018). esc: Effect Size Computation for Meta Analysis (Version 0.5.1). Zenodo.

21.

Davidson

R. J.

(1978). Specificity and patterning in biobehavioral systems: Implications for behavior change. American Psychologist, 33(5), 430–436. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.33.5.430

22.

Davis

Redshaw

Suddendorf

Nielsen

Kennedy-Costantini

Oostenbroek

Slaughter

(2021). Does neonatal imitation exist? Insights from a meta-analysis of 336 effect sizes. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(6), 1373–1397. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620959834

23.

de Bruin

Della Sala

. (2015). The decline effect: How initially strong results tend to decrease over time. Cortex, 73, 375–377. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2015.05.025

24.

de Hooge

I. E

. (2014). Predicting consumer behavior with two emotion appraisal dimensions: Emotion valence and agency in gift giving. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 31(4), 380–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2014.04.002

25.

de Hooge

I. E.

Zeelenberg

Breugelmans

S. M

. (2010). Restore and protect motivations following shame. Cognition and Emotion, 24(1), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930802584466

26.

Dukes

Abrams

Adolphs

Ahmed

M. E.

Beatty

Berridge

K. C.

Broomhall

Brosch

Campos

J. J.

Clay

Clément

Cunningham

W. A.

Damasio

D’Arms

Davidson

J. W.

de Gelder

Deonna

de Sousa

. . . Sander

(2021). The rise of affectivism. Nature Human Behaviour, 5(7), 816–820. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01130-8

27.

Dunn

J. R.

Schweitzer

M. E.

(2005). Feeling and believing: The influence of emotion on trust. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(5), 736–748. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.5.736

28.

Eisenberg

Miller

P. A.

(1987). The relation of empathy to prosocial and related behaviors. Psychological Bulletin, 101(1), 91–119. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.101.1.91

29.

Emmons

R. A.

McCullough

M. E.

(2003). Counting blessings versus burdens: An experimental investigation of gratitude and subjective well-being in daily life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(2), 377–389. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.2.377

30.

Faraji-Rad

Pham

M. T.

(2017). Uncertainty increases the reliance on affect in decisions. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucw073

31.

Fessler

D. M. T.

Clark

J. A.

Clint

E. K.

(2015). Evolutionary psychology and evolutionary anthropology. In Buss

D. M.

(Ed.), The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology (pp. 1–18). Wiley.

32.

Fischbacher

Gächter

Fehr

(2001). Are people conditionally cooperative? Evidence from a public goods experiment. Economics Letters, 71(3), 397–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1765(01)00394-9

33.

Forgas

J. P.

(1995). Mood and judgment: the affect infusion model (AIM). Psychological Bulletin, 117(1), 39–66. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.1.39

34.

Forgas

J. P.

(2001). The Affect Infusion Model (AIM): An integrative theory of mood effects on cognition and judgments. In Martin

L. L.

Clore

G. L.

(Eds.), Theories of mood and cognition: A user’s guidebook (pp. 99–134). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

35.

Forgas

J. P.

(2002). Affective Influences on Attitudes and Judgments. In Davidson

R. J.

Scherer

K. R.

Goldsmith

H. H.

(Eds.), Handbook of Affective Sciences. Oxford University Press.

36.

Fredrickson

B. L.

(1998). What good are positive emotions? Review of General Psychology, 2(3), 300–319. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.300

37.

Funder

D. C.

Ozer

D. J.

(2019). “Evaluating effect size in psychological research: Sense and nonsense”: Corrigendum. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(4), 509–509. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920979282

38.

Gomez

Zimmermann

P. G.

Guttormsen Schär

Danuser

(2009). Valence lasts longer than arousal. Journal of Psychophysiology, 23(1), 7–17. https://doi.org/10.1027/0269-8803.23.1.7

39.

Gummerum

López-Pérez

Van Dijk

Van Dillen

L. F.

(2022). Ire and punishment: Incidental anger and costly punishment in children, adolescents, and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 218, 105376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2022.105376

40.

