Three experiments tested how low versus high pitch generated from sources beyond a message communicator can affect reliance on thoughts and influence recipients’ attitudes. First, participants wrote positive or negative thoughts about an exam proposal (Experiments 1, 2) or their academic abilities (Experiment 3). Then, pitch from the message recipient (Experiment 1), channel (Experiment 2), or context (Experiment 3) was manipulated to be high or low. Experiment 1 showed that when participants vocally expressed their thoughts using low (vs. high) pitch, thoughts had a greater effect on attitudes toward exams. Experiment 2 revealed low (vs. high) pitch sounds from the keyboard participants used to write their thoughts produced the same effect on thought usage. Experiment 3 demonstrated that thoughts influenced attitudes more when listed while background music was low (vs. high) Pitch can influence attitudes through a meta-cognitive thought reliance process whether emerging from the recipient, channel, or context.
BrennanS. E.WilliamsM. (1995). The feeling of another’s knowing: Prosody and filled pauses as cues to listeners about the metacognitive states of speakers. Journal of Memory and Language, 34(3), 383–398. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1995.1017
2.
BriñolP.GascóM.PettyR. E.HorcajoJ. (2013). Treating thoughts as material objects can increase or decrease their impact on evaluation. Psychological Science, 24(1), 41–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612449176
3.
BriñolP.PettyR. E. (2003). Overt head movements and persuasion: A self-validation analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(6), 1123–1139. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.6.1123
4.
BriñolP.PettyR. E. (2022). Self-validation theory: An integrative framework for understanding when thoughts become consequential. Psychological Review, 129(2), 340–367. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000340
5.
BriñolP.PettyR. E.DursoR. O.RuckerD. D. (2017). Power and persuasion: Processes by which perceived power can influence evaluative judgments. Review of General Psychology, 21, 223–241. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000119
6.
BriñolP.PettyR. E.ValleC.RuckerD. D.BecerraA. (2007). The effects of message recipients’ power before and after persuasion: A self-validation analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 1040–1053. https://doi.org/10.1037/00223514.93.6.1040
7.
BriñolP.PettyR. E.WagnerB. (2009). Body postures effects on self-evaluation: A self-validation approach. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(6), 1053–1064. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.607
8.
BrookeM. E.Hung NgS. (1986). Language and social influence in small conversational groups. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 5(3), 201–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927x8600500303
9.
BrownB. L.GilesH.ThakerarJ. N. (1985). Speaker evaluations as a function of speech rate, accent and context. Language and Communication, 5(3), 207–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/0271-5309(85)90011-4
ChattopadhyayA.DahlD. W.RitchieR. J. B.SahinK. N. (2003). Hearing voices: The impact of announcer speech characteristics on consumer responses to broadcast advertising. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13, 198–204. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.340480
12.
ChebatJ.-C.HedhliK. E.Gélinas-ChebatC.BoivinR. (2007). Voice and persuasion in a banking telemarketing context. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 104(2), 419–437. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.104.2.419-437
13.
ChengJ. T.TracyJ. L.HoS.HenrichJ. (2016). Listen, follow me: Dynamic vocal signals of dominance predict emergent social rank in humans. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(5), 536–547. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000166
14.
CritesS. L.FabrigarL. R.PettyR. E. (1994). Measuring the affective and cognitive properties of attitudes: Conceptual and methodological issues. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(6), 619–634. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167294206001
15.
DunloskyJ.MetcalfeJ. (2009). Metacognition. Sage.
16.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA. G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
FraccaroP. J.JonesB. C.VukovicJ.SmithF. G.WatkinsC. D.FeinbergD. R.LittleA. C.DebruineL. M. (2011). Experimental evidence that women speak in a higher voice pitch to men they find attractive. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 9(1), 57–67. https://doi.org/10.1556/jep.9.2011.33.1
19.
Gelinas-ChebatC.ChebatJ. C. (1992). Effects of two voice characteristics on the attitudes toward advertising messages. The Journal of Social Psychology, 132(4), 447–459. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1992.9924724
20.
GoupilL.KouiderS. (2019). Developing a reflective mind: From core metacognition to explicit self-reflection. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(4), 403–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721419848672
21.
