Prior research finds that hierarchical representation–the vertical distribution of minorities across a hierarchy–can influence team attractiveness. Extending these findings, we offer a novel account for why these perceptions arise: teams with minorities clustered in low-ranking positions are perceived as less diverse and more conflict-prone than equally diverse teams with hierarchical representation. Across five studies (N = 2946), participants perceived teams with low hierarchical representation as less attractive than teams with hierarchical representation, regardless of participant race. Teams with low hierarchical representation were considered just as unattractive as teams with lower numerical diversity (Study 2). Individuals also underestimated the percentage of Black employees present in teams with low hierarchical representation, signaling a “diversity deflation” effect (Study 3). Conversely, teams with hierarchical representation were considered as attractive as diverse teams with flatter hierarchies (Study 4). The effect of hierarchical representation on attractiveness weakens for teams portrayed as conflict-laden (Study 5).
Auelua-ToomeyS. L.RobertsS. O. (2022). The effects of editorial-board diversity on race scholars and their scholarship: A field experiment. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 17(6), 1766-1777. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916211072
3.
AveryD. R. (2003). Reactions to diversity in recruitment advertising–are differences black and White?Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(4), 672-679. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.672
4.
AveryD. R.McKayP. F. (2006). Target practice: An organizational impression management approach to attracting minority and female job applicants. Personnel Psychology, 59(1), 157-187. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2006.00807.x
5.
BallingerT.CrockerJ. (2021). Understanding Whites’ perceptions of multicultural policies: A (non)zero-sum framework?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 120(5), 1231-1260. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000315
6.
BinningK. R.UnzuetaM. M. (2012). Perceiving ethnic diversity on campus: Group differences in attention to hierarchical representation. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4(4), 500-507. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550612459771
7.
BlauP. M. (1968). The hierarchy of authority in organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 73(4), 453-467. https://doi.org/10.1086/224506
8.
BlauP. M. (1977). Inequality and heterogeneity: A primitive theory of social structure (Vol. 7). New York: Free Press.
9.
BriefA. P.UmphressE. E.DietzJ.BurrowsJ. W.ButzR. M.ScholtenL. (2005). Community matters: Realistic group conflict theory and the impact of diversity. Academy of Management Journal, 48(5), 830-844. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2005.18803925
10.
BundersonJ. S.Van der VegtG. S. (2018). Diversity and inequality in management teams: A review and integration of research on vertical and horizontal member differences. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 5, 47-73. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104500
11.
BundersonJ. S.Van Der VegtG. S.CantimurY.RinkF. (2016). Different views of hierarchy and why they matter: Hierarchy as inequality or as cascading influence. Academy of Management Journal, 59(4), 1265-1289. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0601
12.
ChanceM. R. (1967). Attention structure as the basis of primate rank orders. Man, 2(4), 503-518. https://doi.org/10.2307/2799336
13.
ChenJ. M.HamiltonD. L. (2015). Understanding diversity: The importance of social acceptance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(4), 586-598. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215573495
14.
CheryanS.MarkusH. R. (2020). Masculine defaults: Identifying and mitigating hidden cultural biases. Psychological Review, 127(6), 1022-1052. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000209
15.
CheryanS.PlautV. C.DaviesP. G.SteeleC. M. (2009). Ambient belonging: How stereotypical cues impact gender participation in computer science. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(6), 1045-1060. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016239
16.
ChoiJ. N.SyT. (2010). Group-level organizational citizenship behavior: Effects of demographic faultlines and conflict in small work groups. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(7), 1032-1054. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.661
17.
ChristianJ.PorterL. W.MoffittG. (2006). Workplace diversity and group relations: An overview. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 9(4), 459-466. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430206068431
EdmondsonA. C.BransbyD. P. (2023). Psychological safety comes of age: Observed themes in an established literature. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 10(1), 55-78. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-120920-055217
20.
EdmondsonA. C.LeiZ. (2014). Psychological safety: The history, renaissance, and future of an interpersonal construct. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 23-43. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091305
21.
EmersonR. M. (1962). Power-dependence relations. American Sociological Review, 27(1), 31-41. https://doi.org/10.2307/2089716
22.
