We explore the conditions under which people will opt in to reading information about bias and stereotypes, a key precursor to the types of self-directed learning that diversity and anti-bias advocates increasingly endorse. Across one meta-analysis (total N = 1,122; 7 studies, 5 pre-registered) and 2 pre-registered experiments (total N = 1,717), we identify a condition under which people opt in to reading more about implicit bias and stereotypes. People randomly assigned to read a growth, rather than fixed, mindset frame about bias opted in to read more information about stereotypes and implicit bias (Study 1 and Study 3). The mechanism that drove these effects was individuals’ construal of the task as a challenge (Studies 2 and 3). Our findings offer insight into how to promote engagement with information about stereotypes and biases. We discuss how this work advances the study of mindsets and diversity science.
AgrestiA. (2007). An introduction to categorical data analysis (2nd ed.). Wiley.
2.
BelleD.TartarillaA. B.WapmanM.SchlieberM.MercurioA. E. (2021). “I can’t operate, that boy is my son!” Gender schemas and a classic riddle. Sex Roles, 85(3), 161–171.
3.
BezrukovaK.SpellC. S.PerryJ. L.JehnK. A. (2016). A meta-analytical integration of over 40 years of research on diversity training evaluation. Psychological Bulletin, 142(11), 1227–1274. http://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000067
4.
BlackwellL. S.TrzesniewskiK. H.DweckC. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78(1), 246–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.00995.x
BrodaM.YunJ.SchneiderB.YeagerD. S.WaltonG. M.DiemerM. (2018). Reducing inequality in academic success for incoming college students: A randomized trial of growth mindset and belonging interventions. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 11(3), 317–338. http://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2018.1429037
7.
BurnetteJ. L.KnouseL. E.VavraD. T.O’BoyleE.BrooksM. A. (2020). Growth mindsets and psychological distress: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 77, Article 101816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2020.101816
8.
CanningE. A.OzierE.WilliamsH. E.AlRasheedR.MurphyM. C. (2022). Professors who signal a fixed mindset about ability undermine women’s performance in STEM. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 13(5), 927–937.
9.
CarrP. B.DweckC. S.PaukerK. (2012). “Prejudiced” behavior without prejudice? Beliefs about the malleability of prejudice affect interracial interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(3), 452–471. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028849
ChangE. H.MilkmanK. L.GrometD. M.RebeleR. W.MasseyC.DuckworthA. L.GrantA. M. (2019). The mixed effects of online diversity training. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116(16), 7778–7783. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1816076116
12.
ChaoM. M.VisariaS.MukhopadhyayA.DehejiaR. (2017). Do rewards reinforce the growth mindset? Joint effects of the growth mindset and incentive schemes in a field intervention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 146(10), 1402–1419. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000355
13.
ChiuC-y.HongY-y.DweckC. S. (1997). Lay dispositionism and implicit theories of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(1), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.1.19
14.
CoxeS.WestS. G.AikenL. S. (2009). The analysis of count data: A gentle introduction to poisson regression and its alternatives. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91, 121–136. http://doi.org/10.1080/00223890802634175
15.
DienerC. I.DweckC. S. (1978). An analysis of learned helplessness: Continuous changes in performance, strategy, and achievement cognitions following failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(5), 451–462.
DweckC. S. (1999). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Psychology Press.
19.
DweckC. S.LeggettE. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256–273. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.256
EhrlingerJ.MitchumA. L.DweckC. S. (2016). Understanding overconfidence: Theories of intelligence, preferential attention, and distorted self-assessment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 63, 94–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.11.001
22.
EisenhauerJ. G. (2021). Meta-analysis and mega-analysis: A simple introduction. Teaching Statistics, 43(1), 21–27.
23.
ElliotA. J.ReisH. T. (2003). Attachment and exploration in adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 317–331. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.317
24.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
25.
ForscherP. S.LaiC. K.AxtJ. R.EbersoleC. R.HermanM.DevineP. G.NosekB. A. (2019). A meta-analysis of procedures to change implicit measures. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 117(3), 522–559. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000160
26.
GeorgeacO. A. M.RattanA. (2023). The business case for diversity backfires: Detrimental effects of organizations’ instrumental diversity rhetoric for underrepresented group members’ sense of belonging. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 124, 69–108. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000394
27.
GohJ. X.HallJ. A.RosenthalR. (2016). Mini meta-analysis of your own studies: Some arguments on why and a primer on how. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10(10), 535–549. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12267
28.
GoldenbergA.Cohen-ChenS.GoyerJ. P.DweckC. S.GrossJ. J.HalperinE. (2018). Testing the impact and durability of a group malleability intervention in the context of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(4), 696–701. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1706800115
29.
GoodC.RattanA.DweckC. S. (2012). Why do women opt out? Sense of belonging and women’s representation in mathematics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(4), 700–717.
30.
GreenwaldA. G.McGheeD. E.SchwartzJ. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1464–1480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464
31.
GrossJ. J.JohnO. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 348–362. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.348
32.
HahnA.GawronskiB. (2019). Facing one’s implicit biases: From awareness to acknowledgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 116(5), 769–794. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000155
33.
