Does residential mobility change cultures, or is it merely a downstream indicator for other forces? Using large-scale surveys of citizens of 18 industrialized nations, we find that increased rates of residential mobility predict living in a more dynamic society at least 10 years in the future: one in which residents are more satisfied with their lives, have greater optimism, endorse more individualistic concepts, are more open to new ideas, have a greater sense of freedom of action, feel able to make friends more easily, express a more cosmopolitan identity, believe that their society rewards merit, and hold their community to a higher standard for treatment of minorities. These findings are echoed in the experience of Americans who have themselves recently moved, where we find that having successfully moved predicts a future sense of personal thriving, optimism, and a belief that merit is rewarded.
AbrajanoM.HajnalZ. L. (2015). White backlash: Immigration, race and American politics. Princeton University Press.
2.
AbramitzkyR.BoustanL.JacomeE.PerezS. (2021). Intergenerational mobility of immigrants in the United States over two centuries. American Economic Review, 111(2), 580–608.
3.
AlvarezM.BernardA.LieskeS. N. (2021). Understanding internal migration trends in OECD countries. Population, Space and Place, 27(7), e2451.
4.
BarclayP. (2016). Biological markets and the effects of partner choice on cooperation and friendship. Current Opinion in Psychology, 7, 33–38.
5.
BaumeisterR. F. (1987). How the self became a problem: A psychological review of historical research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(1), 163–176.
6.
BazziS.FiszbeinM.GebresilasseM. (2020). Frontier culture: The roots and persistence of “rugged individualism” in the United States. Econometrica, 88(6), 2329–2368.
7.
BishopB. (2008). The big sort: Why the clustering of like-minded America is tearing us apart. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
8.
BleidornW.SchönbrodtF.GebauerJ. E.RentfrowP. J.PotterJ.GoslingS. D. (2016). To live among like-minded others: Exploring the links between person-city personality fit and self-esteem. Psychological Science, 27(3), 419–427.
9.
BorschelE.ZimmermannJ.CrocettiE.MeeusW.NoackP.NeyerF. J. (2019). Me and you in a mobile world: The development of regional identity and personal relationships in young adulthood. Developmental Psychology, 55(5), 1072–1087.
10.
ButtrickN.MoulderR.OishiS. (2020). Historical change in the moral foundations of political persuasion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46(11), 1523–1537.
11.
ButtrickN.OishiS. (2021). The cultural dynamics of declining residential mobility. American Psychologist, 76(6), 904–916.
12.
CarlingJ.SchewelK. (2018). Revisiting aspiration and ability in international migration. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 44(6), 945–963.
13.
ChanM.CheungF.LauC.MaT. F. (2021). Global trends in cross-cultural endorsement of social mobility: Evidence from 167 countries. American Psychologist, 76(6), 917–932.
14.
ChoiH.OishiS. (2020). The psychology of residential mobility: A decade of progress. Current Opinion in Psychology, 32, 72–75.
15.
ClarkW. A. V. (2005). Intervening in the residential mobility process: Neighborhood outcomes for low-income. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 15307–15312.
16.
ClarkW. A. VLisowskiW. (2017). Prospect theory and the decision to move or stay. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114(36), E7432–E7440.
17.
CoulterR. (2013). Wishful thinking and the abandonment of moving desires over the life course. Environment and Planning A, 45(8), 1944–1962.
18.
CoulterR.HamM. V.FindlayA. M. (2016). Re-thinking residential mobility: Linking lives through time and space. Progress in Human Geography, 40(3), 352–374.
19.
DeS.GelfandM. J.NauD.RoosP. (2015). The inevitability of ethnocentrism revisited: Ethnocentrism diminishes as mobility increases. Scientific Reports, 5, 1–7.
20.
DelheyJ.NewtonK.WelzelC. (2011). How general is trust in “most people”? Solving the radius of trust problem. American Sociological Review, 76(5), 786–807.
21.
DesmondM. (2016). Evicted: Poverty and profit in the American city. Crown.
22.
de TocquevilleA. (1840/1969). Democracy in America (LawrenceG., Trans.). Doubleday.
23.
DienerE.EmmonsR. A.LarsenR. J.GriffinS. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75.
24.
DienerE.WirtzD.TovW.Kim-PrietoC.ChoiD.OishiS.Biswas-DienerR. (2009). New measures of well-being: Flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research, 39, 247–266.