Gummerum

Van Dillen

L. F.

Van Dijk

López-Pérez

(2016). Costly third-party interventions: The role of incidental anger and attention focus in punishment of the perpetrator and compensation of the victim. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 65, 94–104. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2016.04.004

41.

Harlé

K. M.

Sanfey

A. G.

(2007). Incidental sadness biases social economic decisions in the Ultimatum Game. Emotion, 7(4), 876–881. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.7.4.876

42.

Ibanez

Moureau

Roussel

(2017). How do incidental emotions impact pro-environmental behavior? Evidence from the dictator game. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 66, 150–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2016.04.003

43.

Inness

Desmarais

Day

(2005). Gender, mood state, and justice preference: Do mood states moderate gender-based norms of justice? British Journal of Social Psychology, 44(3), 463–478. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466604X17443

44.

Isen

A. M.

Levin

P. F.

(1972). Effect of feeling good on helping: Cookies and kindness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21(3), 384–388. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0032317

45.

Isen

A. M.

Simmonds

S. F.

(1978). The effect of feeling good on a helping task that is incompatible with good mood. Social Psychology, 41(4), 346–349. https://doi.org/10.2307/3033588

46.

Joseph

D. L.

Chan

M. Y.

Heintzelman

S. J.

Tay

Diener

Scotney

V. S.

(2020). The manipulation of affect: A meta-analysis of affect induction procedures. Psychological Bulletin, 146(4), 355–375. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000224

47.

Kaltwasser

Hildebrandt

Wilhelm

Sommer

(2017). On the relationship of emotional abilities and prosocial behavior. Evolution and Human Behavior, 38(3), 298–308. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2016.10.011

48.

Kassinove

Roth

Owens

S. G.

Fuller

J. R.

(2002). Effects of trait anger and anger expression style on competitive attack responses in a wartime prisoner’s dilemma game. Aggressive Behavior, 28(2), 117–125. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.90013

49.

Kossmeier

Tran

U. S.

Voracek

(2019). Visual inference for the funnel plot in meta-analysis. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 227(1), 83–89. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000358

50.

Kossmeier

Tran

U. S.

Voracek

(2020). Power-enhanced funnel plots for meta-analysis: The sunset funnel plot. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 228(1), 43–49. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000392

51.

Kurtz

Furnagiev

Forbes

(2023). A field study on the role of incidental emotions on charitable giving. Theory and Decision, 94(1), 167–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-022-09884-x

52.

Lerner

J. S.

Keltner

(2000). Beyond valence: Toward a model of emotion-specific influences on judgement and choice. Cognition and Emotion, 14(4), 473–493. https://doi.org/10.1080/026999300402763

53.

Lerner

J. S.

Valdesolo

Kassam

K. S.

(2015). Emotion and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 799–823. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115043

54.

López-López

J. A.

Van den Noortgate

Tanner-Smith

E. E.

Wilson

S. J.

Lipsey

M. W.

(2017). Assessing meta-regression methods for examining moderator relationships with dependent effect sizes: A Monte Carlo simulation. Research Synthesis Methods, 8(4), 435–450. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1245

55.

L. K.

Tunney

R. J.

Ferguson

(2017). Does gratitude enhance prosociality?: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 143(6), 601–635. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000103

56.

Marsh

A. A.

Kozak

M. N.

Ambady

(2007). Accurate identification of fear facial expressions predicts prosocial behavior. Emotion, 7(2), 239–251. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.7.2.239

57.

Matarazzo

Pizzini

Greco

Carpentieri

(2016, October 16–18). Effects of a chance task outcome on the offers in the ultimatum game: The mediation role of emotions. In 2016 7th IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Infocommunications (CogInfoCom). Wroclaw, Poland.

58.

Mellers

B. A.

Schwartz

Cooke

A. D. J.

(1998). Judgment and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 447–477. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.447

59.

Moeyaert

Ugille

Natasha Beretvas

Ferron

Bunuan

Van den Noortgate

(2017). Methods for dealing with multiple outcomes in meta-analysis: a comparison between averaging effect sizes, robust variance estimation and multilevel meta-analysis. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 20(6), 559–572. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2016.1252189

60.

