Radicalization—as a complex process of adopting extremist attitudes—includes maladaptive responses to the transformative power of globalization. Globalization contains sociocultural disruptive and acculturative processes, initiating exclusionary and integrative reactions. These reactions have dissimilarly been associated with aspects of extremism. In seven preregistered studies (N = 2,161), we draw on various methods combining naturalistic circumstances, cross-sectional, longitudinal, experimental, and representative data to scrutinize the complex globalization–radicalization nexus within the contexts of the United States, the United Kingdom, and Pakistan. Our results provide empirical support for the hypothesis that insecure life attachment (i.e., experience of contextual safety, inclusiveness, reliability, fairness, and facilitating well-being) and globalization perceived as a threat can lead to extremism through defensive reactions to globalization. Specifically, we found ethnic protection to be a central mechanism connecting sociocultural disruption and threats with extremism. Globalized radicalization ascends as a contemporary phenomenon reflecting the dark side of global interconnectivity.
AltigD.BakerS.BarreroJ. M.BloomN.BunnP.ChenS.. . .ThwaitesG. (2020). Economic uncertainty before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Public Economics, 191, Article 104274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104274
2.
ArielyG. (2012). Globalization, immigration and national identity: How the level of globalization affects the relations between nationalism, constructive patriotism and attitudes toward immigrants?Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 15(4), 539–557.
3.
ArielyG. (2017). Global identification, xenophobia and globalisation: A cross-national exploration. International Journal of Psychology, 52, 87–96.
BaumanZ. (1998). Globalization: The human consequences. Columbia University Press.
6.
BerryJ. W. (2008). Globalization and acculturation. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 32(4), 328–336. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2008.04.001
7.
BertelsenP. (2018). Mentoring in anti-radicalisation. LGT: A systematic assessment, intervention and supervision tool in mentoring. In OverlandI. G.AndersenA. J.FørdeK. E.GrødumK.SalomonsenJ. (Eds.), Violent extremism in the 21st century. International perspectives (pp. 312–354). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
8.
BorumR. (2011). Radicalization into violent extremism I: A review of social science theories. Journal of Strategic Security, 4(4), 7–36. http://doi.org/10.5038/1944-0472.4.4.1
9.
BowlbyJ. (1988). Developmental psychiatry comes of age. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 145(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.145.1.1
10.
BrightJ. (2018). Explaining the emergence of political fragmentation on social media: The role of ideology and extremism. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 23(1), 17–33. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmx002
11.
BuhrmesterM.KwangT.GoslingS. D. (2016). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality data? In KazdinA. E. (Ed.), Methodological issues and strategies in clinical research. American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14805-009
12.
BullockJ. G.GreenD. P. (2021). The failings of conventional mediation analysis and a design-based alternative. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4(4), 251524592110472. https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459211047227
13.
CameronJ. E.KocumL.BerryJ. W. (2020). Security and attitudes toward globalization: A multilevel analysis. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 8(2), 805–822. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v8i2.418
14.
CarriereK. R.HallahanA.MoghaddamF. M. (2022). The effect of perceived threat on human rights: A meta-analysis. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 25(1), 247–279.
15.
ChenS. X.LamB. C. P.HuiB. P. H.NgJ. C. K.MakW. W. S.GuanY.. . .LauV. C. Y. (2016). Conceptualizing psychological processes in response to globalization: Components, antecedents, and consequences of global orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110(2), 302–331. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039647
DaviesG.WuE.FrankR. (2021). A witch’s brew of grievances: The potential effects of COVID-19 on radicalization to violent extremism. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism. https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2021.1923188
20.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.BuchnerA.LangA. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G* Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160. http://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
21.
FaulknerJ.SchallerM.ParkJ. H.DuncanL. A. (2004). Evolved disease-avoidance mechanisms and contemporary xenophobic attitudes. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 7(4), 333–353. http://doi.org/10.1177/1368430204046142
FrancisG. (2012). The psychology of replication and replication in psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 585–594. http://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459520
24.
FreitagM.HofstetterN. (2022). Pandemic threat and intergroup relations: How negative emotions associated with the threat of Covid-19 shape attitudes towards immigrants. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 48, 2985–3004. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2022.2031925
25.
GhoshB.GuvenH. (Eds.). (2006). Globalization and the Third World: A study of negative consequences. Springer.
26.
GiddensA. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Stanford University Press.
27.
GoodhartD. (2017). The road to somewhere: The new tribes shaping British politics. Hurst & Company.
HafezM.MullinsC. (2015). The radicalization puzzle: A theoretical synthesis of empirical approaches to homegrown extremism. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, 38(11), 958–975. https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2015.1051375
30.
HeldD.McGrewA. (2007). Globalization/anti-globalization: Beyond the great divide. Polity Press.
31.
HoggM. A. (2021). Uncertain self in a changing world: A foundation for radicalisation, populism, and autocratic leadership. European Review of Social Psychology, 32, 235–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2020.1827628
JaskoK.WebberD.KruglanskiA. W.GelfandM.TaufiqurrohmanM.HettiarachchiM.GunaratnaR. (2020). Social context moderates the effects of quest for significance on violent extremism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 118(6), 1165–1187. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000198
34.
KimH. S.ShermanD. K.UpdegraffJ. A. (2016). Fear of Ebola: The influence of collectivism on xenophobic threat responses. Psychological Science, 27(7), 935–944. http://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616642596
35.
KinnvallC. (2004). Globalization and religious nationalism: Self, identity, and the search for ontological security. Political Psychology, 25(5), 741–767. https://doi.org/2048/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00396.x
36.
KinnvallC.Nesbitt-LarkingP. (2011). The political psychology of globalization: Muslims in the West. Oxford University Press.
