Three preregistered studies (N = 533) investigated the relationship between intellectual humility (IH) and cognitive and emotional empathy. Study 1 (n = 212) revealed a positive association between IH and empathic accuracy (EA), especially toward the outgroup. Study 2 (n = 112) replicated the significant association between IH and EA. Study 3 (n = 209) employed a manipulation to enhance IH to demonstrate causality. We found evidence for an indirect effect, wherein the manipulation increased state IH, which was associated with greater EA. A mini meta-analysis revealed that, on average, individuals with higher levels of IH exhibit increased EA, showing a greater understanding of others’ emotional states. Moreover, IH predicts empathic resilience—buffering against personal distress while maintaining or increasing empathic concern for others. These findings highlight the positive influence of IH on empathy, emphasizing its potential for fostering deeper connections and better understanding in social interactions.
AguinisH.PierceC. A.CulpepperS. A. (2009). Scale coarseness as a methodological artifact correcting correlation coefficients attenuated from using coarse scales. Organizational Research Methods, 12(4), 623–652. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428108318065
2.
BatsonC. D. (2009). These things called empathy: Eight related but distinct phenomena. In DecetyJ.IckesW. (Eds.), The social neuroscience of empathy (pp. 3 -15). Boston Review.
3.
BlankeE. S.RauersA.RiedigerM. (2016). Does being empathic pay off? Associations between performance-based measures of empathy and social adjustment in younger and older women. Emotion, 16(5), 671–683.
4.
BloomP. (2017a). Against empathy: The case for rational compassion. Random House.
5.
BloomP. (2017b). Empathy and its discontents. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(1), 24–31.
6.
BowesS. M.BlanchardM. C.CostelloT. H.AbramowitzA. I.LilienfeldS. O. (2020). Intellectual humility and between-party animus: Implications for affective polarization in two community samples. Journal of Research in Personality, 88, 103992.
7.
BowesS. M.CostelloT. H.LeeC.McElroy-HeltzelS.DavisD. E.LilienfeldS. O. (2022). Stepping outside the echo chamber: Is intellectual humility associated with less political myside bias?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 48, 150–164.
8.
BrienzaJ. P.KungF. Y.ChaoM. M. (2021). Wise reasoning, intergroup positivity, and attitude polarization across contexts. Nature Communications, 12(1), 1–11.
9.
BrislinR. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185–216.
10.
CameronC. D.HutchersonC. A.FergusonA. M.SchefferJ. A.HadjiandreouE.InzlichtM. (2019). Empathy is hard work: People choose to avoid empathy because of its cognitive costs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 148(6), 962.
11.
CrosbyL. (2001). The relation of maternal empathic accuracy to the development of self concept. Fielding Graduate Institute.
12.
DaoudN.GaoM.OsmanA.MuntanerC. (2018). Interpersonal and institutional ethnic discrimination, and mental health in a random sample of Palestinian minority men smokers in Israel. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 53, 1111–1122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-018-1531-0
13.
DavisM. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 113–126.
14.
DecetyJ. (2015). The neural pathways, development and functions of empathy. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 3, 1–6.
15.
DepowG. J.FrancisZ.InzlichtM. (2021). The experience of empathy in everyday life. Psychological Science, 32(8), 1198–1213.
16.
EyalT.SteffelM.EpleyN. (2018). Perspective mistaking: Accurately understanding the mind of another requires getting perspective, not taking perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 114(4), 547–571. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/pspa0000115
17.
FarooqR. (2022). Heywood cases: Possible causes and solutions. International Journal of Data Analysis Techniques and Strategies, 14(1), 79–88.
18.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA.-G.BuchnerA. (2007). G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193146
19.
FergusonA. M.CameronC. D.InzlichtM. (2020). Motivational effects on empathic choices. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 90, 104010.
20.
GleasonK. A.Jensen-CampbellL. A.IckesW. (2009). The role of empathic accuracy in adolescents’ peer relations and adjustment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(8), 997–1011.
21.
GolinoH.ShiD.ChristensenA. P.GarridoL. E.NietoM. D.SadanaR.… & Martinez-MolinaA. (2020). Investigating the performance of exploratory graph analysis and traditional techniques to identify the number of latent factors: A simulation and tutorial. Psychological Methods, 25(3), 292.
22.
GoslingS. D.RentfrowP. J.SwannW. B.Jr. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(6), 504–528.
23.
HassonY.Schori-EyalN.LandauD.HaslerB. S.LevyJ.FriedmanD.HalperinE. (2019). The enemy’s gaze: Immersive virtual environments enhance peace promoting attitudes and emotions in violent intergroup conflicts. PLOS ONE, 14(9), Article e0222342.
24.
HayesA. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Publications.
25.
HodgesS. D.KezerM. (2021). It is hard to read minds without words: Cues to use to achieve empathic accuracy. Journal of Intelligence, 9(2), 27.
26.
