Enclothed cognition refers to the systematic influence that clothes can have on the wearer’s feelings, thoughts, and behaviors through their symbolic meaning. It has attracted considerable academic and nonacademic interest, with the 2012 article that coined the phrase cited more than 600 times and covered in more than 160 news outlets. However, a recent high-powered replication failed to replicate one of the original effects. To determine whether the larger body of research on enclothed cognition possesses evidential value and replicable effects, we performed z-curve and meta-analyses using 105 effects from 40 studies across 24 articles (N = 3,789). Underscoring the marked improvement of psychological research practices in the mid-2010s, our results raise concerns about the replicability of early enclothed cognition studies but affirm the evidential value for effects published after 2015. These later studies support the core principle of enclothed cognition—what we wear influences how we think, feel, and act.
AdamH.GalinskyA. D. (2012). Enclothed cognition. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 918–925.
2.
AdamH.GalinskyA. D. (2019). Reflections on enclothed cognition: Commentary on Burns et al. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 83, 157–159.
3.
AdomaitisA. D.JohnsonK. K. (2005). Casual versus formal uniforms: Flight attendants’ self-perceptions and perceived appraisals by others. Clothing & Textiles Research Journal, 23, 88–101.
4.
AgadullinaE. R.LovakovA. V. (2018). Are people more prejudiced towards groups that are perceived as coherent? A meta-analysis of the relationship between out-group entitativity and prejudice. British Journal of Social Psychology, 57(4), 703–731.
5.
BaileyE. R.HortonC. B.GalinskyA. D. (2022). Enclothed harmony or enclothed dissonance? The effect of attire on the authenticity, power, and engagement of remote workers. Academy of Management Discoveries, 8(3), 341–356.
6.
BakdashaJ. Z.MarusichL. R. (2022). Left-truncated effects and overestimated meta-analytic means. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 119(31), e2203616119.
7.
BalduzziS.RückerG.SchwarzerG. (2019). How to perform a meta-analysis with R: A practical tutorial. Evidence-Based Mental Health, 22, 153–160.
8.
BarsalouL. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577–609.
9.
BarsalouL. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645.
BrinolP.PettyR. E.BeldingJ. (2017). Objectification of people and thoughts: An attitude change perspective. British Journal of Social Psychology, 56, 233–249.
16.
BrodeurA.LéM.SangnierM.ZylberbergY. (2016). Star wars: The empirics strike back. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 8(1), 1–32.
17.
BrunnerJ.SchimmackU. (2020). Estimating population mean power under conditions of heterogeneity and selection for significance. Meta-psychology, 4.
18.
BurgerA. M.BlessH. (2017). Cognitive consequences of formal clothing: The effects of clothing versus thinking of clothing. Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology, 2, 228–252.
19.
BurnsD. M.FoxE. L.GreensteinM.OlbrightG.MontgomeryD. (2019). An old task in new clothes: A preregistered direct replication attempt of enclothed cognition effects on Stroop performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 83, 150–156.
20.
CamererC. F.DreberA.HolzmeisterF.HoT. H.HuberJ.JohannessonM.. . .WuH. (2018). Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(9), 637–644.
21.
CarneyD. R.CuddyA. J.YapA. J. (2010). Power posing: Brief nonverbal displays affect neuroendocrine levels and risk tolerance. Psychological Science, 21, 1363–1368.
22.
CarterE. C.SchönbrodtF. D.GervaisW. M.HilgardJ. (2019). Correcting for bias in psychology: A comparison of meta-analytic methods. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(2), 115–144.
ChristensenG.MiguelE. (2018). Transparency, reproducibility, and the credibility of economics research. Journal of Economic Literature, 56(3), 920–980.
25.
CiceroD. C.MartinE. A.BeckerT. M.KernsJ. G. (2016). Decreased self-concept clarity in people with schizophrenia. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 204(2), 142–147.
26.
CivileC.ObhiS. S. (2017). Students wearing police uniforms exhibit biased attention toward individuals wearing hoodies. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 62.
27.
CoyneS. M.RogersA.ShawcroftJ.HurstJ. L. (2021). Dressing up with Disney and make-believe with Marvel: The impact of gendered costumes on gender typing, prosocial behavior, and perseverance during early childhood. Sex Roles, 85, 1–12.
28.
CutrightK. M.SrnaS.SamperA. (2019). The aesthetics we wear: How attire influences what we buy. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 4, 387–397.
29.
DuboisD.AnikL. (2020). From style to status and to power: When and why do stylistic choices in footwear make women feel and act powerful?Advances in Strategic Management, 34, 77–100.
30.
EarpB. D.EverettJ. A.MadvaE. N.HamlinJ. K. (2014). Out, damned spot: Can the “Macbeth Effect” be replicated?Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 36, 91–98.
31.
EarpB. D.TrafimowD. (2015). Replication, falsification, and the crisis of confidence in social psychology. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 621.
32.
EllisD. A.JenkinsR. (2015). Watch-wearing as a marker of conscientiousness. PeerJ, 3, e1210.
