We adopted an intersectional stereotyping lens to investigate whether race-based size bias—the tendency to judge Black men as larger than White men—extends to adolescents. Participants judged Black boys as taller than White boys, despite no real size differences (Studies 1A and 1B), and even when boys were matched in age (Study 1B). The size bias persisted when participants viewed computer-generated faces that varied only in apparent race (Study 2A) and extended to perceptions of physical strength, with Black boys judged as stronger than White boys (Study 2B). The size bias was associated with threat-related perceptions, including beliefs that Black boys were less innocent than White boys (Study 3). Finally, the size bias was moderated by a valid threat signal (i.e., anger expressions, Studies 4A and 4B). Thus, adult-like threat stereotypes are perpetrated upon Black boys, leading them to be erroneously perceived as more physically formidable than White boys.
AudS.KewalRamaniA.FrohlichL. (2011). America’s youth: Transitions to adulthood (Report No. NCES 2012–026). National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education Sciences.
2.
BullockJ. G.GreenD. P.HaS. E. (2010). Yes, but what’s the mechanism? (Don’t expect an easy answer). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(4), 550–558. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018933
CorrellJ.WittenbrinkB.ParkB.JuddC. M.GoyleA. (2011). Dangerous enough: Moderating racial bias with contextual threat cues. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(1), 184–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.08.017
5.
CrenshawK. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), 139–167. https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf/vol1989/iss1/8
6.
DixonT. L.MaddoxK. B. (2005). Skin tone, crime news, and social reality judgments: Priming the stereotype of the dark and dangerous Black criminal. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35(8), 1555–1570. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2005.tb02184.x
7.
DondersN. C.CorrellJ.WittenbrinkB. (2008). Danger stereotypes predict racially biased attentional allocation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(5), 1328–1333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.04.002
8.
DuncanB. L. (1976). Differential social perception and attribution of intergroup violence: Testing the lower limits of stereotyping of Blacks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34(4), 590–598. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.34.4.590
9.
EberhardtJ. L.GoffP. A.PurdieV. J.DaviesP. G. (2004). Seeing Black: Race, crime, and visual processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(6), 876–893. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.6.876
10.
EdwardsL. F. (1998). Captives of Wilmington: The riot and historical memories of political conflict, 1865-1898. In TysonT. B.CecelskiD. S. (Eds.), Democracy betrayed: The Wilmington race riot of 1898 and its legacy (pp. 113–141). University of North Carolina Press.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.BuchnerA.LangA. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G* Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/brm.41.4.1149
13.
FesslerD. M.HolbrookC. (2013). Friends shrink foes: The presence of comrades decreases the envisioned physical formidability of an opponent. Psychological Science, 24(5), 797–802. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612461508
14.
FesslerD. M.HolbrookC.SnyderJ. K. (2012). Weapons make the man (larger): Formidability is represented as size and strength in humans. PLOS ONE, 7(4), Article e32751. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0032751
15.
GilmoreG. E. (1998). Murder, memory, and the flight of the incubus. In TysonT. B.CecelskiD. S. (Eds.), Democracy betrayed: The Wilmington race riot of 1898 and its legacy (pp. 73–93). University of North Carolina Press.
16.
GoffP. A.JacksonM. C.Di LeoneB. A. L.CulottaC. M.DiTomassoN. A. (2014). The essence of innocence: Consequences of dehumanizing Black children. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106(4), 526–545. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035663
HalberstadtA. G.CookeA. N.GarnerP. W.HughesS. A.OertwigD.NeupertS. D. (2022). Racialized emotion recognition accuracy and anger bias of children’s faces. Emotion, 22(3), 403–417. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000756
19.
HalberstadtA. G.CookeA. N.HaganC. A.LiuX. (2021). PerCEIVED: Perceptions of children’s emotions in videos, evolving and dynamic task. Emotion, 21(8), 1781–1795. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0001019
20.
HesterN.GrayK. (2018). For Black men, being tall increases threat stereotyping and police stops. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(11), 2711–2715. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1714454115
HugenbergK.BodenhausenG. V. (2004). Ambiguity in social categorization: The role of prejudice and facial affect in race categorization. Psychological Science, 15(5), 342–345. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00680.x
23.
HutchingsP. B.HaddockG. (2008). Look Black in anger: The role of implicit prejudice in the categorization and perceived emotional intensity of racially ambiguous faces. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(5), 1418–1420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.05.002
24.
JohnsonD. J.WilsonJ. P. (2019). Racial bias in perceptions of size and strength: The impact of stereotypes and group differences. Psychological Science, 30(4), 553–562. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619827529
25.
JuddC. M.WestfallJ.KennyD. A. (2012). Treating stimuli as a random factor in social psychology: A new and comprehensive solution to a pervasive but largely ignored problem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(1), 54–69. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028347
26.
JuddC. M.WestfallJ.KennyD. A. (2017). Experiments with more than one random factor: Designs, analytic models, and statistical power. Annual Review of Psychology, 68, 601–625. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033702
27.
KangS. K.ChasteenA. L. (2009). Beyond the double-jeopardy hypothesis: Assessing emotion on the faces of multiply-categorizable targets of prejudice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(6), 1281–1285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.07.002
28.