HalperinE. (2011). Emotional barriers to peace: Emotions and public opinion of Jewish Israelis about the peace process in the Middle East. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 17(1), 22–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/10781919.2010.487862
34.
HayesA. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. Guildford Press.
35.
HennesE. P.PietriE. S.Moss-RacusinC. A.MasonK. A.DovidioJ. F.BrescollV. L.. . . HandelsmanJ. (2018). Increasing the perceived malleability of gender bias using a modified video intervention for diversity in STEM (VIDS). Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 21(5), 788–809. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430218755923
36.
HowellJ. L.GaitherS. E.RatliffK. A. (2015). Caught in the middle: Defensive responses to IAT feedback among Whites, Blacks, and biracial Black/Whites. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6(4), 373–381. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550614561127
37.
HoytC. L.BurnetteJ. L. (2013). Gender bias in leader evaluations: Merging implicit theories and role congruity perspectives. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(10), 1306–1319. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213493643
38.
KulikC. T.PepperM. B.RobersonL.ParkerS. K. (2007). The rich get richer: Predicting participation in voluntary diversity training. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28(6), 753–769. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.444
39.
LaCosseJ.MurphyM. C.GarciaJ. A.ZirkelS. (2021). The role of STEM professors’ mindset beliefs on students’ anticipated psychological experiences and course interest. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(5), 949–971.
40.
LazarusR. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. Oxford University Press.
LevyS. R.DweckC. S. (1999). The impact of children’s static versus dynamic conceptions of people on stereotype formation. Child Development, 70(5), 1163–1180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00085
43.
LevyS. R.PlaksJ. E.HongY-y.ChiuC-y.DweckC. S. (2001). Static versus dynamic theories and the perception of groups: Different routes to different destinations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(2), 156–168. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0502_6
44.
LevyS. R.StroessnerS. J.DweckC. S. (1998). Stereotype formation and endorsement: The role of implicit theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1421–1436. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1421
45.
MadanS.BasuS.RattanA.SavaniK. (2019). Support for resettling refugees: The role of fixed versus growth mind-sets. Psychological Science, 30(2), 238–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797618813561
46.
McGregorH. A.ElliotA. J. (2002). Achievement goals as predictors of achievement relevant processes prior to task engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 381–395. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.94.2.381
47.
MrazekA. J.IhmE. D.MoldenD. C.MrazekM. D.ZedeliusC. M.SchoolerJ. W. (2018). Expanding minds: Growth mindsets of self-regulation and the influences on effort and perseverance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 79, 164–180.
48.
MurphyM. C.ReevesS. L. (2019). Personal and organizational mindsets at work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 39, 100–121.
49.
NeelR.ShapiroJ. R. (2012). Is racial bias malleable? Whites’ lay theories of racial bias predict divergent strategies for interracial interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(1), 101–120. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028237
50.
NussbaumA. D.DweckC. S. (2008). Defensiveness versus remediation: Self-Theories and modes of self-esteem maintenance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(5), 599–612. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207312960
PauneskuD.WaltonG. M.RomeroC.SmithE. N.YeagerD. S.DweckC. S. (2015). Mind-set interventions are a scalable treatment for academic underachievement. Psychological Science, 26(6), 784–793.
53.
PirlottA. G.MacKinnonD. P. (2016). Design approaches to experimental mediation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 29–38.
54.
RattanA.DweckC. S. (2010). Who confronts prejudice? The role of implicit theories in the motivation to confront prejudice. Psychological Science, 21(7), 952–959. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610374740
55.
RattanA.DweckC. S. (2018). What happens after prejudice is confronted in the workplace? How mindsets affect minorities’ and women’s outlook on future social relations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(6), 676–687. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000287
56.
RattanA.GeorgeacO. (2017). Understanding intergroup relations through the lens of implicit theories (mindsets) of malleability. Social Personality Psychology Compass, 11(4), Article e12305. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12305
57.
RattanA.OzgumusE. (2021). Embedding mindsets in context: Theoretical considerations and opportunities for studying fixed-growth lay theories in the workplace. Research in Organizational Behavior, 39, Article 100127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2020.100127
58.
RegeM.HanselmanP.SolliI. F.DweckC. S.LudvigsenS.BettingerE.. . . YeagerD. S. (2021). How can we inspire nations of learners? An investigation of growth mindset and challenge-seeking in two countries. American Psychologist, 76(5), 755–767.
59.
SaguyT.HalperinE. (2014). Exposure to outgroup members criticizing their own group facilitates intergroup openness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(6), 791–802. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167214525475
60.
StephensN. M.RiveraL. A.TownsendS. S. (2020). What works to increase diversity? A multi-level approach. Research in Organizational Behavior, 39, 1–51.
61.
ThalerR. H.SunsteinC. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Yale University Press.
VitriolJ. A.MoskowitzG. B. (2021). Reducing defensive responding to implicit bias feedback: On the role of perceived moral threat and efficacy to change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 96, Article 104165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2021.104165
64.
YeagerD. S.RomeroC.PauneskuD.HullemanC. S.SchneiderB.HinojosaC.LeeH. Y.O’BrienJ.FlintK.RobertsA.TrottJ. (2016). Using design thinking to improve psychological interventions: The case of the growth mindset during the transition to high school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(3), 374–391. http://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000098
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
