Although research has focused on the “innocence problem,” “partial innocence” may also plague individuals who plead guilty to crimes they did not commit, but that are either comparable, more severe, or less severe than their actual crimes. Using a high-stake experimental paradigm and an immersive role-playing paradigm, we examined the psychology of partial innocence. Students were randomly induced (or imagined themselves) to be innocent, guilty, or partially innocent of committing an academic transgression and then given the choice to accept or reject a deal to avoid disciplinary sanction. Across three studies (Ns = 88, 75, 746), partially innocent students pled to cheating nearly as often as guilty students and vastly more often than innocent students. Partially innocent students—not unlike guilty students—experienced greater feelings of guilt than did innocent students. In turn, these feelings of guilt, but not shame, were associated with taking responsibility for a range of transgressions not committed.
AjzenI. (2020). The theory of planned behavior: Frequently asked questions. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(4), 314–324. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.195
3.
AytonP.PottA.ElwakiliN. (2007). Affective forecasting: Why can’t people predict their emotions?Thinking & Reasoning, 13(1), 62–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546780600872726
4.
BaumertA.HalmburgerA.SchmittM. (2013). Interventions against norm violations: Dispositional determinants of self-reported and real moral courage. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(8), 1053–1068.
5.
BeckA. T.EpsteinN.BrownG.SteerR. A. (1988). An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: Psychometric properties. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 893–897. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.56.6.893
6.
BibasS. (2004). Plea bargaining outside the shadow of trial. Harvard Law Review, 117, 2463.
7.
BordensK. S.BassettJ. (1985). The plea bargaining process from the defendant’s perspective: A field investigation. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 6(2), 93–110. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp0602_1
8.
BosterF. J.CruzS.ManataB.DeAngelisB. N.ZhuangJ. (2016). A meta-analytic review of the effect of guilt on compliance. Social Influence, 11(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/15534510.2016.1142892
CallanM. J.SuttonR. M.HarveyA. J.DawtryR. J. (2014). Immanent justice reasoning: Theory, research, and current directions. In ZannaM.OlsonJ. (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 49, pp. 105–161). Academic Press.
12.
CardenasS. A. (2023). Charged up and anchored down: A test of two pathways to judgmental and decisional anchoring biases in plea negotiations. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law. Advanced online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000390
13.
CarlsmithJ. M.GrossA. E. (1969). Some effects of guilt on compliance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 11(3), 232–239. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0027039
14.
CialdiniR. B.DarbyB. L.VincentJ. E. (1973). Transgression and altruism: A case for hedonism. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 9(6), 502–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(73)90031-0
15.
DavisD.O’DonohueW. T. (2004). The road to perdition: Extreme influence tactics in the interrogation room. In O’DonohueW. T.LevenskyE. R. (Eds.), Handbook of forensic psychology: Resource for mental health and legal professionals (pp. 897–996). Elsevier Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012524196-0/50037-1
DelacreM.LakensD.LeysC. (2017). Why psychologists should by default use Welch’s t-test instead of Student’s t-test. International Review of Social Psychology, 30(1), 92–101. https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.82
18.
DervanL. E.EdkinsV. A. (2013). Innocent defendant’s dilemma: An innovative empirical study of plea bargaining’s innocence problem. The Journal Criminal Law & Criminology, 103, 1.
19.
DunningD.MeyerowitzJ. A.HolzbergA. D. (1989). Ambiguity and self-evaluation: The role of idiosyncratic trait definitions in self-serving assessments of ability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1082–1090. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1082
20.
EpleyN.DunningD. (2000). Feeling “holier than thou”: Are self-serving assessments produced by errors in self-or social prediction?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 861–875. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.861
21.
FeatherN. T. (1999). Judgments of deservingness: Studies in the psychology of justice and achievement. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3(2), 86–107. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0302_1
22.
FeatherN. T. (2006). Deservingness and emotions: Applying the structural model of deservingness to the analysis of affective reactions to outcomes. European Review of Social Psychology, 17(1), 38–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280600662321
23.
FeatherN. T.McKeeI. R.BekkerN. (2011). Deservingness and emotions: Testing a structural model that relates discrete emotions to the perceived deservingness of positive or negative outcomes. Motivation and Emotion, 35(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-011-9202-4
24.
FreedmanJ. L.WallingtonS. A.BlessE. (1967). Compliance without pressure: The effect of guilt. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 7(2), 117–124. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0025009
25.
GilovichT.SavitskyK.MedvecV. H. (1998). The illusion of transparency: Biased assessments of others’ ability to read one’s emotional states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 332–346. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.75.2.332
26.
GregoryW. L.MowenJ. C.LinderD. E. (1978). Social psychology and plea bargaining: Applications, methodology, and theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(12), 1521–1530. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.36.12.1521
27.
GudjonssonG. H. (2003). The psychology of interrogations and confessions: A handbook. John Wiley.
28.