25.
EnkeB. (2023). Market exposure and human morality. Nature Human Behaviour, 7(1), 134–141.
26.
FairbrotherM. (2014). Two multilevel modeling techniques for analyzing comparative longitudinal survey datasets. Political Science Research Methods, 2, 119–140.
27.
FeldmanS. (1988). Structure and consistency in public opinion: The role of core beliefs and values. American Journal of Political Science, 32(2), 416–440.
28.
FosterT. B. (2017). Decomposing American immobility: Compositional and rate components of interstate, intrastate, and intracounty migration and mobility decline. Demographic Research, 37, 1515–1548.
29.
FosterT. B. (2018). The persistent black-white gap in and weakening link between expecting to move and actually moving. Sociology of Race and Ethnicity, 4(3), 353–370.
30.
GalstonW. A. (1988). Liberal virtues. American Political Science Review, 82(4), 1277–1290.
31.
GillespieB. J. (2016). Household mobility in America: Patterns, processes, and outcomes. Palgrave Macmillan.
32.
GoldschmidtW. (1971). Independence as an element in pastoral social systems. Anthropological Quarterly, 44, 132–142.
33.
GolinoH. F.EpskampS. (2017). Exploratory graph analysis: A new approach for estimating the number of dimensions in psychological research. PLOS ONE, 12(6), Article e0174035.
34.
GrangerC. W. J. (1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica, 37(3), 424–438.
35.
GreenfieldP. M. (2013). The changing psychology of culture from 1800 through 2000. Psychological Science, 24, 1722–1731.
36.
HaynieD. L.SouthS. J.BoseS. (2006). The company you keep: Adolescent mobility and peer behavior. Sociological Inquiry, 76, 397–426.
37.
HemmerN. (2022). Partisans: The conservative revolutionaries who remade American politics in the 1990s. Basic Books.
38.
HothornT.HornikK.Van De WielM. A.ZeileisA. (2008). Implementing a class of permutation tests: The coin package. Journal of Statistical Software, 28(8), 1–23.
39.
HruschkaD. J.HenrichJ. (2006). Friendship, cliquishness, and the emergence of cooperation. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 239, 1–15.
40.
HuntL. (2008). Inventing human rights: A history. W.W. Norton and Company.
41.
ItoK.TanT. S.-M.LeeA.LiL. M. W. (2019). Low residential mobility and novelty-seeking consumption. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 50(10), 1242–1252.
42.
JacksonJ. C.CaluoriN.GrayK.GelfandM. (2021). The new science of religious change. American Psychologist, 76(6), 838–850.
43.
JokelaM. (2009). Personality predicts migration within and between US states. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(1), 79–83.
44.
JokelaM. (2020). Neighborhoods, psychological distress, and the quest for causality. Current Opinion in Psychology, 32, 22–26.
45.
JokelaM.BleidornW.LambM. E.GoslingS. D.RentfrowP. J. (2015). Geographically varying associations between personality and life satisfaction in the London metropolitan area. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112(3), 725–730.
46.
JoshiP. D.WakslakC. J.RajM.TropeY. (2016). Communicating with distant others: The functional use of abstraction. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(1), 37–44.
47.
InglehartR.WelzelC. (2010). Changing mass priorities: The link between modernization and democracy. Perspectives on Politics, 8(2), 551–567.
48.
KangN.KwakN. (2003). A multilevel approach to civic participation: Individual length of residence, neighborhood residential stability, and their interactive effects with media use. Communication Research, 30, 80–106.
49.
KitayamaS.ConwayL. G.IIIPietromonacoP. R.ParkH.PlautV. C. (2010). Ethos of independence across regions in the United States: The production-adoption model of cultural change. American Psychologist, 65(6), 559–574.
50.
KitayamaS.IshiiK.ImadaT.TakemuraK.RamaswamyJ. (2006). Voluntary settlement and the spirit of independence: Evidence from Japan’s “northern frontier.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 369–384.
51.
KleinE. (2021). Why we’re polarized. Simon & Schuster.
52.
KleinerM. M.KruegerA. B. (2013). Analyzing the extent and influence of occupational licensing on the labor market. Journal of Labor Economics, 31(S1), S173–S202.
53.
KnudsenA. S. B. (2019). Those who stayed: Individualism, self-selection and cultural change during the age of mass migration. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3321790
54.
