Relational mobility is a socio-ecological factor that shapes our interpersonal behaviors. Across four studies involving three countries (N = 2,874), we tested the hypothesis that low relational mobility increases sensitivity to social rejection, which in turn fosters decision avoidance and difficulty in interpersonal situations (i.e., interpersonal indecision). Study 1 showed that countries with low relational mobility reported more subjective difficulties in interpersonal decision-making. Studies 2a and 2b demonstrated that cross-country differences in interpersonal indecision can be mediated by relational mobility and concerns about rejection. Study 3 further revealed that this mechanism is driven by heightened concerns and evaluations of negative relationship outcomes. Study 4 replicated the proposed mechanism using a scale that assesses the general tendency to experience interpersonal indecision. Our findings highlight the importance of socio-ecological context in shaping experiences when navigating interpersonal relationships.
AdlerN. E.EpelE. S.CastellazzoG.IckovicsJ. R. (2000). Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: Preliminary data in healthy, White women. Health Psychology, 19(6), 586–592. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.19.6.586
2.
AndersonC. J. (2003). The psychology of doing nothing: Forms of decision avoidance result from reason and emotion. Psychological Bulletin, 129(1), 139–167. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.1.139
3.
BerensonK. R.GyurakA.AydukÖ.DowneyG.GarnerM. J.MoggK.BradleyB. P.PineD. S. (2009). Rejection sensitivity and disruption of attention by social threat cues. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(6), 1064–1072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.07.007
4.
BoyceP.ParkerG. (1989). Development of a scale to measure interpersonal sensitivity. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 23(3), 341–351. https://doi.org/10.3109/00048678909068291
5.
CheekN. N.GoebelJ. (2020). What does it mean to maximize? “Decision difficulty,” indecisiveness, and the jingle-jangle fallacies in the measurement of maximizing. Judgment and Decision Making, 15(1), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1930297500006884
6.
ChenF. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(3), 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834
DowneyG.FeldmanS. I. (1996). Implications of rejection sensitivity for intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(6), 1327–1343. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.6.1327
9.
DowneyG.MougiosV.AydukO.LondonB. E.ShodaY. (2004). Rejection sensitivity and the defensive motivational system: Insights from the startle response to rejection cues. Psychological Science, 15(10), 668–673. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00738.x
10.
FalkC. F.HeineS. J.YukiM.TakemuraK. (2009). Why do Westerners self-enhance more than East Asians?European Journal of Personality, 23(3), 183–203. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.715
11.
GarrisC. P.OhbuchiK-iOikawaH.HarrisM. J. (2011). Consequences of interpersonal rejection: A cross-cultural experimental study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42(6), 1066–1083. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022110381428
12.
GermeijsV.De BoeckP. (2002). A measurement scale for indecisiveness and its relationship to career indecision and other types of indecision. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 18(2), 113–122. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.18.2.113
13.
GermeijsV.VerschuerenK. (2011). Indecisiveness and Big Five personality factors: Relationship and specificity. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(7), 1023–1028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.01.017
14.
GohJ. X.HallJ. A.RosenthalR. (2016). Mini meta-analysis of your own studies: Some arguments on why and a primer on how. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10(10), 535–549. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12267
15.
HallenbeckH. W.RodebaughT. L.ThompsonR. J. (2022). Understanding indecisiveness: Dimensionality of two self-report questionnaires and associations with depression and indecision. Psychological Assessment, 34(2), 176–187. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001072
16.
HamamuraT.MeijerZ.HeineS. J.KamayaK.HoriI. (2009). Approach-avoidance motivation and information processing: A cross-cultural analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(4), 454–462. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208329512
17.
HashimotoH.YamagishiT. (2013). Two faces of interdependence: Harmony seeking and rejection avoidance. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 16(2), 142–151. https://doi.org//10.1111/ajsp.12022
18.
HashimotoH.YamagishiT. (2016). Duality of independence and interdependence: An adaptationist perspective. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 19(4), 286–297. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12145
19.
HeineS. J.LehmanD. R.PengK.GreenholtzJ. (2002). What’s wrong with cross-cultural comparisons of subjective Likert scales? The reference-group effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 903–918. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.903
20.
HornseyM. J.GreenawayK. H.HarrisE. A.BainP. G. (2019). Exploring cultural differences in the extent to which people perceive and desire control. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(1), 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218780692
21.
