Previous studies have found that exerting effort can lead people to engage in risk-taking behaviors. While effort can be either cognitive or physical, risk-taking can take place in either a risky context with known outcome probabilities or an ambiguous context with unknown outcome probabilities. The goal of the current research is to investigate how effort type and decision context influence risk-taking after effort exertion. Across three experiments, we find evidence that investing effort increases risk-taking at a short timescale. Importantly, this effect is particularly noticeable when the chance of winning is low, rather than when it is uncertain. Furthermore, the increase in risk-taking happens regardless of whether the effort is cognitive or physical. These findings suggest the existence of a cost-invariant but decision context-variant mechanism for the risk-taking after-effect of effort expenditure, which helps to bring the negative emotions caused by effort exertion back to a state of emotional homeostasis.
BatesD.MaechlerM.BolkerB.WalkerS. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48.
5.
BaumeisterR. F.BratslavskyE.MuravenM.TiceD. M. (1998). Ego depletion: Is the active self a limited resource?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(5), 1252–1265.
6.
BaumeisterR. F.HeathertonT. F. (1996). Self-regulation failure: An overview. Psychological Inquiry, 7(1), 1–15.
7.
BiałaszekW.MarcowskiP.OstaszewskiP. (2017). Physical and cognitive effort discounting across different reward magnitudes: Tests of discounting models. PLOS ONE, 12(7), Article e0182353.
8.
BlainB.SchmitC.AubryA.HausswirthC.Le MeurY.PessiglioneM. (2019). Neuro-computational impact of physical training overload on economic decision-making. Current Biology, 29(19), 3289–3297.
9.
BotelhoC.FernandesC.CamposC.SeixasC.PasionR.GarcezH.. . . PaivaT. O. (2023). Uncertainty deconstructed: Conceptual analysis and state-of-the-art review of the ERP correlates of risk and ambiguity in decision-making. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 23, 522–542.
10.
BrandM.EdmondsE.GrabenhorstF.BecharaA. (2007). Decisions under ambiguity and decisions under risk: Correlations with executive functions and comparisons of two different gambling tasks with implicit and explicit rules. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 29(1), 86–99.
11.
BrandM.LabuddaK.MarkowitschH. (2006). Neuropsychological correlates of decision-making in ambiguous and risky situations. Neural Networks, 19(8), 1266–1276.
12.
BruyneelS.DewitteS.FransesP.DekimpeM. (2009). I felt low and my purse feels light: Depleting mood regulation attempts affect risk decision making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 22(2), 153–170.
13.
CamererC.WeberM. (1992). Recent developments in modeling preferences: Uncertainty and ambiguity. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4), 325–370.
14.
ChibV. S.RangelA.ShimojoS.O’DohertyJ. P. (2009). Evidence for a common representation of decision values for dissimilar goods in human ventromedial prefrontal cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 29(39), 12315–12320.
CulbrethA.MoranE.BarchD. (2018). Effort-cost decision-making in psychosis and depression: Could a similar behavioral deficit arise from disparate psychological and neural mechanisms?Psychological Medicine, 48(6), 889–904.
17.
DamasioA.TranelD. (1991). Somatic markers and the guidance of behavior: Theory and preliminary testing. In LevinH. S.EisenbergH. M.BentonA. L. (Eds.), Frontal lobe function and dysfunction (pp. 217–229). Oxford University Press.
18.
De GrootK.ThurikR. (2018). Disentangling risk and uncertainty: When risk-taking measures are not about risk. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 2194.
19.
DengL.LiQ.ZhangM.ShiP.ZhengY. (2022). Distinct neural dynamics underlying risk and ambiguity during valued-based decision making. Psychophysiology, 60(3), Article e14201.
20.
DoraJ.InzlichtM. (2022). Effort expenditure decreases risk aversion when dealing with gains but not losses. PsyArXiv. https://osf.io/cqxfk/
21.
DreisbachG.FischerR. (2015). Conflicts as aversive signals for control adaptation. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24, 255–260.
22.
EllsbergD. (1961). Risk, ambiguity, and the savage axioms. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75(4), 643–669.
23.
