Although individuals of Latin American heritage (Latin Americans in short) are considered interdependent, they also value traits like uniqueness and positivity, like individuals of European American cultural heritage, who are considered independent. It remains unclear whether this inclination toward positivity extends to a bias in self-perception known as self-enhancement. Moreover, if Latin Americans are indeed self-enhancing, it is uncertain how these tendencies align with their interdependent cultural orientation. In this article, we report three studies (N = 1,246) with three operationalizations of self-enhancement. We found that Mexicans, Colombians, and Ecuadorians show self-enhancement that is mostly similar in magnitude to European Americans. Notably, Study 3 found that self-enhancement is related to interdependence in Latin America: Unlike European Americans, Latin Americans in Ecuador exhibited stronger self-enhancement when interdependence is primed rather than independence. Our findings suggest that among Latin American individuals, self-enhancement not only exists but also reinforces interdependence.
AdlerN. E.EpelE. S.CastellazzoG.IckovicsJ. R. (2000). Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: Preliminary data in healthy white women. Health Psychology: Official Journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association, 19(6), 586–592. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-6133.19.6.586
2.
AlickeM. D.KlotzM. L.BreitenbecherD. L.YurakT. J.VredenburgD. S. (1995). Personal contact, individuation, and the better-than-average effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(5), 804–825. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.68.5.804
3.
CamposB.KimH. S. (2017). Incorporating the cultural diversity of family and close relationships into the study of health. American Psychologist, 72(6), 543–554. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000122
4.
ChangE. C.AsakawaK. (2003). Cultural variations on optimistic and pessimistic bias for self versus a sibling: Is there evidence for self-enhancement in the West and for self-criticism in the East when the referent group is specified?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(3), 569–581. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.3.569
5.
de OliveiraS.NisbettR. E. (2017). Beyond East and West: Cognitive style in Latin America. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 48(10), 1554–1577. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022117730816
6.
DunningD.MeyerowitzJ.HolzbergA. (1989). Ambiguity and self-evaluation: The role of idiosyncratic trait definitions in self-serving assessments of ability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1082–1090. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1082
7.
HeineS. J.HamamuraT. (2007). In search of East Asian self-enhancement. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11(1), 4–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868306294587
8.
HeineS. J.KitayamaS.LehmanD. R.TakataT.IdeE.LeungC.MatsumotoH. (2001). Divergent consequences of success and failure in Japan and North America: An investigation of self-improving motivations and malleable selves. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(4), 599–615. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.4.599
9.
HeineS. J.LehmanD. R. (1995). Cultural variation in unrealistic optimism: Does the West feel more vulnerable than the East?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(4), 595–607. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.68.4.595
10.
HeineS. J.LehmanD. R.MarkusH. R.KitayamaS. (1999). Is there a universal need for positive self-regard?Psychological Review, 106(4), 766–794. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.106.4.766
11.
HofstedeG. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Sage.
12.
HollowayR. A.WaldripA. M.IckesW. (2009). Evidence that a simpático self-schema accounts for differences in the self-concepts and social behavior of Latinos versus Whites (and Blacks). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 1012–1028. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013883
13.
KitayamaS.MarkusH. R.MatsumotoH.NorasakkunkitV. (1997). Individual and collective processes in the construction of the self: Self-enhancement in the United States and self-criticism in Japan. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(6), 1245–1267. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.6.1245
14.
KitayamaS.ParkH.SevincerA. T.KarasawaM.UskulA. K. (2009). A cultural task analysis of implicit independence: Comparing North America, Western Europe, and East Asia. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(2), 236–255. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015999
15.
KitayamaS.SalvadorC. E. (2017). Culture embrained: Going beyond the nature-nurture dichotomy. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(5), 841–854. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617707317
KitayamaS.SalvadorC. E.NanakdewaK.RossmaierA.San MartinA.SavaniK. (2022). Varieties of interdependence and the emergence of the Modern West: Toward the globalizing of psychology. American Psychologist, 77, 991–1006. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001073
18.
KrugerJ.DunningD. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 14, 1121–1134.
19.
KrysK.VignolesV. L.de AlmeidaI.UchidaY. (2022). Outside the “cultural binary”: Understanding Why Latin American collectivist societies foster independent selves. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 17, 1166–1187. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916211029632
20.
MalleB. F. (2006). The actor-observer asymmetry in attribution: A (surprising) meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 132(6), 895–919. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.6.895
21.
MarkusH. R.KitayamaS. (1991a). Cultural variation in the self-concept. In StraussJ.GoethalsG. R. (Eds.), The self: Interdisciplinary approaches (pp. 18–48). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-8264-5_2
22.
MarkusH. R.KitayamaS. (1991b). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224–253. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224
23.
MezulisA.AbramsonL.HydeJ.HankinB. (2004). Is there a universal positivity bias in attributions? A meta-analytic review of individual, developmental, and cultural differences in the self-serving attributional bias. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 711–747. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.130.5.711
24.
MillerD. T.RossM. (1975). Self-serving biases in the attribution of causality: Fact or fiction?Psychological Bulletin, 82(2), 213–225. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076486
25.