HuangK.-J.TeohY.-S.ItohY. (2024). Victim impact statement and lay judges’ decision making: Exploring cross-cultural and individual differences in East Asia. Psychology, Crime & Law, 30, 1292–1312. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2023.2186408
22.
KitoM.YukiM.ThomsonR. (2017). Relational mobility and close relationships: A socioecological approach to explain cross-cultural differences. Personal Relationships, 24(1), 114–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12174
23.
KomiyaA.MiyamotoY.WatabeM.KusumiT. (2011). Cultural grounding of regret: Regret in self and interpersonal contexts. Cognition & Emotion, 25(6), 1121–1130. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2010.516962
24.
KomiyaA.OishiS.LeeM. (2016). The rural–urban difference in interpersonal regret. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(4), 513–525. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216636623
25.
LiL. M. W.AdamsG.KurtişT.HamamuraT. (2015). Beware of friends: The cultural psychology of relational mobility and cautious intimacy. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 18(2), 124–133. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12091
26.
LiL. M. W.HamamuraT.AdamsG. (2016). Relational mobility increases social (but not other) risk propensity. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 29(5), 481–488. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.1894
27.
LiL. M. W.MasudaT.JiangF. (2016). Influence of cultural meaning system and socioeconomic change on indecisiveness in three cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 47(4), 508–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.03.047
28.
LiL. M. W.MasudaT.RussellM. J. (2014). The influence of cultural lay beliefs: Dialecticism and indecisiveness in European Canadians and Hong Kong Chinese. Personality and Individual Differences, 68, 6–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.03.047
29.
LouN. M.LiL. M. W. (2017). Interpersonal relationship mindsets and rejection sensitivity across cultures: The role of relational mobility. Personality and Individual Differences, 108, 200–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.12.004
30.
LuanM.FuL.LiH. (2018). Do maximizers maximize for others? Self-other decision-making differences in maximizing and satisficing. Personality and Individual Differences, 121, 52–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.09.009
31.
MiyamotoY.KnoepflerC. A.IshiiK.JiL.-J. (2013). Cultural variation in the focus on goals versus processes of actions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(6), 707–719. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213483579
32.
NewmanD. B.SchugJ.YukiM.YamadaJ.NezlekJ. B. (2018). The negative consequences of maximizing in friendship selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 114(5), 804–824. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000141
OishiS.GrahamJ. (2010). Social ecology: Lost and found in psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(4), 356–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610374588
35.
OishiS.SchugJ.YukiM.AxtJ. (2015). The psychology of residential and relational mobilities. In GelfandM. J.ChiuC.-Y.HongY.-Y. (Eds.), Handbook of advances in culture and psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 221–272). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190218966.003.0005
36.
OishiS.TsutsuiY.EgglestonC.GalinhaI. C. (2014). Are maximizers unhappier than satisficers? A comparison between Japan and the USA. Journal of Research in Personality, 49, 14–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2013.12.001
37.
PatalanoA. L.LeClairZ. (2011). The influence of group decision making on indecisiveness-related decisional confidence. Judgment and Decision Making, 6(2), 163–175. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1930297500004113
38.
PatalanoA. L.WengrovitzS. M. (2006). Cross-cultural exploration of the Indecisiveness Scale: A comparison of Chinese and American men and women. Personality and Individual Differences, 41(5), 813–824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.03.023
39.
RassinE.MurisP. (2005a). Indecisiveness and the interpretation of ambiguous situations. Personality and Individual Differences, 39(7), 1285–1291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.06.006
40.
RassinE.MurisP. (2005b). To be or not to be. . .indecisive: Gender differences, correlations with obsessive-compulsive complaints, and behavioural manifestation. Personality and Individual Differences, 38(5), 1175–1181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2004.07.014
41.
RassinE.MurisP.FrankenI.SmitM.WongM. (2007). Measuring general indecisiveness. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 29(1), 61–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-006-9023-z
42.
SaitoS.MidorikawaA. (2016). Development of the Japanese Indecisiveness (Yujufudan) Scale. The Japanese Journal of Psychology, 87(5), 535–545. [In Japanese]. https://doi.org/10.4992/jjpsy.87.15227
43.
