Laypeople often believe that God punishes transgressions; however, their inferences about God’s punishment motives remain unclear. We addressed this topic by asking laypeople to indicate why God punishes. We also examined participants’ inferences about why humans punish to contribute to scholarly conversations regarding the extent to which people may anthropomorphize God’s mind. In Studies 1A to 1C, participants viewed God as less retributive than humans. In Study 2, participants expected God (vs. humans) to view humans’ true selves more positively; this difference mediated participants’ views of God as less retributive than humans. Study 3 manipulated agents’ views of humans’ true selves and examined how such information influenced each agent’s perceived motives. Participants viewed a given agent as less retributive when that agent regarded the true self as good (versus bad). These findings extend scholarship on lay theories of punishment motives and highlight links between religious and moral cognition.
ArmstrongK. (1993). A history of God: The 4,000-year quest of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. Random House Publishers.
2.
BallietD.MulderL. B.Van LangeP. A. M. (2011). Reward, punishment, and cooperation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 594–615. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023489
3.
BaronR. M.KennyD. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173
4.
BarrettJ. L. (1999). Theological correctness: Cognitive constraint and the study of religion. Method & Theory in the Study of Religion, 11, 325–339. https://doi.org/10.1163/157006899X00078
5.
BenchS. W.SchlegelR. J.DavisW. E.VessM. (2015). Thinking about change in the self and others: The role of self-discovery metaphors and the true self. Social Cognition, 33, 169–185. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2015.33.3.2
6.
BenthamJ. (1970). An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. Althone Press. (Original work published 1823)
7.
BeringJ.JohnsonD. (2005). “O Lord. . . You Perceive my Thoughts from Afar”: Recursiveness and the evolution of supernatural agency. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 5, 118–142. https://doi.org/10.1163/1568537054068679
8.
CarlsmithK. M. (2008). On justifying punishment: The discrepancy between words and actions. Social Justice Research, 21, 119–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-008-0068-x
9.
CarlsmithK. M.SoodA. M. (2009). The fine line between interrogation and retribution. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 191–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.08.025
De FreitasJ.CikaraM. (2018). Deep down my enemy is good: Thinking about the true self reduces intergroup bias. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 74, 307–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.10.006
12.
De FreitasJ.SarkissianH.NewmanG. E.GrossmannI.De BrigardF.LucoA.KnobeJ. (2018). Consistent belief in a good true self in misanthropes and three interdependent cultures. Cognitive Science, 42, 134–160. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12505
13.
DemoulinS.SaroglouV.Van PachterbekeM. (2008). Infra-humanizing others, supra-humanizing gods: The emotional hierarchy. Social Cognition, 26, 235–247. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2008.26.2.235
14.
DhaliwalN. A.SkarlickiD. P.HoeggJ.DanielsM. A. (2022). Consequentialist motives for punishment signal trustworthiness. Journal of Business Ethics, 176, 451–466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04664-5
15.
DunleaJ. P.HeiphetzL. (2021). Moral psychology as a necessary bridge between social cognition and law. Social Cognition, 39, 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2021.39.1.183
16.
DunleaJ. P.HeiphetzL. (2022). Language shapes children’s attitudes: Consequences of internal, behavioral, and societal information in punitive and non-punitive contexts. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 151(6), 1–64.
17.
EpleyN.ConverseB. A.DelboscA.MonteleoneG. A.CacioppoJ. T. (2009). Believers’ estimates of God’s beliefs are more egocentric than estimates of other people’s beliefs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 21533–21538. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0908374106
18.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA. G.BuchnerA. (2007). G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
FunkF.McGeerV.GollwitzerM. (2014). Get the message: Punishment is satisfying if the transgressor responds to its communicative intent. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 986–997. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167214533130
22.
GingesJ.SheikhH.AtranS.ArgoN. (2016). Thinking from God’s perspective decreases biased valuation of the life of a nonbeliever. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113, 316–319. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1512120113
23.
HaslamN.KashimaY.LoughnanS.ShiJ.SuitnerC. (2008). Subhuman, inhuman, and superhuman: Contrasting humans with nonhumans in three cultures. Social Cognition, 26, 248–258. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2008.26.2.248
24.