KoikkalainenS.KyleD. (2016). Imagining mobility: The prospective cognition question in migration research. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 42, 759–776.
55.
KralyE. P.Abbasi-ShavaziM. J.Torres ColónL. L.ReedH. E. (2023). Social consequences of forced and refugee migration. Annual Review of Sociology, 49, 129–153.
56.
LeeN.MorrisK.KemenyT. (2018). Immobility and the Brexit vote. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 11(1), 143–163.
57.
LesińskaM. (2014). The European backlash against immigration and multiculturalism. Journal of Sociology, 50(1), 37–50.
58.
LiL. M. W. (2017). Social class, social capital and residential mobility in China. Social Indicators Research, 132(3), 1117–1129.
59.
LiW. Q.LiL. M. W.LiM. (2019). Residential mobility reduces ingroup favouritism in prosocial behaviour. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 22(1), 3–17.
60.
LindE. A.TylerT. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. Plenum Press.
61.
LongL. H. (1988). Migration and residential mobility in the United States. Russell Sage Foundation.
62.
LongL. H.HansenK. A. (1977). Selectivity of black return migration to the South. Rural Sociology, 42(3), 317–331.
63.
LuM. (1999). Do people move when they say they will? Inconsistencies in individual migration behavior. Population and Environment, 20, 467–488.
64.
LunJ.OishiS.TenneyE. R. (2012). Residential mobility moderates preferences for egalitarian versus loyal helpers. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(1), 291–297.
65.
MacyM. W.SatoY. (2002). Trust, cooperation, and market formation in the US and Japan. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99(Suppl. 3), 7214–7220.
66.
MagdolL.BesselD. R. (2003). Social capital, social currency, and portable assets: The impact of residential mobility on exchanges of social support. Personal Relationships, 10, 149–170.
67.
MassaraG. P.Di MatteoT.AsteT. (2016). Network filtering for big data: Triangulated maximally filtered graph. Journal of Complex Networks, 5(2), 161–178.
68.
MateykaP. J. (2015). Desire to move and residential mobility: 2010–2011 (Report P70-14). U.S. Census Bureau.
69.
MayE. T. (2017). Fortress America: How we embraced fear and abandoned democracy. Basic Books.
70.
McGheeH. (2021). The sum of us: What racism costs everyone and how we can prosper together. One World.
71.
McNameeS. J.MillerR. K. (2009). The meritocracy myth. Rowman & Littlefield.
72.
MolloyR.SmithC. L.WozniakA. K. (2014). Declining migration within the US: The role of the labor market (No. w20065). National Bureau of Economic Research.
73.
ObschonkaM.StuetzerM.RentfrowP. J.Shaw-TaylorL.SatchellM.SilbereisenR. K.. . .GoslingS. D. (2018). In the shadow of coal: How large-scale industries contributed to present-day regional differences in personality and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 115(5), 903–927.
74.
OishiS. (2010). The psychology of residential mobility: Implications for the self, social relationships, and well-being. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(1), 5–21.
75.
OishiS. (2014). Socioecological psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 581–609.
76.
OishiS.KesebirS. (2012). Optimal social-networking strategy is a function of socioeconomic conditions. Psychological Science, 23(12), 1542–1548.
77.
OishiS.KesebirS.MiaoF. F.TalhelmT.EndoY.UchidaY.. . .NorasakkunkitV. (2013). Residential mobility increases motivation to expand social network: But why?Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(2), 217–223.
78.
OishiS.KrochikM.RothD.ShermanG. D. (2012). Residential mobility, personality, and wellbeing: An analysis of cortisol secretion. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 153–161.
79.
OishiS.LunJ.ShermanG. D. (2007). Residential mobility, self-concept, and positive affect in social interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(1), 131–141.
80.
OishiS.RothmanA. J.SnyderM.SuJ.ZehmK.HertelA. W.. . .ShermanG. D. (2007). The socio-ecological model of pro-community action: The benefits of residential stability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 831–844.
81.
OishiS.SaekiM.AxtJ. (2015). Are people living in walkable areas healthier and more satisfied with life?Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 7(3), 365–386.
82.
OishiS.TalhelmT. (2012). Residential mobility: What psychological research reveals. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 425–430.
83.
OishiS.TalhelmT.LeeM.KomiyaA.AkutsuS. (2015). Residential mobility and low-commitment groups. Archives of Scientific Psychology, 3(1), 54–61.
84.