GregoryS. W.Jr.WebsterS. (1996). A nonverbal signal in voices of interview partners effectively predicts communication accommodation and social status perceptions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(6), 1231–1240. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.6.1231
22.
GuyerJ. J.BriñolP.PettyR. E.HorcajoJ. (2019). Non-verbal behavior of persuasive sources: A Multiple process analysis. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 43, 203–231.
23.
GuyerJ. J.BriñolP.Vaughan-JohnstonT. I.FabrigarL. R.MorenoL.VidalL.PettyR. E. (2020, February). The role of vocal confidence in persuasion: A self-validation perspective [Paper presentation]. Society for Personality and Social Psychology Conference in New Orleans, LA, United States.
24.
GuyerJ. J.FabrigarL. R.Vaughan-JohnstonT. I. (2018a). Speech rate, intonation, and pitch: Investigating the bias and cue effects of vocal confidence on persuasion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(3), 389–405. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218787805
25.
GuyerJ. J.FabrigarL. R.Vaughan-JohnstonT. I. (July 12–14, 2018b). Vocal confidence and persuasion: How speech rate affects amount of processing as a function of recipient ability and motivation [Paper presentation]. Ohio State University Attitudes Conference in Columbus, OH, United States.
26.
GuyerJ. J.FabrigarL. R.Vaughan-JohnstonT. I.TangC. (2018). The counter-intuitive influence of vocal affect on the efficacy of affectively-based persuasive messages. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 74, 161–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.09.005
27.
GuyerJ. J.Vaughan-JohnstonT. I.FabrigarL. R. (March 1–3, 2018). Vocal intonation can influence persuasion by moderating the amount of thinking [Poster presentation]. Attitude Pre-conference at the Society for Personality and Social Psychology Conference in Atlanta, GA, United States.
HughesS. M.FarleyS. D.RhodesB. C. (2010). Vocal and physiological changes in response to the physical attractiveness of conversational partners. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 34(3), 155–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-010-0087-9
30.
HughesS. M.MogilskiJ. K.HarrisonM. A. (2014). The perception and parameters of intentional voice manipulation. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 38(1), 107–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-013-0163-z
31.
JiangX.PellM. (2014, May). Encoding and decoding confidence information in speech [Conference session]. 7th International Conference on Speech Prosody 2014. https://doi.org/10.21437/speechprosody.2014-102
32.
KennyD. A.JuddC. M. (2019). The unappreciated heterogeneity of effect sizes: Implications for power, precision, planning of research, and replication. Psychological Methods, 24(5), 578–589. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000209
33.
KilleyaL. A.JohnsonB. T. (1998). Experimental induction of biased systematic processing: The directed-thought technique. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(1), 17–33.
34.
KimbleC. E.SeidelS. D. (1991). Vocal signs of confidence. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 15(2), 99–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00998265
35.
KlofstadC. A.AndersonR. C.NowickiS. (2015). Perceptions of competence, strength, and age influence voters to select leaders with lower-pitched voices. PLOS ONE, 10(8), e0133779. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133779
36.
KlofstadC. A.AndersonR. C.PetersS. (2012). Sounds like a winner: Voice pitch influences perception of leadership capacity in both men and women. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 297(1738), 2698–2704. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2012.0311
37.
LeongómezJ. D.BinterJ.KubicováL.StolařováP.KlapilováK.HavlíčekJ.RobertsS. C. (2014). Vocal modulation during courtship increases proceptivity even in naive listeners. Evolution and Human Behavior, 35(6), 489–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2014.06.008
38.
LiebermanP.BlumsteinS. E. (1988). Speech physiology, speech perception, and acoustic phonetics. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139165952
39.
MehrabianA.FerrisS. R. (1967). Inference of attitudes from nonverbal communication in two channels. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 31(3), 248–252. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0024648
40.
MehrabianA.WilliamsM. (1969). Nonverbal concomitants of perceived and intended persuasiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13(1), 37–58. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0027993
41.
MillerN.MaruyamaG.BeaberR. J.ValoneK. (1976). Speed of speech and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34(4), 615–624. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.34.4.615
42.