Ramírez-EsparzaN.ChungC. K.Sierra-OteroG.PennebakerJ. W. (2012). Cross-cultural constructions of self-schemas: Americans and Mexicans. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43(2), 233–250. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022110385231
26.
Ramírez-EsparzaN.GoslingS. D.PennebakerJ. W. (2008). Paradox lost: Unraveling the puzzle of simpatía. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39(6), 703–715. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022108323786
27.
Ramírez-EsparzaN.MehlM. R.Álvarez-BermúdezJ.PennebakerJ. W. (2009). Are Mexicans more or less sociable than Americans? Insights from a naturalistic observation study. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2008.09.002
28.
Rodríguez-ArauzG.Ramírez-EsparzaN.García-SierraA.IkizerE. G.Fernández-GómezM. J. (2019). You go before me, please: Behavioral politeness and interdependent self as markers of Simpatía in Latinas. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 25(3), 379–387. https://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000232
29.
SalvadorC. E.Idrovo CarlierS.IshiiK.Torres CastilloC.NanakdewaK.San MartinA.SavaniK.KitayamaS. (2023). Emotionally expressive interdependence in Latin America: Triangulating through a comparison of three cultural zones. Emotion, 24, 820–835. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0001302
30.
SalvadorC. E.KamikuboA.KrausB.HsiaoN.-C.HuJ.-F.KarasawaM.KitayamaS. (2022). Self-referential processing accounts for cultural variation in self-enhancement versus criticism: An electrocortical investigation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 151(8), 1904–1918. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001154
31.
SalvadorC. E.WhiteC. J. M.AiT. (2024). Who is your biggest critic? Cultural variation in moral judgments of the self and others. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 55, 535–552. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220221241255673
32.
SanchezC.DunningD. (2019). Cultural patterns explain the worldwide perception/performance paradox in student self-assessments of math and science skill. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10(7), 935–945. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550618801003
33.
San MartinA.SinaceurM.MadiA.TompsonS.MadduxW. W.KitayamaS. (2018). Self-assertive interdependence in Arab culture. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(11), 830–837. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0435-z
34.
SavaniK.AlvarezA.MesquitaB.MarkusH. R. (2013). Feeling close and doing well: The prevalence and motivational effects of interpersonally engaging emotions in Mexican and European American cultural contexts. International Journal of Psychology, 48(4), 682–694. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207594.2012.688131
35.
SedikidesC.GaertnerL.ToguchiY. (2003). Pancultural self-enhancement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(1), 60–79. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.1.60
36.
SenftN.CamposB.ShiotaM. N.Chentsova-DuttonY. E. (2021). Who emphasizes positivity? An exploration of emotion values in people of Latino, Asian, and European heritage living in the United States. Emotion, 21, 707–719. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000737
37.
TaylorS. E.BrownJ. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103(2), 193–210. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.2.193
38.
TaylorS. E.BrownJ. D. (1994). Positive illusions and well-being revisited: Separating fact from fiction. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 21–27.
39.
TelzerE. H.MastenC. L.BerkmanE. T.LiebermanM. D.FuligniA. J. (2010). Gaining while giving: An fMRI study of the rewards of family assistance among White and Latino youth. Social Neuroscience, 5(5–6), 508–518. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470911003687913
40.
ThomsonR.YukiM.TalhelmT.SchugJ.KitoM.AyanianA. H.BeckerJ. C.BeckerM.ChiuC.ChoiH.-S.FerreiraC. M.FülöpM.GulP.Houghton-IlleraA. M.JoasooM.JongJ.KavanaghC. M.KhutkyyD.ManziC.. . . VissermanM. L. (2018). Relational mobility predicts social behaviors in 39 countries and is tied to historical farming and threat. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(29), 7521–7526. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1713191115
41.
TrafimowD.TriandisH. C.GotoS. G. (1991). Some tests of the distinction between the private self and the collective self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(5), 649–655. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.5.649
42.
TriandisH. C. (1989). The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychological Review, 96, 506–520.
43.
TriandisH. C.MarínG.LisanskyJ.BetancourtH. (1984). Simpatía as a cultural script of Hispanics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(6), 1363–1375. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.47.6.1363
44.
VignolesV. L.OweE.BeckerM.SmithP. B.EasterbrookM. J.BrownR.GonzálezR.DidierN.CarrascoD.CadenaM. P.LayS.SchwartzS. J.Des RosiersS. E.VillamarJ. A.GavreliucA.ZinkengM.KreuzbauerR.BagumaP.MartinM.. . . BondM. H. (2016). Beyond the “East–West” dichotomy: Global variation in cultural models of selfhood. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(8), 966–1000. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000175
45.
ZárateM. A.UlemanJ. S.VoilsC. I. (2001). Effects of culture and processing goals on the activation and binding of trait concepts. Social Cognition, 19(3), 295–323. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.19.3.295.21469
46.
ZellE.StrickhouserJ.SedikidesC.AlickeM. (2019). The better-than-average effect in comparative self- evaluation: A comprehensive review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 146, 118–149. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000218
47.
ZhangY.AlickeM. (2021). My true self is better than yours: Comparative bias in true self judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 47(2), 216–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167220919213
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
