We Need Tough Brothers and Sisters in a Tight World: Cultural Tightness Leads to a Preference for Dominant and Muscular Leaders

Abstract

Cultural tightness is characterized by strong norms and harsh punishments for deviant behaviors. We hypothesized that followers in tight (vs. loose) cultures would more strongly prefer muscular leaders. This hypothesis was confirmed across seven studies (N = 1,615) employing samples from the United States, the United Kingdom, and China. Using actual political leaders, we demonstrated that the tighter the state’s culture was, the more muscular the elected governor was (Study 1). Temporarily situating participants in a tight (vs. loose) culture made them select a leader higher on muscularity but not on body fat, and the effects obtained occurred for both male and female leaders (Studies 2–3B). In addition, we demonstrated the mediating role of authoritarianism and a preference for a dominant leadership in this process (Studies 4–5B). These results demonstrate the importance of considering the interface between culture and the physical appearance of leaders.

Keywords

cultural tightness authoritarianism leadership preference body muscularity dominance

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aktas

Gelfand

M. J.

Hanges

P. J.

(2016). Cultural tightness-looseness and perceptions of effective leadership. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 47(2), 294–309. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022115606802

Alrajih

Ward

(2014). Increased facial width-to-height ratio and perceived dominance in the faces of the UK’s leading business leaders. British Journal of Psychology, 105(2), 153–161. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12035

Altemeyer

(1996). The authoritarian specter. Harvard University Press.

Altemeyer

(2022, March 5). A shorter version of the RWA Scale. The Authoritarians. https://theauthoritarians.org/a-shorter-version-of-the-rwa-scale/

Arkenau

Vocks

Taube

C. O.

Waldorf

Hartmann

A. S.

(2020). The body image matrix of thinness and muscularity-male bodies: Development and validation of a new figure rating scale for body image in men. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 76(7), 1283–1292. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22933

Barkan

(Ed.). (2020). Strongman Gov. Andrew Cuomo gives up and whines again about Trump and the Feds. https://news.yahoo.com/strongman-gov-andrew-cuomo-gives-235318187.html

Blake

K. R.

Brooks

R. C.

(2019). Status anxiety mediates the positive relationship between income inequality and sexualization. PNAS Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116(50), 25029–25033. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1909806116

Bloomberg. (Ed.). (2018). El-Sisi calls on Egyptians to lose weight. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-12-25/el-sissi-s-call-on-egyptians-to-lose-weight-creates-a-stir?leadSource=uverify%20wall

Bøggild

Laustsen

(2016). An intra-group perspective on leader preferences: Different risks of exploitation shape preferences for leader facial dominance. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(6), 820–837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.09.003

10.

Carney

D. R.

Hall

J. A.

LeBeau

L. S.

(2005). Beliefs about the nonverbal expression of social power. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 29(2), 105–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-005-2743-z

11.

Carpenter

(2000). Effects of cultural tightness and collectivism on self-concept and causal attributions. Cross-Cultural Research, 34(1), 38–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/106939710003400103

12.

Carrier

D. R.

Morgan

M. H.

(2015). Protective buttressing of the hominin face. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 90(1), 330–346. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12112

13.

Chen

Wang

X. J.

Zang

H. L.

Guinote

(2021). Being a tough person in a tight world: Cultural tightness leads to a desire for muscularity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 96, Article 104183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2021.104183

14.

Cheng

J. T.

Tracy

J. L.

Henrich

(2010). Pride, personality, and the evolutionary foundations of human social status. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31(5), 334–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.02.004

15.

Conway

L. G.

III Bongard

Plaut

Gornick

L. J.

Dodds

D. P.

Giresi

Tweed

R. G.

Repke

M. A.

Houck

S. C.

(2017). Ecological origins of freedom: Pathogens, heat stress, and frontier topography predict more vertical but less horizontal governmental restriction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(10), 1378–1398. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167217713192

16.

Conway

L. G.

III Houck

S. C.

Gornick

L. J.

Repke

M. A.

(2018). Finding the Loch Ness Monster: Left-wing authoritarianism in the United States. Political Psychology, 39(5), 1049–1067. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12470

17.

Conway

L. G.

III McFarland

J. D.

Costello

T. H.

Lilienfeld

S. O.

(2021). The curious case of left-wing authoritarianism: When authoritarian persons meet anti-authoritarian norms. Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology, 5(4), 423–442. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts5.108

18.

Conway

L. G.

III Sexton

S. M.

Tweed

R. G.

(2006). Collectivism and governmentally initiated restrictions: A cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis across nations and within a nation. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37(1), 20–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022105282293

19.

Conway

L. G.

III Zubrod

Chan

McFarland

J. D.

van de Vliert

(2023). Is the myth of left-wing authoritarianism itself a myth? Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 1041391. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1041391

20.