FathS.KayA. C. (2018). “If hierarchical, then corrupt”: Exploring people’s tendency to associate hierarchy with corruption in organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 149, 145-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2018.10.004
23.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.BuchnerA.LangA. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G* Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149-1160.
GeorgeacO. A. M.RattanA. (2023). The business case for diversity backfires: Detrimental effects of organizations’ instrumental diversity rhetoric for underrepresented group members’ sense of belonging. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 124(1), 69-108. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000394
27.
GoodC.RattanA.DweckC. S. (2012). Why do women opt out? Sense of belonging and women's representation in mathematics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(4), 700-717. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026659
GreerL. L.de JongB. A.SchoutenM. E.DannalsJ. E. (2018). Why and when hierarchy impacts team effectiveness: A meta-analytic integration. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(6), 591.
30.
GreerL. L.van KleefG. A. (2010). Equality versus differentiation: The effects of power dispersion on group interaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(6), 1032-1044. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020373
31.
GündemirS.HomanA. C.UsovaA.GalinskyA. D. (2017). Multicultural meritocracy: The synergistic benefits of valuing diversity and merit. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 73, 34-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.06.002
32.
HalevyN.Y. ChouE.D. GalinskyA. (2011). A functional model of hierarchy: Why, how, and when vertical differentiation enhances group performance. Organizational Psychology Review, 1(1), 32-52. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041386610380991
33.
HarrisonD. A.KleinK. J. (2007). What’s the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1199-1228. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.26586096
34.
HarrisonD. A.PriceK. H.GavinJ. H.FloreyA. T. (2002). Time, teams, and task performance: Changing effects of surface-and deep-level diversity on group functioning. Academy of Management Journal, 45(5), 1029-1045. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069328
35.
HayesA. F. (2013). Methodology in the social sciences. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
36.
HighhouseS.LievensF.SinarE. F. (2003). Measuring attraction to organizations. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63(6), 986-1001. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164403258403
37.
JeffersonH. (2023). The politics of respectability and Black Americans’ punitive attitudes. American Political Science Review, 117(4), 1448-1464. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055422001289
38.
JehnK. A.BezrukovaK. (2004). A field study of group diversity, workgroup context, and performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(6), 703-729. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.257
39.
JehnK. A.BezrukovaK. (2010). The faultline activation process and the effects of activated faultlines on coalition formation, conflict, and group outcomes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 112(1), 24-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.11.008
40.
JehnK.BezrukovaK.ThatcherS. M. B.2008. Conflict, diversity, and faultlines in workgroups. In De DreuC. K.W.GelfandM. (Eds.), The psychology of conflict and conflict management in organizations: 179-210. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
KafkaA. M. (2023). Seeing through woke-washing: Effects of projected diversity values and leader racial diversity on equity in workplace outcomes. Consulting Psychology Journal, 75(1), 94-118. https://doi.org/10.1037/cpb0000237
43.
KanterR. M. (1977). Some effects of proportions on group life: Skewed sex ratios and responses to token women. American Journal of Sociology, 82(5), 965-990. https://doi.org/10.1086/226425
44.
LauD. C.MurnighanJ. K. (1998). Demographic diversity and faultlines: The compositional dynamics of organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 325-340. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.533229
45.
LauD. C.MurnighanJ. K. (2005). Interactions within groups and subgroups: The effects of demographic faultlines. Academy of Management Journal, 48(4), 645-659. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2005.17843943
46.
LuJ. G.NisbettR. E.MorrisM. W. (2020). Why East Asians but not South Asians are underrepresented in leadership positions in the United States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(9), 4590-4600.
MageeJ. C.GalinskyA. D. (2008). Social hierarchy: The self-reinforcing nature of power and status. Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 351-398. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520802211628
49.
MartinA. E.SlepianM. L. (2021). The primacy of gender: Gendered cognition underlies the big two dimensions of social cognition. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(6), 1143-1158. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620904961
50.
McGinnK. L.MilkmanK. L. (2013). Looking up and looking out: Career mobility effects of demographic similarity among professionals. Organization Science, 24(4), 1041-1060. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1120.0778
51.