HookJ. N.FarrellJ. E.JohnsonK. A.Van TongerenD. R.DavisD. E.AtenJ. D. (2017). Intellectual humility and religious tolerance. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(1), 29–35.
27.
HughesJ.BeinerD.HughesM. J. (2022). Package “reghelper.”R Package Version, 1(1), 1-24.
28.
IckesW. J. (1997). Empathic accuracy. Guilford Press.
29.
IsraelashviliJ.PerryA. (2021). Nuancing perspective. Social Psychology, 52, 238–249.
30.
IsraelashviliJ.SauterD. A.FischerA. H. (2020). Different faces of empathy: Feelings of similarity disrupt recognition of negative emotions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 87, 103912.
31.
JordanM. R.AmirD.BloomP. (2016). Are empathy and concern psychologically distinct?Emotion, 16(8), 1107–1116.
32.
JospeK.GenzerS.Klein SelleN.OngD.ZakiJ.PerryA. (2020). The contribution of linguistic and visual cues to physiological synchrony and empathic accuracy. Cortex, 132, 296–308.
33.
JospeK.GenzerS.MansanoL.OngD.ZakiJ.SorokerN.PerryA. (2022). Impaired empathic accuracy following damage to the left hemisphere. Biological Psychology, 172, 108380.
34.
KassemN.RumY.PerryA. (2024). To feel and talk in a language of conflict: Distinct emotional experience and expression of bilinguals among disadvantaged minority members. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 45, 2992–3009.
35.
KesebirP. (2014). A quiet ego quiets death anxiety: Humility as an existential anxiety buffer. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106(4), 610–623. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035814
36.
KeysersC.GazzolaV. (2014). Dissociating the ability and propensity for empathy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(4), 163–166.
37.
KnöchelmannL.CohrsJ. C. (2025). Effects of intellectual humility in the context of affective polarization: Approaching and avoiding others in controversial political discussions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 129(1), 91–117. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000462
38.
KoetkeJ.SchumannK.PorterT.Smilo-MorganI. (2023). Fallibility salience increases intellectual humility: Implications for people’s willingness to investigate political misinformation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 49(5), 806–820.
39.
KrossE.GrossmannI. (2012). Boosting wisdom: Distance from the self enhances wise reasoning, attitudes, and behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(1), 43–48.
40.
Krumrei-MancusoE. J. (2017). Intellectual humility and prosocial values: Direct and mediated effects. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(1), 13–28.
41.
Krumrei-MancusoE. J. (2018). Humility in servant leadership among Christian student leaders: A longitudinal pilot study. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 46(4), 253–267.
42.
Krumrei-MancusoE. J.NewmanB. (2021). Sociopolitical intellectual humility as a predictor of political attitudes and behavioral intentions. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 9(1), 52–68.
43.
Krumrei-MancusoE. J.RouseS. V. (2016). The development and validation of the comprehensive intellectual humility scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 98(2), 209–221.
44.
LearyM. R.DiebelsK. J.DavissonE. K.Jongman-SerenoK. P.IsherwoodJ. C.RaimiK. T.DefflerS. A.HoyleR. H. (2017). Cognitive and interpersonal features of intellectual humility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(6), 793–813.
45.
LehmannM.KlugerA. N.Van TongerenD. R. (2023). Am I arrogant? Listen to me and we will both become more humble. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 18(3), 350–362.
46.
LevensonR. W.RuefA. M. (1992). Empathy: A physiological substrate. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(2), 234.
47.
Lewin-EpsteinN.SemyonovM. (2019). The Arab minority in Israel’s economy: Patterns of ethnic inequality. Routledge.
48.
LewisK. L.HodgesS. D.LaurentS. M.SrivastavaS.BiancarosaG. (2012). Reading between the minds: The use of stereotypes in empathic accuracy. Psychological Science, 23(9), 1040–1046.
49.
Ma-KellamsC.LernerJ. (2016). Trust your gut or think carefully? Examining whether an intuitive, versus a systematic, mode of thought produces greater empathic accuracy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(5), 674–685.
50.
MakowskiD.NajbergH.SimkoV.EpskampS. (2019). Package “psycho.”The Journal of Open Source Software, 3, 470. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.00470
51.
ManetaE.CohenS.SchulzM.WaldingerR. (2015). Linkages between childhood emotional abuse and marital satisfaction: The mediating role of empathic accuracy for hostile emotions. Child Abuse & Neglect, 44, 8–17.
52.
McElroyS. E.RiceK. G.DavisD. E.HookJ. N.HillP. C.WorthingtonE. L.Jr.Van TongerenD. R. (2014). Intellectual humility: Scale development and theoretical elaborations in the context of religious leadership. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 42(1), 19–30.
53.
McElroy-HeltzelS. E.BattalyH. (2023). Intellectual servility, structural influences, and multicultural perspectives: A response to Ballantyne. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 18(2), 224–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2022.2154699
54.