Costello

T. H.

Bowes

S. M.

Stevens

S. T.

Waldman

I. D.

Tasimi

Lilienfeld

S. O.

(2022). Clarifying the structure and nature of left-wing authoritarianism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 122(1), 135–170. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000341

21.

Dijker

A. J. M.

DeLuster

Peeters

Vries

N. K.

(2017). Seeing overweight adults as babies: Physical cues and implications for stigmatization. British Journal of Psychology, 108(4), 757–782. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12240

22.

Duckitt

(1989). Authoritarianism and group identification: A new view of an old construct. Political Psychology, 10(1), 63–84. https://doi.org/10.2307/3791588

23.

Duckitt

Bizumic

Krauss

S. W.

Heled

(2010). A tripartite approach to Right-Wing Authoritarianism: The Authoritarianism-Conservatism-Traditionalism model. Political Psychology, 31(5), 685–715. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00781.x

24.

Faul

Erdfelder

Lang

A. G.

Buchner

(2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193146

25.

Fincher

C. L.

Thornhill

(2012). Parasite-stress promotes in-group assortative sociality: The cases of strong family ties and heightened religiosity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35(2), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X11000021

26.

Frederick

D. A.

Buchanan

G. M.

Sadehgi-Azar

Peplau

L. A.

Haselton

M. G.

Berezovskaya

Lipinski

R. E.

(2007). Desiring the muscular ideal: Men’s body satisfaction in the United States, Ukraine, and Ghana. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 8(2), 103–117. https://doi.org/10.1037/1524-9220.8.2.103

27.

Frederick

D. A.

Haselton

M. G.

(2007). Why is muscularity sexy? Tests of the fitness indicator hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(8), 1167–1183. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207303022

28.

Garfield

Z. H.

Hubbard

R. L.

Hagen

E. H.

(2019). Evolutionary models of leadership: Tests and synthesis. Human Nature, 30(1), 23–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-019-09338-4

29.

Gelfand

M. J.

Nishii

L. H.

Raver

J. L.

(2006). On the nature and importance of cultural tightness-looseness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(6), 1225–1244. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1225

30.

Gelfand

M. J.

Raver

J. L.

Nishii

Leslie

L. A.

Lun

Lim

B. C.

Duan

Almaliach

Ang

Arnadottir

Aycan

Boehnke

Boski

Cabecinhas

Chan

Chhokar

D’Amato

Ferrer

Fischlmayr

I. C.

. . . Yamaguchi

(2011). Differences between tight and loose cultures: A 33-nation study. Science, 332(6033), 1100–1104. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1197754

31.

Hall

J. A.

Coats

E. J.

LeBeau

L. S.

(2005). Nonverbal behavior and the vertical dimension of social relations: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 131(6), 898–924. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.6.898

32.

Harrington

J. R.

Gelfand

M. J.

(2014). Tightness-looseness across the 50 United States. PNAS Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(22), 7990–7995. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1317937111

33.

Haselhuhn

M. P.

Wong

E. M.

Ormiston

M. E.

Inesi

M. E.

Galinsky

A. D.

(2014). Negotiating face-to-face: Men’s facial structure predicts negotiation performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(5), 835–845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.12.003

34.

Hershcovis

M. S.

Neville

Reich

T. C.

Christie

A. M.

Cortina

L. M.

Shan

J. V.

(2017). Witnessing wrongdoing: The effects of observer power on incivility intervention in the workplace. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 142, 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2017.07.006

35.

Jackson

J. C.

Caluori

Abrams

Beckman

Gelfand

Gray

(2021). Tight cultures and vengeful gods: How culture shapes religious belief. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 150(10), 2057–2077. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001033

36.

Kakkar

Sivanathan

(2017). When the appeal of a dominant leader is greater than a prestige leader. PNAS Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114(26), 6734–6739. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1617711114

37.

Krumhuber

E. G.

Wang

Guinote

(2022). The powerful self: How social power and gender influence face perception. Current Psychology, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-02798-5

38.

Kümmerli

(2011). A test of evolutionary policing theory with data from human societies. PLoS ONE, 6(9), Article e24350. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0024350

39.

Laustsen

(2017). Choosing the right candidate: Observational and experimental evidence that conservatives and liberals prefer powerful and warm candidate personalities, respectively. Political Behavior, 39(4), 883–908. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-016-9384-2

40.

Laustsen

Petersen

M. B.

Klofstad

C. A.

(2015). Vote choice, ideology, and social dominance orientation influence preferences for lower pitched voices in political candidates. Evolutionary Psychology, 13(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704915600576

41.

Gordon

Gelfand

M. J.

(2017). Tightness-looseness: A new framework to understand consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 27(3), 377–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2017.04.001

42.

Litman

Robinson

Abberbock

(2017). TurkPrime.com: A versatile crowdsourcing data acquisition platform for the behavioral sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 49(2), 433–442. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0727-z

43.