MurphyM. C.SteeleC. M.GrossJ. J. (2007). Signaling threat: How situational cues affect women in math, science, and engineering settings. Psychological science, 18(10), 879-885. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01995.x
52.
NembhardI. M.EdmondsonA. C. (2006). Making it safe: The effects of leader inclusiveness and professional status on psychological safety and improvement efforts in health care teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(7), 941-966. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.413
53.
NicholsA. D.AxtJ.GosnellE.ArielyD. (2023). A field study of the impacts of workplace diversity on the recruitment of minority group members. Nature Human Behavior, 7, 2212-2227. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01731-5
54.
ObenauerW. G.KalsherM. J. (2023). Is white always the standard? Using replication to revisit and extend what we know about the leadership prototype. The Leadership Quarterly, 34(4), 101633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2022.101633
55.
PerkinsL. A.ThomasK. M.TaylorG. A. (2000). Advertising and recruitment: Marketing to minorities. Psychology & Marketing, 17(3), 235-255.
56.
PfefferJ. (1981). Power in organizations. Pitman.
57.
Purdie-VaughnsV.SteeleC. M.DaviesP. G.DitlmannR.CrosbyJ. R. (2008). Social identity contingencies: How diversity cues signal threat or safety for African Americans in mainstream institutions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(4), 615-630. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.4.615
58.
RavlinE. C.ThomasD. C. (2005). Status and stratification processes in organizational life. Journal of Management, 31(6), 966-987. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305279898
59.
SchminkeM.CropanzanoR.RuppD. E. (2002). Organization structure and fairness perceptions: The moderating effects of organizational level. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89(1), 881-905. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00034-1
60.
ShemlaM.MeyerB.GreerL.JehnK. A. (2016). A review of perceived diversity in teams: Does how members perceive their team's composition affect team processes and outcomes?Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(1), 89-106. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1957
61.
SinghB.WinkelD. E.SelvarajanT. T. (2013). Managing diversity at work: Does psychological safety hold the key to racial differences in employee performance?Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 86(2), 242-263. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12015
62.
ThatcherS. M.JehnK. A.ZanuttoE. (2003). Cracks in diversity research: The effects of diversity faultlines on conflict and performance. Group Decision and Negotiation, 12(3), 217-241. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023325406946
63.
TostL. P.GinoF.LarrickR. P. (2013). When power makes others speechless: The negative impact of leader power on team performance. Academy of Management Journal, 56(5), 1465-1486. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0180
UbakaA.LuX.GutierrezL. (2023). Testing the generalizability of the white leadership standard in the post-Obama era. The Leadership Quarterly, 34(4), 101591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2021.101591
66.
UnzuetaM. M.BinningK. R. (2010). Which racial groups are associated with diversity?Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology, 16(3), 443-446. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019723
67.
UnzuetaM. M.BinningK. R. (2012). Diversity is in the eye of the beholder: How concern for the in-group affects perceptions of racial diversity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(1), 26-38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211418528
WalkerH. J.FeildH. S.BernerthJ. B.BectonJ. B. (2012). Diversity cues on recruitment websites: Investigating the effects on job seekers’ information processing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(1), 214-224. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025847
70.
WilliamsK. Y.O'ReillyC. AIII. (1998). Demography and diversity in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 20, 77-140.
71.
WillrothE. C.AthertonO. E. (2024). Best laid plans: A guide to reporting preregistration deviations. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 7(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/251524592312138
72.
WiltonL. S.BellA. N.VahradyanM.KaiserC. R. (2020). Show don’t tell: Diversity dishonesty harms racial/ethnic minorities at work. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46(8), 1171-1185. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167219897149
73.
WindscheidL.Bowes-SperryL.KidderD. L.CheungH. K.MornerM.LievensF. (2016). Actions speak louder than words: Outsiders’ perceptions of diversity mixed messages. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(9), 1329-1341. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000107
74.
YuS.GreerL. L.HalevyN.Van BunderenL. (2019). On ladders and pyramids: Hierarchy’s shape determines relationships and performance in groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(12), 1717-1733. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167219842867
75.
ZitekE. M.TiedensL. Z. (2012). The fluency of social hierarchy: The ease with which hierarchical relationships are seen, remembered, learned, and liked. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(1), 98-115. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025345
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