NiedenthalP.WinkielmanP.MondillonL.VermeulenN. (2009). Embodiment of emotion concepts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1120–1136. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015574
43.
PettyR. E.BriñolP.FabrigarL. R.WegenerD. T. (2019). Attitude structure and change. In BaumeisterR. F.FinkelE. J. (Eds.), Advanced social psychology (2nd ed., pp. 117–156). Oxford University Press.
44.
PettyR. E.BriñolP.TormalaZ. L. (2002). Thought confidence as a determinant of persuasion: The self-validation hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(5), 722–741. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.5.722
45.
PettyR. E.CacioppoJ. T. (1984). The effects of involvement on responses to argument quantity and quality: Central and peripheral routes to persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(1), 69–81. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.46.1.69
46.
PettyR. E.CacioppoJ. T. (1986). The Elaboration Likelihood Model of persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 123–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60214-2
47.
PettyR. E.BriñolP. (2012). The Elaboration Likelihood Model. In Van LangeP. A. M.KruglanskiA.HigginsE. T. (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol.1, pp. 224–245). London, England: SAGE.
48.
PettyR. E.SchumannD. W.RichmanS. A.StrathmanA. J. (1993). Positive mood and persuasion: Different roles for affect under high and low elaboration conditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.64.1.5
49.
PettyR. E.WegenerD. T. (1993). Flexible correction processes in social judgment: Correcting for context induced contrast. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 137–165. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1993.1007
50.
PisanskiK.BryantG. A. (2019). The evolution of voice perception. In EidsheimN. S.MeizelK. L. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of voice studies (pp. 268–300). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199982295.013.29
51.
PisanskiK.OleszkiewiczA.PlachetkaJ.GmiterekM.RebyD. (2018). Voice pitch modulation in human mate choice. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 285(1893), 20181634. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2018.1634
52.
PittamJ.GalloisC. (1987). Predicting impressions of speakers from voice quality: Acoustic and perceptual measures. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 5(4), 233–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927x8600500401
53.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 36(4), 717–731. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206553
54.
PutsD. A.GaulinS. J. C.VerdoliniK. (2006). Dominance and the evolution of sexual dimorphism in human voice pitch. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27(4), 283–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.11.003
55.
SchererK. R.LondonH.WolfJ. J. (1973). The voice of confidence: Paralinguistic cues and audience evaluation. Journal of Research in Personality, 7(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(73)90030-5
SchwarzN.CloreG. L. (1983). Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(3), 513–523. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.3.513
58.
ShroutP. E.BolgerN. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7(4), 422–445. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.7.4.422
SorokowskiP.PutsD.JohnsonJ.ŻółkiewiczO.OleszkiewiczA.SorokowskaA.KowalM.BorkowskaB.PisanskiK. (2019). Voice of authority: Professionals lower their vocal frequencies when giving expert advice. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 43(2), 257–269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-019-00307-0
61.
TiceD. M. (1992). Self-concept change and self-presentation: The looking glass self is also a magnifying glass. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(3), 435–451.
62.
TitzeI. R. (1994). Principles of voice production. Prentice Hall.
63.
TopolinskiS.StrackF. (2009). Motormouth: Mere exposure depends on stimulus-specific motor simulations. Journal of Experimental Psychology of Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 423–433. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014504
64.
TormalaZ. L.BriñolP.PettyR. E. (2007). Multiple roles for source credibility under high elaboration: It’s all in the timing. Social Cognition, 25, 536–552.
65.
Van ZantA. B.BergerJ. (2020). How the voice persuades. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 118(4), 661–682. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000193
66.
WangX.LuS.LiX. I.KhamitovM.BendleN. (2021). Audio mining: The role of vocal tone in persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 48(2), 189–211. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucab031
67.
WellsG. L.PettyR. E. (1980). The effects of overt head movements on persuasion: Compatibility and incompatibility of responses. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 1(3), 219–230. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp0103_2
WilsonT. D.BrekkeN. (1994). Mental contamination and mental correction: Unwanted influences on judgments and evaluations. Psychological Bulletin, 116(1), 117–142. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.116.1.117
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