OishiS.TsangS. (2022). The socio-ecological psychology of residential mobility. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 32(3), 519–536.
85.
OkunM. A.SchultzA. (2003). Age and motives for volunteering: Testing hypotheses derived from socioemotional selectivity theory. Psychology and Aging, 18(2), 231–239.
86.
PerlsteinR. (2020). Reaganland: America’s right turn 1976-1980. Simon & Schuster.
87.
PutnamR. D. (2000). Bowling alone: Revised and updated: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster.
88.
PutnamR. D. (2007). E pluribus unum: Diversity and community in the twenty-first century: The 2006 Johan Skytte prize lecture. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30(2), 137–174.
89.
RodgersD. T. (2012). Age of fracture. Belknap Press.
90.
RoosP.GelfandM.NauD.CarrR. (2014). High strength-of-ties and low mobility enable the evolution of third-party punishment. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 281, 20132661.
91.
RothsteinR. (2017). The color of law: A forgotten history of how our government segregated America. Liveright Publishing.
92.
SampsonR. J.RaudenbushS. W.EarlsF. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277, 918–924.
93.
SantosH. C.VarnumM. E.GrossmannI. (2017). Global increases in individualism. Psychological Science, 28(9), 1228–1239.
94.
SatoK.YukiM.NorasakkunkitV. (2014). A socio-ecological approach to cross-cultural differences in the sensitivity to social rejection: The partially mediating role of relational mobility. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45, 1549–1560.
95.
SchewelK. (2020). Understanding immobility: Moving beyond the mobility bias in migration studies. International Migration Review, 54(2), 328–355.
96.
ShahS. (2020). The next great migration: The story of movement on a changing planet. Bloomsbury.
97.
SharkeyP. (2013). Stuck in place: Urban neighborhoods and the end of progress toward racial equality. University of Chicago Press.
98.
SngO.NeubergS. L.VarnumM. E.KenrickD. T. (2018). The behavioral ecology of cultural psychological variation. Psychological Review, 125(5), 714–743.
99.
SpencerP. (1965). The Samburu: A study of gerontocracy in a nomadic tribe. University of California Press.
100.
SquireP.WolfingerR. E.GlassD. P. (1987). Residential mobility and voter turnout. American Political Science Review, 81(1), 45–65.
101.
SteegenS.TuerlinckxF.GelmanA.VanpaemelW. (2016). Increasing transparency through a multiverse analysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(5), 702–712.
102.
SuJ. C.ChiuC. Y.LinW. F.OishiS. (2016). Social monitoring matters for deterring social deviance in stable but not mobile socio-ecological contexts. PLOS ONE, 11, Article e0167053.
103.
SznycerD.TakemuraK.DeltonA. W.SatoK.RobertsonT.CosmidesL.ToobyJ. (2012). Cross-cultural differences and similarities in proneness to shame: An adaptationist and ecological approach. Evolutionary Psychology, 10, 352–370.
104.
TalhelmT.OishiS. (2014). Residential mobility affects self- concept, group support, and happiness of individuals and communities. In RentfrowP. J. (Ed.), Geographical psychology: Exploring the interaction of environment and behavior (pp. 219–239). American Psychological Association.
105.
TaylorC. (1989). Sources of the self: The making of the modern identity. Harvard University Press.
106.
ThomsonR.YukiM.TalhelmT.SchugJ.KitoM.AyanianA. H.. . .VissermanM. L. (2018). Relational mobility predicts social behaviors in 39 countries and is tied to historical farming and threat. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115, 7521–7526.
107.
VarnumM. E.GrossmannI. (2017). Cultural change: The how and the why. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12, 956–972.
WangC. S.LeeM.KuG.LeungA. K.-Y. (2018). The cultural boundaries of perspective-taking: When and why perspective-taking reduces stereotyping. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44, 928–943.
110.
WuJ.BallietD.van LangeP. A. (2016). Gossip versus punishment: The efficiency of reputation to promote and maintain cooperation. Scientific Reports, 6, 1–8.
111.
YamagishiT. (1998). The structure of trust. University of Tokyo Press.
112.
YukiM.SchugJ. (2020). Psychological consequences of relational mobility. Current Opinion in Psychology, 32, 129–132.
113.
ZimmermannJ.NeyerF. J. (2013). Do we become a different person when hitting the road? Personality development of sojourners. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105(3), 515–530.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