OwensB. P.JohnsonM. D.MitchellT. R. (2013). Expressed humility in organizations: Implications for performance, teams, and leadership. Organization Science, 24(5), 1517–1538. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1120.0795
55.
PalanS.SchitterC. (2018). Prolific.ac—A subject pool for online experiments. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 17, 22–27.
56.
PeetzJ.GrossmannI. (2021). Wise reasoning about the future is associated with adaptive interpersonal feelings after relational challenges. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 12(5), 629–637.
57.
PorterT.BaldwinC. R.WarrenM. T.MurrayE. D.Cotton BronkK.ForgeardM. J.SnowN. E.JayawickremeE. (2022). Clarifying the content of intellectual humility: A systematic review and integrative framework. Journal of Personality Assessment, 104, 573–585.
58.
PorterT.ElnakouriA.MeyersE. A.ShibayamaT.JayawickremeE.GrossmannI. (2022). Predictors and consequences of intellectual humility. Nature Reviews Psychology, 1(9), 524–536.
59.
PorterT.SchumannK. (2018). Intellectual humility and openness to the opposing view. Self and Identity, 17(2), 139–162.
60.
PorterT.SchumannK.SelmeczyD.TrzesniewskiK. (2020). Intellectual humility predicts mastery behaviors when learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 80, 101888.
61.
RaicheG.MagisD.RaicheM. G. (2020). Package “nFactors.”Repository CRAN, 2(3), 1–58.
62.
R Core Team. (2020). The R project for statistical computing.
63.
ReisH. T.LeeK. Y.O’KeefeS. D.ClarkM. S. (2018). Perceived partner responsiveness promotes intellectual humility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 79, 21–33.
64.
RiedigerM.BlankeE. S. (2020). Knowing what others think and feel: Empathic accuracy across adulthood. Annual Review of Developmental Psychology, 2, 157–176.
65.
RodriguezD.HookJ. N.FarrellJ. E.MosherD. K.ZhangH.Van TongerenD. R.DavisD. E.AtenJ. D.HillP. C. (2019). Religious intellectual humility, attitude change, and closeness following religious disagreement. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 14(2), 133–140.
66.
SamuelsonP. L.ChurchI. M. (2015). When cognition turns vicious: Heuristics and biases in light of virtue epistemology. Philosophical Psychology, 28(8), 1095–1113.
67.
ScarryE. (1996). The difficulty of imagining other people. In NussbaumM. C.CohenJ. (Eds.), For love of country: Debating the limits of patriotism (pp. 98–110). Beacon Press.
68.
Schmid MastM.IckesW. (2007). Empathic accuracy: Measurement and potential clinical applications. In FarrowT. F. D.WoodruffP. W. R. (Eds.), Empathy in mental illness (pp. 408–427). Cambridge University Press.
69.
SgambatiT. J.AydukO. N. (2023). Intellectual humility and political polarization: An exploration of social networks, attitudes, and affect. Political Psychology, 44, 807–828.
70.
TangneyJ. P. (2000). Humility: Theoretical perspectives, empirical findings and directions for future research. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 19(1), 70–82. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2000.19.1.70
71.
TingleyD.YamamotoT.HiroseK.KeeleL.ImaiK. (2014). Mediation: R package for causal mediation analysis. Journal of Statistical Software, 59(5), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v059.i05
72.
Van den NoortgateW.López-LópezJ. A.Marín-MartínezF.Sánchez-MecaJ. (2013). Three-level meta-analysis of dependent effect sizes. Behavior Research Methods, 45, 576–594.
73.
Van TongerenD. R.DavisD. E.HookJ. N.WitvlietC. V. (2019). Humility. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(5), 463–468.
74.
VerhofstadtL. L.BuysseA.IckesW.DavisM.DevoldreI. (2008). Support provision in marriage: The role of emotional similarity and empathic accuracy. Emotion, 8(6), 792.
75.
ViechtbauerW. (2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software, 36, 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v036.i03
76.
WeiszE.ZakiJ. (2018). Motivated empathy: A social neuroscience perspective. Current Opinion in Psychology, 24, 67–71.
77.
ZakiJ.BolgerN.OchsnerK. (2008). It takes two: The interpersonal nature of empathic accuracy. Psychological Science, 19(4), 399–404.
78.
ZakiJ.OchsnerK. (2011). Reintegrating the study of accuracy into social cognition research. Psychological Inquiry, 22(3), 159–182.
79.
ZakiJ.OchsnerK. N. (2012). The neuroscience of empathy: Progress, pitfalls and promise. Nature Neuroscience, 15(5), 675–680.
80.
ZakiJ.WeberJ.BolgerN.OchsnerK. (2009). The neural bases of empathic accuracy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(27), 11382–11387.
81.
ZhangH.FarrellJ. E.HookJ. N.DavisD. E.Van TongerenD. R.JohnsonK. A. (2015). Intellectual humility and forgiveness of religious conflict. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 43(4), 255–262.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