HeiphetzL. (2020). The development and consequences of moral essentialism. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 59, 165–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.acdb.2020.05.006
25.
HeiphetzL.LaneJ. D.WaytzA.YoungL. L. (2018). My mind, your mind, and God’s mind: How children and adults conceive of different agents’ moral beliefs. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 36, 467–481. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.12231
26.
HenrichJ.EnsmingerJ.McElreathR.BarrA.BarrettC.BolyanatzA.CardenasJ. C.GurvenM.GwakoE.HenrichN.LesorogolC.MarloweF.TracerD.ZikerJ. (2010). Markets, religion, community size, and the evolution of fairness and punishment. Science, 327, 1480–1484. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1182238
HumeD. (1888). A treatise of human nature. Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1739)
29.
IBM Corporation. (2021). IBM SPSS Statistics for macOS, Version 28.0.
30.
JohnsonD.BeringJ. (2006). Hand of God, mind of man: Punishment and cognition in the evolution of cooperation. Evolutionary Psychology, 4, 219–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470490600400119
KnightN.SousaP.BarrettJ. L.AtranS. (2004). Children’s attributions of beliefs to humans and God: Cross-cultural evidence. Cognitive Science, 28, 117–126. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2801_6
33.
LaurinK.ShariffA. F.HenrichJ.KayA. C. (2012). Outsourcing punishment to God: Beliefs in divine control reduce earthly punishment. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 279, 3272–3281. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2012.0615
34.
LegareC. H.EvansE. M.RosengrenK. S.HarrisP. L. (2012). The coexistence of natural and supernatural explanations across cultures and development. Child Development, 83, 779–793. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01743.x
35.
MarshallJ.YudkinD. A.CrockettM. J. (2021). Children punish third parties to satisfy both consequentialist and retributivist motives. Nature Human Behaviour, 5, 361–368. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-00975-9
36.
MathewS.BoydR. (2011). Punishment sustains large-scale cooperation in prestate warfare. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 11375–11380. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1105604108
37.
MontoyaA. K.HayesA. F. (2017). Two-condition within-participant statistical mediation analysis: A path-analytic framework. Psychological Methods, 22, 6–27. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000086
38.
NadlerJ.McDonnellM. H. (2011). Moral character, motive, and the psychology of blame. Cornell Law Review, 97, 255–304.
39.
NewmanG. E.BloomP.KnobeJ. (2014). Value judgments and the true self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 203–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213508791
40.
NewmanG. E.De FreitasJ.KnobeJ. (2015). Beliefs about the true self explain asymmetries based on moral judgment. Cognitive Science, 39, 96–125. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12134
41.
PaluckE. L. (2009). Reducing intergroup prejudice and conflict using the media: A field experiment in Rwanda. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 574–587. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0011989
42.
PasekM. H.ShackelfordC.SmithJ.VishkinA.LehnerA.GingesJ. (2020). God values the lives of my outgroup more than I do: Evidence from Fiji and Israel. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(7), 1032–1041. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550620904516
R Core Team. (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/
46.
RichertR. A.ShamanN. J.SaideA. R.LesageK. A. (2016). Folding your hands helps God hear you: Prayer and anthropomorphism in parents and children. Research in the Social Scientific Study of Religion, 27, 140–157. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004322035_010
47.
ShariffA. F.GreeneJ. D.KarremansJ. C.LuguriJ. B.ClarkC. J.SchoolerJ. W.BaumeisterF.VohsK. D. (2014). Free will and punishment: A mechanistic view of human nature reduces retribution. Psychological Science, 25, 1563–1570. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614534693
48.
ShariffA. F.NorenzayanA. (2011). Mean gods make good people: Different views of god predict cheating behavior. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 21(2), 85–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508619.2011.556990
49.
ShtulmanA.LindemanM. (2016). Attributes of God: Conceptual foundations of a foundational belief. Cognitive Science, 40, 635–670. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12253
50.
ShtulmanA.LombrozoM. (2016). Bundles of contradiction: A coexistence view of conceptual change. In BarnerD.BaronA. (Eds.), Core knowledge and conceptual change (pp. 49–67). Oxford University Press.
51.
ZhangY.AlickeM. (2021). My true self is better than yours: Comparative bias in true self judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 47(2), 216–231.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