SatoK.YukiM.NorasakkunkitV. (2014). A socio-ecological approach to cross-cultural differences in the sensitivity to social rejection: The partially mediating role of relational mobility. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45(10), 1549–1560. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022114544320
44.
SchreierS.-S.HeinrichsN.AldenL.RapeeR. M.HofmannS. G.ChenJ.OhK. J.BögelsS. (2010). Social anxiety and social norms in individualistic and collectivistic countries. Depression and Anxiety, 27(12), 1128–1134. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.20746
45.
SchugJ.YukiM.HorikawaH.TakemuraK. (2009). Similarity attraction and actually selecting similar others: How cross-societal differences in relational mobility affect interpersonal similarity in Japan and the USA. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 12(2), 95–103. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.2009.12.issue-210.1111/j.1467-839X.2009.01277.x
46.
SchugJ.YukiM.MadduxW. (2010). Relational mobility explains between- and within-culture differences in self-disclosure to close friends. Psychological Science, 21(10), 1471–1478. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610382786
47.
StephensN. M.FrybergS. A.MarkusH. R.JohnsonC. S.CovarrubiasR. (2012). Unseen disadvantage: How American universities’ focus on independence undermines the academic performance of first-generation college students. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(6), 1178–1197. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027143
48.
TaylorS. E.ShermanD. K.KimH. S.JarchoJ.TakagiK.DunaganM. S. (2004). Culture and social support: Who seeks it and why?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(3), 354–362. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.3.354
49.
ThomsonR.YukiM.TalhelmT.SchugJ.KitoM.AyanianA. H.BeckerJ. C.BeckerM.ChiuC-yChoiH.-S.FerreiraC. M.FülöpM.GulP.Houghton-IlleraA. M.JoasooM.JongJ.KavanaghC. M.KhutkyyD.ManziC.. . . VissermanM. L. (2018). Relational mobility predicts social behaviors in 39 countries and is tied to historical farming and threat. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(29), 7521–7526. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1713191115
50.
WatanabeS. (1998). Manager-subordinate relationship in Cross-cultural organizations: The case of Japanese subsidiaries in the United States. International Journal of Japanese Sociology, 7(1), 23–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6781.1998.tb00055.x
51.
WatanabeS.YamaguchiR. (1995). Intercultural perceptions at the workplace: The case of the British subsidiaries of Japanese firms. Human Relations, 48(5), 581–607. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679504800507
52.
YamadaJ.KitoM.YukiM. (2017). Passion, relational mobility, and proof of commitment: A comparative socio–ecological analysis of an adaptive emotion in a sexual market. Evolutionary Psychology, 15(4), Article 1474704917746056. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704917746056
53.
YamagishiT.HashimotoH.SchugJ. (2008). Preferences versus strategies as explanations for culture-specific behavior. Psychological Science, 19(6), 579–584. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02126.x
54.
YamagishiT.YamagishiM. (1994). Trust and commitment in the United States and Japan. Motivation and Emotion, 18(2), 129–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02249397
55.
YatesJ. F.JiL. J.OkaT.LeeJ. W.ShinotsukaH.SieckW. R. (2010). Indecisiveness and culture: Incidence, values, and thoroughness. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 41(3), 428–444. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022109359692
56.
YatesJ. F.LeeJ. W.ShinotsukaH.PatalanoA. L.SieckW. R. (1998). Cross-cultural variations in probability judgment accuracy: Beyond general knowledge overconfidence?Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2(74), 89–117. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1998.2771
YukiM.SchugJ. (2012). Relational mobility: A socioecological approach to personal relationships. In GillathO.AdamsG.KunkelA. (Eds.), Relationship science: Integrating evolutionary, neuroscience, and sociocultural approaches (pp. 137–151). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13489-007
YukiM.SchugJ.HorikawaH.TakemuraK.SatoK.YokotaK.Kamaya. (2007). Development of a scale to measure perceptions of relational mobility in society (CERSS Working Paper 75). Center for Experimental Research in Social Sciences, Hokkaido University.
61.
ZouX.TamK.-P.MorrisM. W.LeeS.-l.LauI. Y.-M.ChiuC.-y. (2009). Culture as common sense: Perceived consensus versus personal beliefs as mechanisms of cultural influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(4), 579–597. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016399
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