Lukaszewski

A. W.

Simmons

Z. L.

Anderson

Roney

J. R.

(2016). The role of physical formidability in human social status allocation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110(3), 385–406. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000042

44.

Manson

J. H.

(2020). Right-wing authoritarianism, left-wing authoritarianism, and pandemic-mitigation authoritarianism. Personality and Individual Differences, 167, Article 110251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110251

45.

Mazur

Booth

(1998). Testosterone and dominance in men. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21(3), 353–397. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X98001228

46.

Kitayama

Han

Gelfand

M. J.

(2015). How culture gets embrained: Cultural differences in event-related potentials of social norm violations. PNAS Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112(50), 15348–15353. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1509839112

47.

Munoz-Reyes

J. A.

Polo

Rodríguez-Sickert

Pavez

Valenzuela

Ramírez-Herrera

(2019). Muscularity and strength affect individual variation in self- perception of fighting ability in men. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00018

48.

Obschonka

Stuetzer

Rentfrow

P. J.

Shaw-Taylor

Satchell

Silbereisen

R. K.

Potter

Gosling

S. D.

(2018). In the shadow of coal: How large-scale industries contributed to present-day regional differences in personality and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 115(5), 903–927. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000175

49.

Puhl

R. M.

Heuer

C. A.

(2009). The stigma of obesity: A review and update. Obesity, 17(5), 941–964. https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2008.636

50.

Ratcliffe

R. G.

(2021, April 14). How Greg Abbott became the most powerful governor in Texas history. Texas Monthly. https://www.texasmonthly.com/news-politics/greg-abbott-seized-power/

51.

D. E.

DeBruine

L. M.

Jones

B. C.

Perrett

D. I.

(2013). Facial cues to perceived height influence leadership choices in simulated war and peace contexts. Evolutionary Psychology, 11(1), 89–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470491301100109

52.

Ronay

Greenaway

Anicich

E. M.

Galinsky

A. D.

(2012). The path to glory is paved with hierarchy: When hierarchical differentiation increases group effectiveness. Psychological Science, 23(6), 669–677. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611433876

53.

Shah

P. P.

Peterson

R. S.

Jones

S. L.

Ferguson

A. J.

(2021). Things are not always what they seem: The origins and evolution of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 66(2), 426–474. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839220965186

54.

Stamkou

van Kleef

G. A.

Homan

A. C.

Gelfand

M. J.

van de Vijver

F. J. R.

van Egmond

M. C.

Boer

Phiri

Ayub

Kinias

Cantarero

Treister

D. E.

Figueiredo

Hashimoto

Hofmann

E. B.

Lima

R. P.

Lee

I.-C.

(2019). Cultural collectivism and tightness moderate responses to norm violators: Effects on power perception, moral emotions, and leader support. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(6), 947–964. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218802832

55.

Stenner

(2005). The authoritarian dynamic. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614712

56.

Talhelm

Zhang

Oishi

Shimin

Duan

Lan

Kitayama

(2014). Large-scale psychological differences within China explained by rice versus wheat agriculture. Science, 344(6184), 603–608. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1246850

57.

Vandello

J. A.

Cohen

(1999). Patterns of individualism and collectivism across the United States. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(2), 279–292. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.2.279

58.

van Vugt

Hogan

Kaiser

R. B

. (2008). Leadership, followership, and evolution: Some lessons from the past. American Psychologist, 63(3), 182–196. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.63.3.182

59.

van Vugt

Spisak

B. R

. (2008). Sex differences in the emergence of leadership during competitions within and between groups. Psychological Science, 19(9), 854–858. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02168.x

60.

Wallace-Wells

(2022, June 28). The political strategy of Ron DeSantis’s “Don’t Say Gay” bill. The New Yorker. https://www.newyorker.com/news/the-political-scene/the-political-strategy-of-ron-desantiss-dont-say-gay-bill

61.

Wang

Chen

Luo

(2022). An exchange orientation results in an instrumental approach in intimate relationships. British Journal of Social Psychology, 61(4), 1144–1159. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12530

62.

Wang

Chen

Yang

(2021). Women’s intrasexual competition results in beautification. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 12(5), 648–657. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550620933403

63.

Wang

Chen

Shi

Chen

(2023). Threatened humanity in a tight world: Cultural tightness results in self-objectification. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 25(8), 2003–2020. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302221097842

64.

Wang

Chen

Krumhuber

E. G.

Chen

(2021). Money and flexible generosity. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 60(4), 1262–1278. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12450

65.

Wang

Guinote

Krumhuber

E. G.

(2018). Dominance biases in the perception and memory for the faces of powerholders, with consequences for social inferences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 78, 23–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.05.003

66.

Yee

(2019, April 23). Egypt approves new muscle for el-Sisi, its strongman leader. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/23/world/middleeast/sisi-egypt-referendum.html

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.02 MB