FormannA. K. (2008). Estimating the proportion of studies missing for meta-analysis due to publication bias. Contemporary Clinical Trials, 29(5), 732–739.
35.
FrancisG. (2014). The frequency of excess success for articles in Psychological Science. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 1180–1187.
36.
FrankM. G.GilovichT. (1988). The dark side of self and social perception: Black uniforms and aggression in professional sports. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 74–85.
37.
FredricksonB. L.RobertsT. A.NollS. M.QuinnD. M.TwengeJ. M. (1998). That swimsuit becomes you: Sex differences in self-objectification, restrained eating, and math performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 269–284.
38.
FrieseM.FrankenbachJ.JobV.LoschelderD. D. (2017). Does self-control training improve self-control? A meta-analysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(6), 1077–1099.
39.
GambleT.WalkerI. (2016). Wearing a bicycle helmet can increase risk taking and sensation seeking in adults. Psychological Science, 27, 289–294.
40.
GarrisonK. E.TangD.SchmeichelB. J. (2016). Embodying power: A preregistered replication and extension of the power pose effect. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7, 623–630.
41.
GinoF.NortonM. I.ArielyD. (2010). The counterfeit self: The deceptive costs of faking it. Psychological Science, 21, 712–720.
42.
GlenbergA. M. (1997). What memory is for. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20, 1–55.
43.
GohJ. X.HallJ. A.RosenthalR. (2016). Mini meta-analysis of your own studies: Some arguments on why and a primer on how. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10(10), 535–549.
44.
HannoverB.KuhnenU. (2002). “The clothing makes the self” via knowledge activation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 2513–2525.
45.
HeblM. R.KingE. B.LinJ. (2004). The swimsuit becomes us all: Ethnicity, gender, and vulnerability to self-objectification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1322–1331.
46.
HedgesL. V.TiptonE.JohnsonM. C. (2010). Robust variance estimation in meta-regression with dependent effect size estimates. Research Synthesis Methods, 1(1), 39–65.
47.
IshiiK.NumazakiM.Tado’okaY. (2019). The effect of pink/blue clothing on implicit and explicit gender-related self-cognition and attitudes among men. Japanese Psychological Research, 61, 123–132.
48.
JohnsonR. D.DowningL. L. (1979). Deindividuation and valence of cues: Effects on prosocial and antisocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1532–2538.
49.
JonesM. G.LeeT.ChesnuttK.CarrierS.EnnesM.CaytonE.MaddenL.HuffP. (2019). Enclothed cognition: Putting lab coats to the test. International Journal of Science Education, 41, 1962–1976.
50.
KarlK. A.HallL. M.PeluchetteJ. V. (2013). City employee perceptions of the impact of dress and appearance: You are what you wear. Public Personnel Management, 42, 452–470.
51.
KouchakiM.GinoF.JamiA. (2014). The burden of guilt: Heavy backpacks, light snacks, and enhanced morality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 414–424.
52.
KrausM. W.MendesW. B. (2014). Sartorial symbols of social class elicit class consistent behavioral and physiological responses: A dyadic approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 2330–2340.
53.
KurdiB.SeitchikA. E.AxtJ. R.CarrollT. J.KarapetyanA.KaushikN.. . .BanajiM. R. (2019). Relationship between the Implicit Association Test and intergroup behavior: A meta-analysis. American Psychologist, 74(5), 569–586.
54.
KwonY. (1994). The influence of appropriateness of dress and gender on the self-perception of occupational attributes. Clothing & Textiles Research Journal, 12, 33–39.
55.
LeBelE. P.McCarthyR. J.EarpB. D.ElsonM.VanpaemelW. (2018). A unified framework to quantify the credibility of scientific findings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(3), 389–402.
56.
LindsayD. S. (2015). Replication in psychological science. Psychological Science, 26(12), 1827–1832.
57.
López-PérezB.AmbronaT.WilsonE. L.KhalilM. (2016). The effect of enclothed cognition on empathic responses and helping behavior. Social Psychology, 47, 223–231.
58.
LynottD.CorkerK. S.WortmanJ.ConnellL.DonnellanM. B.LucasR. E.O’BrienK. (2014). Replication of “Experiencing physical warmth promotes interpersonal warmth” by Williams and Bargh (2008). Social Psychology, 45, 216–222.
59.
MartinsY.TiggemannM.KirkbrideA. (2007). Those speedos become them: The role of self-objectification in gay and heterosexual men’s body image. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 634–647.
60.
MathurM. B.VanderWeeleT. J. (2019). New metrics for meta-analyses of heterogeneous effects. Statistics in Medicine, 38(8), 1336–1342.
61.
MaxwellS. E.LauM. Y.HowardG. S. (2015). Is psychology suffering from a replication crisis? What does “failure to replicate” really mean?American Psychologist, 70(6), 487–498.
62.
MendozaS. A.Parks-StammE. J. (2020). Embodying the police: The effects of enclothed cognition on shooting decisions. Psychological Reports, 123, 2353–2371.
63.