GuyllM.MadonS.YangY.LanninD. G.ScherrK.GreathouseS. (2013). Innocence and resisting confession during interrogation: Effects on physiologic activity. Law and Human Behavior, 37, 366–375. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000044
29.
HayesA. F.PreacherK. J. (2014). Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 67(3), 451–470. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12028
30.
HedgesL.OlkinI. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Academic Press.
31.
HendersonK. S.LevettL. M. (2018). Investigating predictors of true and false guilty pleas. Law and Human Behavior, 42(5), 427–441. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000297
32.
InbauF.ReidJ.BuckleyJ.JayneB. (2013). Criminal interrogation and confessions. Jones & Bartlett Publishers.
KassinS. M. (2005). On the psychology of confessions: Does innocence put innocents at risk?American Psychologist, 60(3), 215–218. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.60.3.215
LakensD.CaldwellA. (2021). Simulation-based power analysis for factorial analysis of variance designs. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920951503
40.
LernerM. J. (1980). The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. Plenum.
MarschallD.SanftnerJ.TangneyJ. P. (1994). The State Shame and Guilt Scale. Fairfax, VA: George Mason University.
43.
OeberstA.ImhoffR. (2023). Toward parsimony in bias research: A proposed common framework of belief-consistent information processing for a set of biases. Perspectives on Psychological Science. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916221148147
44.
PardieckA. M.EdkinsV. A.DervanL. E. (2020). Bargained justice: The rise of false testimony for false pleas. Fordham International Law Journal, 44(2), 469–528. https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ilj/vol44/iss2/4
45.
PerilloJ. T.CrozierW. E.PollickC. L.KassinS. M. (March2014). The effect of prior false confession on guilty plea decisions [Paper presentation]. American Psychology-law Society Conference, New Orleans, LA, United States.
46.
PerilloJ. T.KassinS. M. (2011). Inside interrogation: The lie, the bluff, and false confessions. Law and Human Behavior, 35(4), 327–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-010-9244-2
47.
RedlichA. D.BushwayS. D.NorrisR. J. (2016). Plea decision-making by attorneys and judges. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 12(4), 537–561. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-016-9264-0
48.
RedlichA. D.ShteynbergR. V. (2016). To plead or not to plead: A comparison of juvenile and adult true and false plea decisions. Law and Human Behavior, 40(6), 611–625. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000205
49.
RedlichA. D.YanS.NorrisR. J.BushwayS. D. (2017). The influence of confessions on guilty pleas and plea discounts. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 24(2), 147–157. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000144
50.
RobinsonM. D.CloreG. L. (2001). Simulation, scenarios, and emotional appraisal: Testing the convergence of real and imagined reactions to emotional stimuli. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(11), 1520–1532. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672012711012
51.
RosseelY. (2012). lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://www.jstatsoft.org/v48/i02/
52.
RussanoM. B.MeissnerC. A.NarchetF. M.KassinS. M. (2005). Investigating true and false confessions within a novel experimental paradigm. Psychological Science, 16(6), 481–486. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01560.x
53.
ScherrK. C.FranksA. S. (2015). The world is not fair: An examination of innocent and guilty suspects’ waiver decisions. Law and Human Behavior, 39, 142–151. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000121
54.
SheeranP. (2002). Intention—behavior relations: A conceptual and empirical review. European Review of Social Psychology, 12(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792772143000003
55.
SchneiderR. A.ZottoliT. M. (2019). Disentangling the effects of plea discount and potential trial sentence on decisions to plead guilty. Legal Criminological Psychology, 24(2), 288–304. https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.12157
56.
TangneyJ. P.StuewigJ.HafezL. (2011). Shame, guilt, and remorse: Implications for offender populations. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 22(5), 706–723. https://doi.org/10.1080/14789949.2011.617541
TorA.Gazal-AyalO.GarciaS. M. (2010). Fairness and the willingness to accept plea bargain offers. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 7(1), 97–116. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-1461.2009.01171.x
WatsonD.ClarkL. A.TellegenA. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
63.
WilfordM. M.SutherlandK. T.GonzalesJ. E.RabinovichM. (2021). Guilt status influences plea outcomes beyond the shadow-of-the-trial in an interactive simulation of legal procedures. Law and Human Behavior, 45(4), 271–286. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000450
64.
WilfordM. M.WellsG. L. (2018). Bluffed by the dealer: Distinguishing false pleas from false confessions. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 24(2), 158–170. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000165
65.
WilfordM. M.WellsG. L.FrazierA. (2021). Plea-bargaining law: The impact of innocence, trial penalty, and conviction probability on plea outcomes. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 46(3), 554–575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-020-09564-y
66.
WilsonT. D.GilbertD. T. (2013). The impact bias is alive and well. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105(5), 740–748. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032662
ZottoliT. M.Daftary-KapurT.WintersG. M.HoganC. (2016). Plea discounts, time pressures, and false-guilty pleas in youth and adults who pleaded guilty to felonies in New York City. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 22(3), 250–259. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000095
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