EuteneuerF.SchaeferF.StuermerR.BoucseinW.TimmermannL.BarbeM.. . . KalbeE. (2009). Dissociation of decision-making under ambiguity and decision-making under risk in patients with Parkinson's disease: A neuropsychological and psychophysiological study. Neuropsychologia, 47(13), 2882–2890.
24.
FeldmanHallO.GlimcherP.BakerA.PhelpsE. (2016). Emotion and decision-making under uncertainty: Physiological arousal predicts increased gambling during ambiguity but not risk. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 145(10), 1255–1262.
25.
FeldmanHallO.GlimcherP.BakerA.PhelpsE. (2019). The functional roles of the amygdala and prefrontal cortex in processing uncertainty. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 31(11), 1742–1754.
26.
FoxJ.WeisbergS. (2019). An R companion to applied regression (3rd ed.). Sage.
27.
FreemanN.MuravenM. (2010). Self-control depletion leads to increased risk taking. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1(2), 175–181.
28.
FuentemillaL.CucurellD.Marco-PallaresJ.Guitart-MasipM.MorisJ.Rodriguez-FornellsA. (2013). Electrophysiological correlates of anticipating improbable but desired events. NeuroImage, 78, 135–144.
29.
FujinoJ.HiroseK.TeiS.KawadaR.TsurumiK.MatsukawaN.. . . TakahashiH. (2016). Ambiguity aversion in schizophrenia: An fMRI study of decision-making under risk and ambiguity. Schizophrenia Research, 178(1–3), 94–101.
30.
GaudeckerH.-M.SoestA.WengströmE. (2011). Heterogeneity in risky choice behaviour in a broad population. SSRN Electronic Journal, 101(2), 664–694.
31.
GreenP.MacLeodC. J. (2016). SIMR: An R package for power analysis of generalized linear mixed models by simulation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 7(4), 493–498.
32.
HsuM.BhattM.AdolphsR.TranelD.CamererC. (2005). Neural systems responding to degrees of uncertainty in human decision-making. Science, 310(5754), 1680–1683.
33.
HullC. L. (1943). Principles of behavior: An introduction to behavior theory. Appleton-Century-Crofts.
34.
HusainM.RoiserJ. (2018). Neuroscience of apathy and anhedonia: A transdiagnostic approach. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 19(8), 470–484.
35.
InzlichtM.BartholowB. D.HirshJ. B. (2015). Emotional foundations of cognitive control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(3), 126–132.
36.
InzlichtM.SchmeichelB. J.MacraeC. N. (2014). Why self-control seems (but may Not be) limited. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(3), 127–133.
37.
IsenA. M.PatrickR. (1983). The effect of positive feelings on risk taking: When the chips are down. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 31(2), 194–202.
38.
KahnemanD.TverskyA. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–291.
39.
KelleyN. J.FinleyA. J.SchmeichelB. J. (2019). After-effects of self-control: The reward responsivity hypothesis. Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 19(3), 600–618.
40.
KligerD.LevyO. (2003). Mood-induced variation in risk preferences. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 52, 573–584.
41.
KnightF. (1921). Risk, uncertainty and profit. Houghton Mifflin.
42.
KoolW.McGuireJ.RosenZ.BotvinickM. (2010). Decision making and the avoidance of cognitive demand. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 139(4), 665–682.
43.
KurzbanR. (2016). The sense of effort. Current Opinion in Psychology, 7, 67–70.
LevyI. (2017). Neuroanatomical substrates for risk behavior. The Neuroscientist, 23, 275–286.
46.
LevyI.SnellJ.NelsonA.RustichiniA.GlimcherP. (2010). Neural representation of subjective value under risk and ambiguity. Journal of Neurophysiology, 103(2), 1036–1047.
47.
LimL. X.FansherM.HélieS. (2023). Do cognitive and physical effort costs affect choice behavior similarly?Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 112, Article 102727.
48.
LoewensteinG.WeberE.HseeC.WelchN. (2001). Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin, 127(2), 267–286.
49.
Lopez-GamundiP.WardleM. (2018). The cognitive effort expenditure for rewards task (C-EEfRT): A novel measure of willingness to expend cognitive effort. Psychological Assessment, 30(9), 1237–1248.