MotylM.DemosA. P.CarselT. S.HansonB. E.MeltonZ. J.MuellerA. B.. . .SkitkaL. J. (2017). The state of social and personality science: Rotten to the core, not so bad, getting better, or getting worse?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(1), 34–58.
64.
NiedenthalP. M.BarsalouL. W.WinkielmanP.Krauth-GruberS.RicF. (2005). Embodiment in attitudes, social perception, and emotion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 184–211.
65.
OgleJ. P.TynerK. E.Schofield-TomschinS. (2013). The role of maternity dress consumption in shaping the self and identity during the liminal transition of pregnancy. Journal of Consumer Culture, 13, 119–139.
66.
Open Science Collaboration. (2015). PSYCHOLOGY. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), aac4716.
67.
PashlerH.HarrisC. R. (2012). Is the replicability crisis overblown? Three arguments examined. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 531–536.
68.
PeluchetteJ. V.KarlK. (2007). The impact of workplace attire on employee self-perceptions. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 18, 345–360.
69.
PeñaJ.HancockJ. T.MerolaN. A. (2009). The priming effects of avatars in virtual settings. Communication Research, 36, 838–856.
PustejovskyJ. E.TiptonE. (2022). Meta-analysis with robust variance estimation: Expanding the range of working models. Prevention Science, 23(3), 425–438.
72.
RafaeliA.DuttonJ.HarquailC. V.Mackie-LewisS. (1997). Navigating by attire: The use of dress by female administrative employees. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 9–45.
73.
RichardF. D.BondC. F.Jr.Stokes-ZootaJ. J. (2003). One hundred years of social psychology quantitatively described. Review of General Psychology, 7(4), 331–363.
74.
SchimmackU. (2020). A meta-psychological perspective on the decade of replication failures in social psychology. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne, 61(4), 364–376.
75.
SchimmackU.BartošF. (2023). Estimating the false discovery risk of (randomized) clinical trials in medical journals based on published p-values (arXiv:2302.00774). https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.00774
76.
SchimmackU.BrunnerJ. (2017). Z-curve: A method for the estimating replicability based on test statistics in original studies. OSF Preprints.
77.
SimmonsJ. P.SimonsohnU. (2017). Power posing: P-curving the evidence. Psychological Science, 28, 687–693.
78.
SimonsohnU.NelsonL. D.SimmonsJ. P. (2014). P-curve: A key to the file-drawer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 534–547.
SimonsohnU.SimmonsJ. P.NelsonL. D. (2015). Better P-curves: Making P-curve analysis more robust to errors, fraud, and ambitious P-hacking, a reply to Ulrich and Miller (2015). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144, 1146–1152.
81.
SingerJ. E.BrushC. A.LublinS. C. (1965). Some aspects of deindividuation: Identification and conformity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1, 356–378.
82.
SlepianM. L.FerberS. N.GoldJ. M.RutchickA. M. (2015). The cognitive consequences of formal clothing. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6, 661–668.
83.
SolomonM. R.SchoplerJ. (1982). Self-consciousness and clothing. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8, 508–514.
84.
Tanner-SmithE. E.TiptonE.PolaninJ. R. (2016). Handling complex meta-analytic data structures using robust variance estimates: A tutorial in R. Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology, 2(1), 85–112.
85.
TiggemannM.AndrewR. (2012). Clothes make a difference: The role of self objectification. Sex Roles, 66, 646–654.
86.
Van StockumC. A.DeCaroM. S. (2014). Enclothed cognition and controlled attention during insight problem-solving. The Journal of Problem Solving, 7, 73–83.
87.
Van’t VeerA. E.Giner-SorollaR. (2016). Pre-registration in social psychology—A discussion and suggested template. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 67, 2–12.
88.
VickroyS. C.ShawJ. B.FisherC. D. (1982). Effects of temperature, clothing, and task complexity on task performance and satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 97–102.
89.
WangX.WangX.LeiJ.ChaoM. C. H. (2021). The clothes that make you eat healthy: The impact of clothes style on food choice. Journal of Business Research, 132, 787–799.
90.
WhiteR. E.CarlsonS. M. (2016). What would Batman do? Self-distancing improves executive function in young children. Developmental Science, 19, 419–426.
91.
WhiteR. E.PragerE. O.SchaeferC.KrossE.DuckworthA. L.CarlsonS. M. (2017). The “Batman Effect”: Improving perseverance in young children. Child Development, 88, 1563–1571.
WilsonD. B.LipseyM. W. (2001). The role of method in treatment effectiveness research: Evidence from meta-analysis. Psychological Methods, 6(4), 413–429.
94.
ZhongC. B.BohnsV. K.GinoF. (2010). Good lamps are the best police: Darkness increases dishonesty and self-interested behavior. Psychological Science, 21, 311–314.
95.
ZhongC. B.LiljenquistK. (2006). Washing away your sins: Threatened morality and physical cleansing. Science, 313, 1451–1452.
96.
ZickfeldJ. H.SchubertT. W. (2016). Revisiting and extending a response latency measure of inclusion of the other in the self. Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology, 1(1–3), 106–129.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