Murray

Sujan

Hirt

Sujan

(1990). The influence of mood on categorization: A cognitive flexibility interpretation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 411–425. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.3.411

61.

Nakagawa

Lagisz

Jennions

M. D.

Koricheva

Noble

D. W. A.

Parker

T. H.

Sánchez-Tója

O’Dea

R. E.

(2022). Methods for testing publication bias in ecological and evolutionary meta-analyses. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 13(1), 4–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13724

62.

Neiss

(1988). Reconceptualizing arousal: Psychobiological states in motor performance. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 345–366. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.345

63.

Nosek

B. A.

Lakens

(2014). Registered reports: A method to increase the credibility of published results. Social Psychology, 45(3), 137–141. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000192

64.

Okada

E. M.

Hoch

S. J.

(2004). Spending time versus spending money. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(2), 313–323. https://doi.org/10.1086/422110

65.

Olivera-La Rosa

Corradi

Villacampa

Martí-Vilar

Arango

O. E.

Rosselló

. (2016). Effects of suboptimally presented erotic pictures on moral judgments: A cross-cultural comparison. PLoS One, 11(7), e0158690. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158690

66.

Page

M. J.

McKenzie

J. E.

Bossuyt

P. M.

Boutron

Hoffmann

T. C.

Mulrow

C. D.

Shamseer

Tetzlaff

J. M.

Akl

E. A.

Brennan

S. E.

Chou

Glanville

Grimshaw

J. M.

Hróbjartsson

Lalu

M. M.

Loder

E. W.

Mayo-Wilson

McDonald

. . . Moher

(2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

67.

Penner

L. A.

Dovidio

J. F.

Piliavin

J. A.

Schroeder

D. A.

(2005). Prosocial behavior: Multilevel perspectives. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 365–392. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070141

68.

Piff

Dietze

Feinberg

Stancato

Keltner

(2015). Awe, the small self, and prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, 883–899. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000018

69.

Prade

Saroglou

(2016). Awe’s effects on generosity and helping. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 11(5), 522–530. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2015.1127992

70.

Preston

J. L.

Shin

(2017). Spiritual experiences evoke awe through the small self in both religious and non-religious individuals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 70, 212–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2016.11.006

71.

R Core Team. (2022). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/

72.

Raposa

E. B.

Laws

H. B.

Ansell

E. B.

(2015). Prosocial behavior mitigates the negative effects of stress in everyday life. Clinical Psychological Science, 4(4), 691–698. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702615611073

73.

Roseman

I. J.

Wiest

Swartz

T. S.

(1994). Phenomenology, behaviors, and goals differentiate discrete emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(2), 206–221. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.2.206

74.

Rosenhan

D. L.

Salovey

Hargis

(1981). The joys of helping: Focus of attention mediates the impact of positive affect on altruism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40(5), 899–905. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.40.5.899

75.

Rubin

(2012). Inclusive Fitness, Reciprocal Altruism and Emotion: Testing a Social-functional Model of Anger and Gratitude Across Kin and Non-Kin Relationships (Publication Number 29239587) [PhD, The University of Western Ontario, Canada]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global, Ontario, CA, Canada. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1608&context=etd

76.

Rudd

Vohs

K. D.

Aaker

(2012). Awe expands people’s perception of time, alters decision making, and enhances well-being. Psychological Science, 23(10), 1130–1136. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612438731

77.

Scherer

K. R.

Wallbott

H. G.

(1994). Evidence for universality and cultural variation of differential emotion response patterning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(2), 310–328. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.66.2.310

78.

Schmidt

(2010). Detecting and correcting the lies that data tell. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(3), 233–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610369339

79.

Schmidt

F. L.

Hunter

J. E.

(2015). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications, Ltd.

80.

Schwarz

Clore

Schwarz

Clore

G. L.

Forgas

J. P.

Bechara

Damasio

A. R.

(1983). Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(3–4), 513–523. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.3.513

81.