KawakamiK.AmodioD. M.HugenbergK. (2017). Intergroup perception and cognition: An integrative framework for understanding the causes and consequences of social categorization. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 55, 1–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.2016.10.001
29.
LegetteK. B.HalberstadtA. G.MajorsA. T. (2021). Teachers’ understanding of racial inequity predicts their perceptions of students’ behaviors. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 67, 102014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2021.102014
30.
LundbergG. J. W.NeelR.LassetterB.ToddA. R. (2018). Racial bias in implicit danger associations generalizes to older male targets. PLOS ONE, 13(6), Article e0197398. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197398
31.
MarshA. A.AdamsR. B.JrKleckR. E. (2005). Why do fear and anger look the way they do? Form and social function in facial expressions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(1), 73–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204271306
32.
MeuwissenA. S.AndersonJ. E.ZelazoP. D. (2017). The creation and validation of the Developmental Emotional Faces Stimulus Set. Behavior Research Methods, 49(3), 960–966. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0756-7
33.
MontoyaA. K.HayesA. F. (2017). Two-condition within-participant statistical mediation analysis: A path-analytic framework. Psychological Methods, 22(1), 6–27. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000086
34.
MorrisM. W. (2016). Pushout: The criminalization of Black girls in schools. The New Press.
35.
OkonofuaJ. A.EberhardtJ. L. (2015). Two strikes: Race and the disciplining of young students. Psychological Science, 26(5), 617–624. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615570365
36.
OliverM. B. (2003). African American men as “criminal and dangerous”: Implications of media portrayals of crime on the “criminalization” of African American men. Journal of African American Studies, 7(2), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12111-003-1006-5
37.
PetskoC. D.BodenhausenG. V. (2020). Multifarious person perception: How social perceivers manage the complexity of intersectional targets. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 14(2), e12518. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12518
RattanA.LevineC. S.DweckC. S.EberhardtJ. L. (2012). Race and the fragility of the legal distinction between juveniles and adults. PLOS ONE, 7(5), Article e36680. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036680
40.
RemediosJ. D.VinluanA. C. (in press). Stereotyping across multiple social categories: Toward an intersectional approach [Manuscript in press].
41.
RiddleT.SinclairS. (2019). Racial disparities in school-based disciplinary actions are associated with county-level rates of racial bias. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116(17), 8255–8260. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1808307116
42.
SagarH. A.SchofieldJ. W. (1980). Racial and behavioral cues in Black and White children’s perceptions of ambiguously aggressive acts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(4), 590–598. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.39.4.590
43.
SimM.AlmarazS. M.HugenbergK. (2022). Stereotyping at the intersection of race and weight: Diluted threat stereotyping of obese Black men. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 99, 104274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2021.104274
44.
Singular Inversions. (2021). FaceGen Modeller Pro (Version 3.27).
45.
SkibaR. J.HornerR. H.ChungC. G.Karega RauschM.MayS. L.TobinT. (2011). Race is not neutral: A national investigation of African American and Latino disproportionality in school discipline. School Psychology Review, 40, 85–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2011.12087730
46.
SkibaR. J.MichaelR. S.NardoA. C.PetersonR. L. (2002). The color of discipline: Sources of racial and gender disproportionality in school punishment. The Urban Review, 34, 317–342. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021320817372
47.
SommersS. R.ApfelbaumE. P.DukesK. N.ToosiN.WangE. J. (2006). Race and media coverage of Hurricane Katrina: Analysis, implications, and future research questions. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 6, 39–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-2415.2006.00103.x
48.
ThiemK. C.NeelR.SimpsonA. J.ToddA. R. (2019). Are black women and girls associated with danger? Implicit racial bias at the intersection of target age and gender. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(10), 1427–1439. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167219829182
49.
ToddA. R.SimpsonA. J.ThiemK. C.NeelR. (2016). The generalization of implicit racial bias to young Black boys: Automatic stereotyping or automatic prejudice?Social Cognition, 34, 306–323. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2016.34.4.306
50.
ToddA. R.ThiemK. C.NeelR. (2016). Does seeing faces of young Black boys facilitate the identification of threatening stimuli?Psychological Science, 27(3), 384–393. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615624492
51.
TrawalterS.ToddA. R.BairdA. A.RichesonJ. A. (2008). Attending to threat: Race-based patterns of selective attention. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(5), 1322–1327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.03.006
52.
WestfallJ.KennyD. A.JuddC. M. (2014). Statistical power and optimal design in experiments in which samples of participants respond to samples of stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(5), 2020–2045. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000014
53.
WilliamsR. M. (2013). A war in Black and White: The cartoons of Norman Ethre Jennett & the North Carolina election of 1898. Southern Cultures, 19(2), 7–31. https://doi.org/10.1353/scu.2013.0014
54.
WilsonJ. P.HugenbergK.RuleN. O. (2017). Racial bias in judgments of physical size and formidability: From size to threat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(1), 59–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000092
55.
YatesT. M.MarceloA. K. (2014). Through race-colored glasses: Preschoolers’ pretend play and teachers’ ratings of preschooler adjustment. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 29(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2013.09.003
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