37.
KlineR. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford Press.
38.
KruglanskiA. W.BertelsenP. (2020). Life psychology and significance quest: A complementary approach to violent extremism and counter-radicalisation. Journal of Policing, Intelligence and Counter Terrorism, 15(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/18335330.2020.1725098
39.
LeeJ. E. C.LemyreL. (2009). A social-cognitive perspective of terrorism risk perception and individual response in Canada. Risk Analysis, 29(9), 1265–1280. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01264.x
40.
LiQ.SchaubD. (2004). Economic globalization and transnational terrorism: A pooled time-series analysis. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 48(2), 230–258.
41.
Lyons-PadillaS.GelfandM. J.MirahmadiH.FarooqM.van EgmondM. (2015). Belonging nowhere: Marginalization & radicalization risk among Muslim immigrants. Behavioral Science & Policy, 1(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/1353/bsp.2015.0019
42.
MoghaddamF. M. (2008). How globalization spurs terrorism: The lopsided benefits of “one world” and why that fuels violence. Praeger Security International.
MorrisM. W.MokA.MorS. (2011). Cultural identity threat: The role of cultural identifications in moderating closure responses to foreign cultural inflow. Journal of Social Issues, 67(4), 760–773. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2011.01726.x
45.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (1998–2011). Mplus user’s guide (6th ed.).
46.
NavarreteC. D.FesslerD. M. T. (2006). Disease avoidance and ethnocentrism: The effects of disease vulnerability and disgust sensitivity on intergroup attitudes. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27(4), 270–282. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.12.001
47.
OabidiM.AnjumG.BierwiaczonekK.DovidioJ. F.OzerS.KunstJ. R. (2023). Cultural threat perceptions predict violent extremism via need for cognitive closure. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. Advance online publication.
48.
OatenM.StevensonR. J.CaseT. I. (2009). Disgust as a disease-avoidance mechanism. Psychological Bulletin, 135(2), 303–321. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0014823
49.
ObaidiM.KunstJ. R.OzerS.KimelS. Y. (2022). The great replacement conspiracy: How the perceived ousting of whites can evoke violent extremism and Islamophobia. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 25(7), 1675–1695. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302211028293
50.
ObaidiM.ThomsenL.BerghR. (2018). “They think we are a threat to their culture”: Meta-cultural threat fuels willingness and endorsement of extremist violence against the cultural outgroup. International Journal of Conflict and Violence, 12, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.4119/UNIBI/ijcv.647
51.
OzerS. (2020). Globalization and radicalization: A cross-national study of local embeddedness and reactions to cultural globalization in regard to violent extremism. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 76, 26–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2020.02.007
52.
OzerS.BertelsenP. (2018). Capturing violent radicalization: Developing and validating scales measuring central aspects of radicalization. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 59(6), 653–660. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12484
53.
OzerS.BertelsenP. (2019). Countering radicalization: An empirical examination from a life psychological perspective. Peace and Conflict, 25(3), 211–225. https://doi.org/10.1037/pac0000394
54.
OzerS.ObaidiM. (2022). Globalization and radicalization: The rise of extreme reactions to intercultural contact, sociocultural disruption, and identity threat. In Katzarska-MillerI.ReysenS. (Eds.), Globalized identities. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04644-5_5
55.
PratiG.PietrantoniL.ZaniB. (2011). A social-cognitive model of pandemic influenza H1N1 risk perception and recommended behaviors in Italy. Risk Analysis, 31(4), 645–656. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01529.x
56.
ReysenS.Katzarska-MillerI.BlakeM.PierceL. (2021). Attempts to impact global citizenship identification. Journal of Articles in Support of the Null Hypothesis, 18(1), 41–50. https://www.jasnh.com/pdf/Vol18-No1-article4.pdf
57.
RiosK.SosaN.OsbornH. (2018). An experimental approach to intergroup threat theory: Manipulations, moderators, and consequences of realistic vs. symbolic threat. European Review of Social Psychology, 29(1), 212–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2018.1537049
58.
RoosensE. E. (1989). Creating ethnicity: The process of ethnogenesis. SAGE.
59.
RosenmannA.ReeseG.CameronJ. E. (2016). Social identities in a globalized world: Challenges and opportunities for collective action. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(2), 202–221. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615621272
60.
RoyO. (2006). Globalized Islam: The search for a new Ummah. Columbia University Press.
61.
SchoemannA. M.BoultonA. J.ShortS. D. (2017). Determining power and sample size for simple and complex mediation models. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4), 379–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617715068
62.
SniderJ. S.ReysenS.Katzarska-MillerI. (2013). How we frame the message of globalization matters. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43(8), 1599–1607. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12111
63.
SpencerS. J.ZannaM. P.FongG. T. (2005). Establishing a causal chain: Why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6), 845–851. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.845
64.
StephanW. G.YbarraO.RiosK. (2016). Intergroup threat theory. In NelsonT. D. (Ed.), Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination (pp. 255–278). Psychology Press.
65.
StuartE. A.SchmidI.NguyenT.SarkerE.PittmanA.BenkeK.RudolphK.Badillo-GoicoecheaE.LeoutsakosJ.-M. (2022). Assumptions not often assessed or satisfied in published mediation analyses in psychology and psychiatry. Epidemiologic Reviews, 43(1), 48–52. https://doi.org/10.1093/epirev/mxab007
66.
TeneyC.LacewellO. P.De WildeP. (2014). Winners and losers of globalization in Europe: Attitudes and ideologies. European Political Science Review, 6(4), 575–595. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773913000246
67.
TomlinsonJ. (1999). Globalization and culture. University of Chicago Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