Septianto

Sung

Seo

Tugiman

(2018). Proud volunteers: The role of self- and vicarious-pride in promoting volunteering. Marketing Letters, 29(4), 501–519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-018-9472-7

82.

Shaffer

D. R.

Graziano

W. G.

(1983). Effects of positive and negative moods on helping tasks having pleasant or unpleasant consequences. Motivation and Emotion, 7(3), 269–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00991677

83.

Shiota

M. N.

Papies

E. K.

Preston

S. D.

Sauter

D. A.

(2021). Positive affect and behavior change. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 39, 222–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2021.04.022

84.

Siegel

J. T.

Thomson

A. L.

Navarro

M. A.

(2014). Experimentally distinguishing elevation from gratitude: Oh, the morality. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 9(5), 414–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2014.910825

85.

Siniver

(2021). Do happy people cheat less? A field experiment on dishonesty. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 91, 101658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2020.101658

86.

Skandrani-Marzouki

Marzouki

Joule

R.-V.

(2012). Effects of subliminal affective priming on helping behavior using the foot-in-the-door technique. Psychological Reports, 111, 669–686. https://doi.org/10.2466/07.17.21.PR0.111.6.669-686

87.

Stanley

T. D.

Doucouliagos

(2014). Meta-regression approximations to reduce publication selection bias. Research Synthesis Methods, 5(1), 60–78. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1095

88.

Stellar

J. E.

Gordon

A. M.

Piff

P. K.

Cordaro

Anderson

C. L.

Bai

Maruskin

L. A.

Keltner

(2017). Self-transcendent emotions and their social functions: Compassion, gratitude, and awe bind us to others through prosociality. Emotion Review, 9(3), 200–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073916684557

89.

Storbeck

Clore

G. L.

(2008). Affective arousal as information: How affective arousal influences judgments, learning, and memory. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(5), 1824–1843. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00138.x

90.

Tangney

J. P.

Stuewig

Mashek

D. J.

(2007). Moral emotions and moral behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 345–372. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070145

91.

Tibi-Elhanany

Shamay-Tsoory

(2011). Social cognition in social anxiety: First evidence for increased empathic abilities. The Israel Journal of Psychiatry and Related Sciences, 48, 98–106.

92.

Tong

E. M. W.

(2015). Differentiation of 13 positive emotions by appraisals. Cognition and Emotion, 29(3), 484–503. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2014.922056

93.

Tsang

J.-A.

(2006). Gratitude and prosocial behaviour: An experimental test of gratitude. Cognition and Emotion, 20(1), 138–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930500172341

94.

van Kleef

Lelieveld

G.-J

. (2021). Moving the self and others to do good: The emotional underpinnings of prosocial behavior. Current Opinion in Psychology, 44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.08.029

95.

van Kleef

G. A.

De Dreu

C. K. W.

Manstead

A. S. R

. (2010). Chapter 2—An interpersonal approach to emotion in social decision making: The emotions as social information model. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 42, pp. 45–96). Academic Press.

96.

van Kleef

G. A.

Lelieveld

G.-J

. (2022). Moving the self and others to do good: The emotional underpinnings of prosocial behavior. Current Opinion in Psychology, 44, 80–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.08.029

97.

Viechtbauer

(2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor Package. Journal of Statistical Software, 36, 3. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v036.i03

98.

von Dawans

Fischbacher

Kirschbaum

Fehr

Heinrichs

. (2012). The social dimension of stress reactivity: Acute stress increases prosocial behavior in humans. Psychological Science, 23(6), 651–660. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611431576

99.

Webster

G. D.

Graber

J. A.

Gesselman

A. N.

Crosier

B. S.

Schember

T. O.

(2014). A life history theory of father absence and menarche: A meta-analysis. Evolutionary Psychology, 12(2), 273–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470491401200202

100.

Liu

(2023). Micro-foundations of strategic decision-making in family business organisations: A cognitive neuroscience perspective. Long Range Planning, 56(5), 102198. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2022.102198

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.82 MB

The Impact of Incidental Emotion on Prosocial Behavior: A Multilevel Meta-Analysis

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material