50.
Lopez-GamundiP.YaoY.-W.ChongT.HeekerenH.Mas-HerreroE.Marco-PallarésJ. (2021). The neural basis of effort valuation: A meta-analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging studies. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 131, 1275–1287.
51.
MatuschekH.KlieglR.VasishthS.BaayenH.BatesD. (2017). Balancing type I error and power in linear mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 94, 305–315.
52.
MellersB.McGrawA. P. (2001). Anticipated emotions as guides to choice. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 210–214.
53.
MellersB.SchwartzA.HoK.RitovI. (1997). Decision affect theory: Emotional reactions to the outcomes of risky options. Psychological Science, 8, 423–429.
54.
MellersB.SchwartzA.RitovI. (1999). Emotion-based choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128(3), 332–345.
55.
MonsellS. (2003). Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(3), 134–140.
56.
MuravenM.CollinsR.NienhausK. (2002). Self-control and alcohol restraint: An initial application of the self-control strength model. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 16, 113–120.
57.
PeckC. (1986). A public mental health issue. Risk-taking behavior and compulsive gambling. The American Psychologist, 41, 461–465.
58.
RaghunathanR.PhamM. T. (1999). All negative moods are not equal: Motivational influences of anxiety and sadness on decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 79(1), 56–77.
59.
SchmeichelB.Harmon-JonesC.Harmon-JonesE. (2010). Exercising self-control increases approach motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(1), 162–173.
60.
SchmidtL.LebretonM.Clery-MelinM. L.DaunizeauJ.PessiglioneM. (2012). Neural mechanisms underlying motivation of mental versus physical effort. PLOS Biology, 10(2), Article e1001266.
61.
ShenhavA.MusslickS.LiederF.KoolW.GriffithsT.CohenJ.BotvinickM. M. (2017). Toward a rational and mechanistic account of mental effort. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 40(1), 99–124.
62.
ShmueliD.ProchaskaJ. J. (2009). Resisting tempting foods and smoking behavior: Implications from a self-control theory perspective. Health Psychology, 28(3), 300–306.
63.
TaylorS. E. (1981). The interface of cognitive and social psychology. In HarveyJ. H. (Ed.), Cognition, social behavior, and the environment (pp. 189–211). Erlbaum.
64.
TiceD.BratslavskyE.BaumeisterR. (2001). Emotional distress regulation takes precedence over impulse control: If you feel bad, do it!. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 53–67.
65.
TranT.HagenA. E. F.HollensteinT.BowieC. R. (2021). Physical- and cognitive-effort-based decision-making in depression: Relationships to symptoms and functioning. Clinical Psychological Science, 9(1), 53–67.
66.
TreadwayM. T.BuckholtzJ. W.CowanR. L.WoodwardN. D.LiR.AnsariM. S.. . . ZaldD. H. (2012). Dopaminergic mechanisms of individual differences in human effort-based decision-making. Journal of Neuroscience, 32(18), 6170–6176.
67.
TreadwayM. T.BuckholtzJ. W.SchwartzmanA. N.LambertW. E.ZaldD. H. (2009). Worth the ‘EEfRT’? The effort expenditure for rewards task as an objective measure of motivation and anhedonia. PLOS ONE, 4(8), Article e6598.
68.
TymulaA.Rosenberg BelmakerL.RoyA.RudermanL.MansonK.GlimcherP.LevyI. (2012). Adolescents' risk-taking behavior is driven by tolerance to ambiguity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(42), 17135–17140.
69.
TymulaA.Rosenberg BelmakerL.RudermanL.GlimcherP.LevyI. (2013). Like cognitive function, decision making across the life span shows profound age-related changes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(42), 17143–17148.
WardleM. C.TreadwayM. T.MayoL. M.ZaldD. H.de WitH. (2011). Amping up effort: Effects of d-amphetamine on human effort-based decision-making. Journal of Neuroscience, 31(46), 16597–16602.
72.
WeberE. U.BlaisA.-R.BetzN. E. (2002). A domain-specific risk-attitude scale: Measuring risk perceptions and risk behaviors. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 15(4), 263–290.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
